The items on this page have been carefully curated by Sydney Voice Lab. We utilise these resources daily in our teaching, clinical practice, and research. Wherever possible, we have made these items available for download or provided direct links for easy access.
In instances where providing direct access has not been possible, we have included links to the journal articles from which these resources can be sourced.
Bridge2Practice is an online educational platform designed to bridge the gap from classroom to clinic. This platform offers students unlimited practice in clinical assessment of real-world cases. In doing so, it more effectively prepares students for clinical practice.
Winner of the Wharburton Q-Stars Bronze award in 2015 and with almost 10,000 users to date, this unique application is designed specifically for learning practical skills in health and other service domains.
Key benefits of Bridge2Practice include:
Bridge2Practice can be used for developing practical skills across a range of health disciplines including, but not limited to, speech-language pathology, physiotherapy, and exercise and sports physiology.
Bridge2Practice features a freely available educational tool that enables students to practice using auditory-perceptual rating tools, CAPE-V (consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice) and GRBAS (grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain).
Uniquely, learners can practice using these tools to evaluate a variety of real-world recordings1 and receive instant feedback comparing their assessment with expert evaluations.
The laryngoscopy rating tool is a freely available educational tool in Bridge2Practice that can offer learners unlimited practice in the evaluation of laryngoscopic examinations.
Note for educators: To set up this learning activity, you will need to have your own laryngoscopic videos. Additionally, you will need to ensure you have obtained permissions from patients to use these videos for educational purposes.
Below are links to tools designed to facilitate the assessment of individuals. Sydney Voice Lab routinely uses these tools in clinical practice and research:
Acoustic analysis normative data provides essential benchmarks for understanding typical voice characteristics across different populations. Whether you are engaged in clinical practice or research in the field of laryngeal and voice disorders, the normative values provided in this section serve as a fundamental reference for evaluation and comparison.
Below are links to PROMs that Sydney Voice Lab routinely uses in clinical practice and research.
Normative data provides essential benchmarks for interpreting your PROMs. Whether you are engaged in clinical practice or research in the field of laryngeal and voice disorders, the normative values provided in this section serve as a fundamental reference for the evaluation of individuals' health and wellbeing.
Below are links to tools tailored for scientific study and clinical investigation that Sydney Voice Lab routinely uses in research:
1. Walden, P. R. (2022). Perceptual Voice Qualities Database (PVQD): Database characteristics. Journal of Voice, 36(6), 875.e15-875.e23. doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.10.001.
2. Voicecraft International. (2016). Copyrighted material on the assessment of voice. Unpublished material, Voicecraft International.
3. Fairbanks, G. (1960). Voice and articulation drillbook, 2nd edn. New York: Harper & Row. pp 124-139.
4. Kempster, G. B., Gerratt, B. R., Abbott, K. V., Barkmeier-Kraemer, J., & Hillman, R. E. (2009). Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: Development of a standardized clinical protocol. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(2), 124-132. doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/08-0017).
5. Payten, C.L., Chiapello, G., Weir, K.A., & Madill, C.J. (2022). Frameworks, terminology and definitions used for the classification of voice disorders: A scoping review. Journal of Voice. 38(5), 1070-1087. doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.02.009.
6. Payten, C.L., Nguyen, D.D., Novakovic, D., O'Neill, J., Chacon, A.M., Weir, K.A., & Madill, C.J. (2022). Telehealth voice assessment by speech-language pathologists during a global pandemic using principles of a primary contact model: an observational cohort study protocol. BMJ Open, 12(1), e052518. doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052518.
7. Rosen, C. A., Lee, A. S., Osborne, J., Zullo, T., & Murry, T. (2009). Development and validation of the Voice Handicap Index-10. The Laryngoscope, 114(9), 1549-1556. doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200409000-00009.
8. Cohen, S. M., Statham, M., Rosen, C. A., & Zullo, T. (2009). Development and validation of the Singing Voice Handicap‐10. The Laryngoscope, 119(9), 1864-1869. doi.org/10.1002/lary.20580.
9. Zur, K. B., Cotton, S., Kelchner, L., Baker, S., Weinrich, B., & Lee, L. (2006;2007;). Pediatric Voice Handicap Index (pVHI): A new tool for evaluating pediatric dysphonia. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 71(1), 77-82. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.09.004.
10. Bach, K. K., Belafsky, P. C., Wasylik, K., Postma, G. N., & Koufman, J. A. (2005). Validity and reliability of the Glottal Function Index. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 131(11), 961-964. doi.org/10.1001/archotol.131.11.961.
11. Shembel, A. C., Rosen, C. A., Zullo, T. G., & Gartner‐Schmidt, J. L. (2013). Development and validation of the Cough Severity Index: A severity index for chronic cough related to the upper airway. The Laryngoscope, 123(8), 1931-1936. doi.org/10.1002/lary.23916.
12. Belafsky, P. C., Postma, G. N., & Koufman, J. A. (2002). Validity and reliability of the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI). Journal of Voice, 16(2), 274-277.
doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(02)00097-8.
13. Vertigan, A. E., Bone, S. L., & Gibson, P. G. (2014). Development and validation of the Newcastle Laryngeal Hypersensitivity Questionnaire. Cough, 10(1).
doi.org/10.1186/1745-9974-10-1.
14. Arias Vergara, T., Madill, C., Nguyen, D., Holik, J., & Döllinger, M. (2024). VOAT: Voice Onset Analysis Tool. SoftwareX, 27, 101802. doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2024.101802.
15. Bi, M., Nguyen, D.D., Arias-Vergara, T., Döllinger, M., Holik, J., & Madill, C.J. (2024). Effects of instructed laryngeal manipulation on vocal rise time. Journal of Voice. In press. doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.10.009.
16. Drinnan M. (2012). Newcastle assessment of pitch discrimination. Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
17. Nguyen, D.D., Chacon, A.M., Novakovic, D., Hodges, N.J., Carding, P.N., & Madill, C.J. (2022). Pitch discrimination testing in patients with a voice disorder. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(3), 584. doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030584.