Skip to main content
Unit of study_

SSPS4101: Social Sciences and Social Change

Semester 1, 2022 [Normal day] - Remote

Life today is characterised by mounting concerns over inequality, oppression and environmental sustainability. Following Karl Marx's insistence that "The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it", the unit engages with exploring other possible ways of organising the world in which we live. Social scientists are well placed to diagnose and propose responses to the biggest challenges we face. Students will apply a social science lens to persistent problems in our economy, society and environment. The unit evaluates prevailing and alternative policy models in the context of the forces shaping and contesting states and economies.

Unit details and rules

Unit code SSPS4101
Academic unit Social and Political Sciences
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
ANTH3998 or ANTH3999 or CRIM3998 or CRIM3999 or ECOP3998 or ECOP3999 or GOVT3898 or GOVT3900 or SCLG3998 or SCLG3999 or SLSS3998 or SLSS3999
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

36 credits points towards a major in a relevant subject area in the social sciences or humanities

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Sonja Van Wichelen, sonja.vanwichelen@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Social Change Proposal Report
Assignment
40% STUVAC
Due date: 06 Jun 2022 at 23:59
2500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO4
Assignment Social Change Proposal Outline
Assignment
25% Week 09
Due date: 25 Apr 2022 at 23:59
1000wd
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO5 LO2 LO4
Assignment Online Discussion Contribution
Online Discussion Contribution
35% Weekly 250 words per week (1500 total)
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5

Assessment summary

Online Discussion Contribution

The total of the Online Discussion Contribution is worth 35% of the total mark for the unit. For this assessment you are expected to read the required reading material for each of the thematic weeks (week 2-11) and reflect on this material through an online submission of around 250 words. Your contribution can be your own reflection but can also be a 250 response to someone else’s reflection—as long as this includes direct engagement with the required readings. It is important that you engage critically with the material and write your reading reflection in an informed and engaged manner. Active engagement means that you are aware of the problems posed in the literature and are thinking analytically about the approaches that the authors take. A mark out of 10 is awarded for your semester-long contribution to the online discussion contributions. The mark recognises different learning and communication styles. Sharing your thoughts, insights (and confusion) and working through ideas is what is most valuable for learning, and therefore most valued when it comes to marks. It is possible for students to gain full marks for participation during the semester. Out of 9 contributions you can miss 3, which means that marks will be given to 6 online contributions in total (1500 words). The Online Discussion Contribution is due Thursday before class meets on the respective topic by 11.59PM via Canvas.


Social Change Proposal Outline

The Social Change Proposal Outline is worth 25% of the total mark of the unit. The 1000-word assignment is a vehicle for you to undertake preliminary independent research into one of the three thematic areas (or other areas after discussion with me). The idea is that you conceptualize a clear and concrete social problem and narrate an outline which forms the basis of your future Social Change Proposal (report). The outline should have four sections: 1) Background, 2) Central Problem, 3) Change Proposal 4) Annotated Bibliography (5 resources). It should use at least one scholarly reading (from the required list or recommended list) and at least one external media, legal, or government resource (newspaper, report, legislation). You do not have to worry about utilizing a system of citation for this assignment, but the annotated bibliography should contain five clear references to further literature and resources that will help you with your future report. Annotated means that you add one sentence to each reference that critically assesses the reading and how it will be useful for your project. More information on the Outline and its assessment criteria will be communicated in week 7 before the Easter break. The Outline is due on Monday April 25 by 11.59PM via Turnitin.


Social Change Proposal Report

The 2500-word Change Proposal is worth 40% of the total mark for the unit. This assignment is designed to assess your critical abilities to engage with a pertinent social problem but also your creative capabilities to think of possible solutions. The Social Change proposal comes in the genre of the formal report. Reports are a common format to tackle issues in policy, government, or law. A good report is one that approaches the topic on its own terms and uses conceptual ideas to explore the topic critically and inventively and uses insights from the empirical material to reflect upon and formulate alternatives. Drawing on the preliminary work in your Outline, you further expand on what is needed to tackle your particular social problem. Who are the stakeholders involved (government, legal or social institutions, businesses, communities)? And how will you be engaging with these stakeholders in your proposal. The report should use at least four scholarly readings and four non-scholarly but authoritative resources (governmental and NGO reports, legal documents, media, documentaries, manifestos). More information on the Social Change Proposal and its assessment criteria will be communicated in week 11. The report is due on Monday June 6 by 11.59PM via Turnitin.
 

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at an exceptional standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school.

Distinction

75 - 84

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at a very high standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school.

Credit

65 - 74

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at a good standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school.

Pass

50 - 64

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at an acceptable standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school.

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

Work not submitted on or before the due date is subject to a penalty of 5% per calendar day late. If work is submitted more than 10 days after the due date, or is submitted after the return date, the mark will be 0.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction Tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 02 Knowledge, Power and Climate Change Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 03 The Politics of the Anthropocene Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 04 Posthuman Sustainability Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 05 The Ethics of Genomics Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 06 The Challenge of Antimicrobial Resistance Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 07 Global Pandemics and Sovereign Politics Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 08 SCP Workshop - Conceptualising the Problem Workshop (3 hr) LO1 LO4 LO5
Week 09 SCP Workshop - Engaging Actors of Change Workshop (3 hr) LO1 LO4 LO5
Week 10 SCP Workshop - Writing a Report Workshop (3 hr) LO1 LO4 LO5
Week 11 The New Inequality Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 12 The Burnout Society Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 13 Technofutures and Labour Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5

Attendance and class requirements

A 90% attendance rate is required.

Tor this unit, this means attending 90% of tutorials in person and 90% of lectures in person or if this is not possible, indicating that you have watched them on line.

Failure to attend 50% of classes could result in your case being taken to the Board of Examiners.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All the readings can be accessed via the Canvas site.

 

 

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Conceptualise a social sciences question in relation to real world issues.
  • LO2. Locate contemporary social and political transformations against a broader historical, political and cultural background.
  • LO3. Undertake academic literature review on a social sciences topic/question.
  • LO4. Undertake a general review of resources relating to a social sciences topic/question including government, NGO, legal resources
  • LO5. Participate in structured class discussions on readings and ideas introduced in the course.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Workshops have been brought forward to allow more time for the report writing.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.