Autonomous vehicles and implications for future transport systems

2 February 2017
From our ‘Thinking outside the box’ series
The rapid development of autonomous vehicles (AV) has prompted considerable speculation on how these vehicles will ‘revolutionise’ the future of cities’ transport systems.

By David Hensher, Chinh Ho and Richard Ellison

The rapid development of autonomous vehicles (AV) has prompted considerable speculation on how these vehicles will ‘revolutionise’ the future of cities’ transport systems. It has been suggested that a large-scale adoption of AV would lead to safer roads, congestion-free cities and more public spaces as vehicles can be shared, and hence fewer parking spaces are needed. However, it is far from clear if these visions are likely to be realised and what this might imply for the future transport networks and policy agendas. Recent comments by the NSW Minister of Transport who stated “we have got on-demand movies, we want on-demand transport” 1 and “if I look at the ways in which we’re going to have to change our transport planning, our road networks, the way in which insurance is going to change, all of this is going to happen incredibly quickly and I want us to be front and centre” 2 underline how extensive the transport systems will change and how critical it is to plan for these changes. If these visions turn out to be the case, questions for which clarity is needed include:

  • How AV will change the car ownership model? Will people move away from a private model (outright ownership) toward a sharing model? The latter ranges from fractional ownership (buy equity in a car-share brand) to own and share (own an autonomous vehicle but lease it out when not using) to Mobility-as-a-Service (subscribe to a mobility plan and a smart mobility app will manage the rest, including planning journeys, booking a shared-car or a taxi, paying fees, and billing) to pay-per-ride (much like Uber with driverless cars)
  • Will total car kilometres and traffic congestions increase or decrease in the driverless era and whether the effect on congestion is likely to be as significant as claimed?
  • What are the implications for the delivering of public transport services and the planning of future transport infrastructures?
  • What are the optimal operational measures to tackle the transitional period of transport systems from all human-driven vehicles to fully automated vehicles?

Existing planning and operational management tools are largely unsuited to answering these questions because they rely on several assumptions about how investments in mobility through car ownership and licence holding influence the way people travel, how much people are willing to pay to save wasteful travel time, how the public transport network is structured and operated, and how traffic congestion control is currently implemented in cities. All of these assumptions may no longer hold in the driverless era, when one does not need to own a car or hold a driving licence to be able to use a car, when one can work or do worthwhile activities while travelling and hence travel time is no longer that wasteful, and when public transport can be ‘ordered’ in advance. In addition, the transitional mixture of human-driven cars and AV further exacerbates the complexity and uncertainties of transport systems that entails devising innovative and holistic planning and operational models.

The likely effects of AV on car use and congestion are of particular interest. To accurately predict these impacts, we need to rethink and restructure planning and operation systems in an innovative way. Currently congestion acts as a major disincentive to car use as congestion is perceived to be both highly variable and a waste of time. In contrast, widespread use of AV would be expected to reduce the variability of travel time as this can be accurately predicted before each journey. Furthermore, although congestion is perhaps unlikely to be eliminated entirely, AV also provide the opportunity for time spent in cars to be used productively. Thus, car users may be more tolerable to congestion and the car becomes more attractive than it already is, perhaps prompting a switch from public transport. This has a significant implication on how future transport initiatives are evaluated, particularly in terms of user benefits. Transport infrastructure is currently evaluated on the basis that savings in travel times and reliability are highly valued because time spent travelling is considered ‘lost’. Yet, turning time spent in a car into productive time will mean the value of travel time savings will be less and passengers may become less sensitive to congestion. Equally, AV with no passengers will not perceive any benefits from reduced travel time but will still contribute to congestion and incur costs of running. The proportion of AV running empty would therefore be expected to have a substantial effect on congestion levels and this effect will be simulated in this project with new data collected and models developed.

Furthermore, the increasing deployment trend of AV and connected Vehicle-Infrastructure technologies provides potentials to develop analytically tractable and in-depth understanding of mobility patterns in multi-modal transport networks. This enables us to establish holistic and quantitative management schemes to efficiently monitor and control traffic congestion within real-time optimisation frameworks with more realistic and multi-modal representation of traffic dynamics.

Also of significant interest to future transport and infrastructure planning and investment is how these changes will alter the nature of road requirements and the transport network, and how this will interact with the push for Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS). MaaS is a demand-responsive resolution for a user-oriented and tailor-made transport service that provides flexible and personalized mobility services to passengers. MaaS platform leverages dynamic car- and ride-sharing opportunities within an electrified (and possibly automated) fleet along with a dynamic faring policy to optimize network-wide travel costs. Specifically, the width of traffic lanes that is mainly driven by safety considerations may be narrowed and the design of intersections may be changed, both increasing the road capacity. In addition, AV may have almost perfect information and the ability to communicate with other AV to optimally spread themselves across the network, thereby increasing the road capacity further. Finally, with the rollout of autonomous vehicles, MaaS providers will be able to bring all modes of transport into a single mobility package and allow all people to subscribe (including those who do not hold a valid driving licence). This coupled with no parking worries will open a much bigger market for MaaS which will significantly change the ways people travel. Incorporating these changes into planning and optimization processes and tools will require a revision of different assumptions, and the development of new models to forecast travel demand and manage traffic across the network.

  1. 2nd November, 2016 -
  2. 26th October, 2016 -

Related articles

06 May 2024

Should supply chain leaders invest in generative AI solutions?

Dr Jyotirmoyee Bhattacharjya provides three basic questions for supply chain leaders to ask to detrmine if they should invest in generative AI solutions.
02 April 2024

E-Scooters: Coming Soon to a Street Near You or Not?

Stephen Greaves (ITLS, University of Sydney) and Geoff Rose (ITS, Monash University) discuss how the proliferation of e-scooters in Australia has brought about legislative challenges, with confusing rules and safety concerns, revealing a disconnect between existing regulations and public expectations. The evolving landscape calls for a thorough examination of infrastructure, licensing, registration, and insurance to ensure the responsible and sustainable integration of e-scooters into the urban transportation system.
04 March 2024

Making cost-benefit analysis more relevant when reducing social exclusion matters

Professor John Stanley explores the recent shift in land use transport (LUT) policy priorities towards reducing social exclusion, highlighting the challenge in cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of monetising societal benefits.