Skip to main content
Unit of study_

WMST6902: Arguing the Point

Semester 1, 2021 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This unit introduces students to some practices, methods, writing styles and forms of argumentation relevant to research in Gender and Cultural Studies. Through the study of different examples, students are encouraged to develop their own research practices and writing skills. The unit caters to students in the early stages of thesis conception and development. Students who have already begun writing their thesis will be encouraged to experiment with different ways of arguing and writing their research. Students who are just starting will have the opportunity to develop their ideas.

Unit details and rules

Unit code WMST6902
Academic unit Gender and Cultural Studies
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Fiona Allon, fiona.allon@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Long essay
A substantial piece of writing. Several options.
40% Formal exam period
Due date: 16 Jun 2021 at 23:59
3000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO5
Assignment Skills exercise
A short task building skills in close analysis of writing or argument.
30% Week 07
Due date: 20 Apr 2021 at 23:59
1500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO2
Assignment Peer-learning task
An exercise designed to develop peer support and review networks.
30% Week 12
Due date: 24 May 2021 at 23:59
2000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO2

Assessment summary

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

 

Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences

Grade Descriptors for Postgraduate Coursework in Arts and Social Sciences

 

These grade descriptors apply to all postgraduate assessments, coursework as well as dissertations.

These descriptors are broad indices. They are not intended to replace departmental statements on marking criteria, which should be made available to students in accordance with Academic Board guidelines on standards-referenced assessment, and should include detailed, discipline-specific grade descriptors.

 

The Grade Descriptors

85-100: High Distinction

Work that demonstrates a high or very high level of proficiency in the methodologies, subject matter, and modes of expression and argumentation appropriate to the field or fields studied, and demonstrates the potential to undertake a research degree.

In many fields of the humanities and social sciences, a mark in this range can indicate thorough and possibly innovative research; wide and deep reading of the relevant scholarly literature; and a high level of problem-solving capacity and/or skill in interpreting data, documentary evidence, fieldwork, literary texts, or works of art.

In work written in a language other than English, a mark in this range indicates an excellent level of grammatical accuracy, syntactical sophistication, and nuance in use of vocabulary and register.

 

75-84: Distinction

Work that demonstrates a generally sound to very good knowledge of the methodologies, subject matter, and modes of expression and argumentation appropriate to the field or fields studied.

In many fields of the humanities and social sciences, a mark in this range can indicate solid research; a firm grasp of the relevant scholarly literature; and competent problem-solving and/or interpretations of data, documentary evidence, fieldwork, literary texts, or works of art. However, work in this range may also show evidence of a higher level of independent thought combined with some significant lapses in research or expression.

In work written in a language other than English, a mark in this range indicates a high standard of grammatical accuracy with few mistakes and only very rare basic errors, with vocabulary and syntax varied and expression highly coherent and well structured.

 

65-74: Credit

Work that demonstrates an acceptable but limited performance in the methodologies, subjects, and/or languages studied.

In many fields of the humanities and social sciences, a mark in this range can indicate an adequate general knowledge of the subject from the reading of both primary material and secondary literature, straightforward argumentation, and clear expression. A mark in this range may also reflect a superior performance in one or more of these areas combined with serious lapses in others.

In work written in a language other than English, a mark in this range indicates a good standard of grammatical accuracy, albeit with some mistakes, including occasional basic ones; the work shows a good grasp of complex sentence structures and an appropriately varied vocabulary.

 

50-64: Pass

Work which may be only barely above the standard of undergraduate work in the field studied. A mark in the 50-59 range indicates a basic but limited understanding of the methodologies and subject matter of the field or fields studied, and skills in problem-solving, argumentation and expression that are only just adequate for postgraduate-level study and research. A mark in the 60-64 range may sometimes reflect work that is more than adequate in some of these respects but shows significant deficiencies in others.

 

Below 50%: Fail

Work that does not meet the basic standards for postgraduate work in the field studied. A mark in this range indicates an inadequate understanding of the methodologies and subject matter of the field or fields studied, and significant deficiencies in argument and expression.

Postgraduate Coursework Grade Descriptors October 2011

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

Work not submitted on or before the due date are subject to a penalty of 2% per day late. Refer to http://sydney.edu.au/arts/current_students/late_work.shtml for the Policy on Late Work.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 What is a thesis? Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 02 Scoping your thesis 1: Aims, limits, approaches Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 03 Scoping your thesis 2: The literature review Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 04 Research thesis workshop Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 05 Finding a voice 1: Writing Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 06 Finding a voice 2: Arguing Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 07 Finding a voice 3: Mastery and critique Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 08 Finding a voice 4: Stories, anecdotes, experience and using the “I” Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 09 Structuring a long piece of work Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 10 Methods 1: “Doing theory” Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 11 Methods 2: What is Critique? Seminar (2 hr) LO2 LO5
Week 12 Methods 3: Ethnography and auto-ethnography Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO5
Week 13 Research ethics Seminar (2 hr) LO5

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: According to Faculty Board Resolutions, students in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences are expected to attend 90% of their classes. If you attend less than 50% of classes, regardless of the reasons, you may be referred to the Examiner’s Board. The Examiner’s Board will decide whether you should pass or fail the unit of study if your attendance falls below this threshold.
  • Preparation: Students should commit to spend approximately three hours’ preparation time (reading, studying, homework, essays, etc.) for every hour of scheduled instruction.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Essential readings can be accessed in one of two ways:

1. Digitally, via the e-reserve link on the Canvas site.

2. In hard copy, by purchasing a unit reader from the Copy Centre. The best way to do this is to order online, to avoid the queues:
https://www.publishpartner.com.au/visit-the-copy-centre?sect=VistTheCopyCentre The reader is the same for Honours students and postgraduates but the publishers will usually do it under a single code (either GCST4200 or WMST6902). If you can't find it under one code, try the other.

Some further readings have also been made available via the library’s e-reserve system.

 

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. demonstrate a better understanding of the mechanisms of different disciplinary-based writing and argumentation, as well as that of interdisciplinary research
  • LO2. demonstrate improved writing and argumentation skills
  • LO3. demonstrate a wider appreciation of writing practices
  • LO4. demonstrate the capacity to give and receive constructive criticism
  • LO5. demonstrate an awareness of some critical debates within Gender and Cultural Studies.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This unit has run to great acclaim for many years. Students find it invaluable in helping them develop their thesis topic, try out ideas, and develop a sense of cohort with their peers. I have not made any amendments based on student feedback, but I have altered the unit quite a bit over the last couple of years in order to include more material on indigeneity and race. For 2020 I have introduced a new week on critique. I frequently change the readings to make use of new texts on writing as they emerge, and to vary examples of academic writing styles.

Detailed schedule of topics and readings is available to anyone with a unikey on https://sydney.instructure.com/courses/19733/assignments/syllabus or by emailing ruth.barcan@sydney.edu.au

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.