Unit outline_

AMME5022: Capstone Project B Extended

Semester 1, 2026 [Supervision] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

The capstone project requires the student to plan and execute a substantial research-based project, using their technical and communication skills to design, evaluate, implement, analyse and theorise about developments that contribute to professional practice thus demonstrating the achievement of AQF Level 9. Students are required to carry out a defined piece of independent research in a setting and in a manner that fosters the development of engineering research skills. These skills include the capacity to define a research question, showing how it relates to existing knowledge, identifying the tools needed to investigate the question, carrying out the research in a systematic way, analysing the results obtained and presenting the outcomes in a report that is clear, coherent and logically structured. Capstone project is undertaken across two semesters of enrolment, in two successive Units of Study of 6 credits points each. Capstone Project A covers first steps of thesis research starting with development of research proposal. Project B covers the second of stage writing up and presenting the research results. Students are asked to write a thesis based on a research project, which is very often related to some aspect of a staff member's research interests. Some projects will be experimental in nature, others may involve computer-based simulation, feasibility studies or the design, construction and testing of equipment. Direction of thesis work may be determined by the supervisor, however the student is expected to make a significant contribution to the direction of the project, and the student is responsible for the execution of the practical work and the general layout and content of the thesis itself. The final thesis must be the student's individual work, although research is sometimes conducted in the framework of a group project shared with others. Students undertaking research on this basis will need to take care in ensuring the individual quality of their own research work and the final thesis submission. The thesis will be judged on the extent and quality of the student's original work and particularly how critical, perceptive and constructive he or she has been in assessing his/her work and that of others. Students will also be required to present the results of their findings to their peers and supervisors as part of a seminar program. A thesis at this level will represent a contribution to professional practice or research, however the timeframe available for the thesis also needs to considered when developing project scopes. Indeed, a key aim of the thesis is to specify a research topic that arouses sufficient intellectual curiosity, and presents an appropriate range and diversity of technical and conceptual challenges, while remaining manageable and allowing achievable outcomes within the time and resources available. It is important that the topic be of sufficient scope and complexity to allow a student to learn their craft and demonstrate their research skills. Equally imperative is that the task not be so demanding as to elude completion. Finally the ability to plan such a project to achieve results within constraints and the identification of promising areas and approaches for future research is a key assessment criterion.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic
Credit points 12
Prerequisites
? 
(24 credit points in the Master of Engineering and WAM >=70) or (96 credit points in the Master of Professional Engineering and WAM >=70) or (48 credit points from MPE(Accel) program and WAM >=70)
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
AMME5021 or AMME5222 or AMME5223 or BMET5020 or BMET5021 or BMET5022 or BMET5222 or BMET5223 or BMET5010
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Paul Briozzo, paul.briozzo@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 31 March 2026
Type Description Weight Due Length Use of AI
Q&A following presentation, submission or placement Poster Presentation
(Thesis/Capstone/Dissertation B): Oral exam at the poster presentation in the form of Q&A
45% Formal exam period
Due date: 09 Jun 2026 at 23:59

Closing date: 09 Jun 2026
20 minutes. AI prohibited
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Presentation Poster Presentation
Poster Presentation; Visual Aids; (1 page A1) (demonstrations.or additional media are possible)
5% Formal exam period
Due date: 09 Jun 2026 at 23:59

Closing date: 09 Jun 2026
- AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO7
Presentation Presentation/Seminar - Previous Semester
Presentation of progress - Submitted in the previous semester.
10% Multiple weeks Approx. 10 min. AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO7
Written work Proposal
Written work - Submitted in the previous semester.
10% Week 05 - AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO1 LO3 LO4 LO6
Peer or expert observation or supervision (Thesis/Capstone/Dissertation B):ProjectManagement and Problem Solving
(Thesis/Capstone/Dissertation B): Project Management and Problem Solving performance during the project
10% Week 13
Due date: 29 May 2026 at 23:59

Closing date: 12 Jun 2026
- AI prohibited
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO4
Dissertation or thesis Capstone Project B Extended
Dissertation or thesis
20% Week 13
Due date: 29 May 2026 at 23:59

Closing date: 12 Jun 2026
See Canvas AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6

Assessment summary

In the following unit Capstone/Thesis B, assessment will include a poster presentation with oral exam and a written thesis. Below is a guideline of the assessment structure.
Poster presentation with oral exam: (Capstone/Thesis B). Students will make a poster presentation to other students and staff members. An oral exam with two examinars will take place
during the poster session in the form of Q&A. Evaluation will be based on the quality and coherence of the poster presentation, quality of subject matter and the handling of questions from
examiners.
Thesis: Thesis submission (Capstone/Thesis B). Thesis is submitted online via Canvas and must include a statement identifying the specific contributions of the student and others to the
work. Thesis content requirements are set out in the School’s Marking Rubrics, which provides the basis for thesis marking (see AMME thesis information page). Typical theses would not
exceed 67 pages (excluding preliminary pages, references and appendices). Exact format requirements will be detailed in Capstone/Thesis B. Students should closely consult their supervisor
as well as the Marking Rubrics regarding the appropriate content, organisation and formatting. A mark > 85% (HD) would generally only be awarded for work which can be published in a
reputable journal or conference, or designs at a level suitable for exhibition or submission to a reputable design competition or publication.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

 

High distinction

85 - 100

Awarded when students demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at an exceptional standard.

Distinction

75 - 84

Awarded when students demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at a very high standard.

Credit

65 - 74

Awarded when students demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at a high standard.

Pass

50 - 64

Awarded when students demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at an acceptable standard.

Fail

0 - 49

Awarded when students do not meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

 For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI)

You can use generative AI tools for open assessments. Restrictions on AI use apply to secure, supervised assessments used to confirm if students have met specific learning outcomes.

Refer to the assessment table above to see if AI is allowed, for assessments in this unit and check Canvas for full instructions on assessment tasks and AI use.

If you use AI, you must always acknowledge it. Misusing AI may lead to a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

5% per day late penalty will be applied in accordance with the Assessment Procedures 2011. 100% late penalty will be applied for a missed presentation/seminar session.

Academic integrity

The University expects students to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

Our website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. This includes advice on how to avoid common breaches of academic integrity. Ensure that you have completed the Academic Honesty Education Module (AHEM) which is mandatory for all commencing coursework students

Penalties for serious breaches can significantly impact your studies and your career after graduation. It is important that you speak with your unit coordinator if you need help with completing assessments.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Ongoing Independent research for 20 hours per week during the semester. Self-directed learning (260 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 12 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 240-300 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Formulate and plan a personal research project.
  • LO2. Demonstrate originality, ingenuity and initiative in dealing with critical research issues.
  • LO3. Demonstrate in-depth knowledge of a specialised area within the discipline.
  • LO4. Formulate an appropriate method for investigating a specific research question.
  • LO5. Analyse data, draw appropriate conclusions and present those conclusions in context, with due consideration of methods and assumptions involved.
  • LO6. Document and report research work undertaken in a format appropriate for academic literature with correct referencing.
  • LO7. Deliver a research presentation that is clear, confident and engaging to an academic audience.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

In the following semesters, we will - continue with the challenging research/design driven projects - improve the logistics and implementation of the new thesis format - explore the option of a 'bootcamp' session at the beginning of the semester, to facilitate peer interaction, and improve communication with students, provide clearer instructions regarding the process and deadlines - while we currently offer a combined workshop with BioMed on literature review, we will also explore additional online resources to help with literature review writing

Work, health and safety

Appropriate risk assessments and lab inductions as required, consult your supervisor for details.

Disclaimer

Important: the University of Sydney regularly reviews units of study and reserves the right to change the units of study available annually. To stay up to date on available study options, including unit of study details and availability, refer to the relevant handbook.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.