Unit outline_

AMST2608: Sex and Law in Modern America

Semester 1, 2026 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This unit of study explores how the law has shaped concepts of gender and sexuality in the twentieth and twenty-first century United States and, in turn, how women, queer and nonbinary people, and their allies have challenged forms of discrimination embedded in law. From the struggle to protect reproductive rights to prohibitions on interracial marriage and the policing of sexuality and gender identity, sex and the law have always been intertwined in the United States. Topics covered include Second and Third Wave feminisms, the history of eugenic sterilisation, sexual harassment law and #MeToo, and the reproductive rights and LGBTQ rights movements.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit United States Studies Centre
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
12 credit points at 1000 level in American Studies or 12 credit points at 1000 level in History or 12 credit points at 1000 level in Gender Studies
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Kathryn Schumaker, kathryn.schumaker@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 31 March 2026
Type Description Weight Due Length Use of AI
Oral exam hurdle task Oral Exam
Students will be examined on the policy memo and be asked to explain their approach to the topic and defend their policy recommendation.
20% Formal exam period 15 minutes (oral) AI prohibited
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Written work hurdle task Research Policy Memo
Students will write a policy memo that examines the context of a pressing issue of the student’s choice regarding sex and law in modern America. The memo will make a policy recommendation for state or local-level action in response to a particular problem
40% Formal exam period
Due date: 15 Jun 2026 at 23:59
2000 words AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Portfolio or journal Early Feedback Task Tutorial Question
Students will write 2-3 questions for tutorial meant to demonstrate understanding of lecture and assigned readings
0% Week 02
Due date: 01 Mar 2026 at 23:59
200 words AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2
Written work Short essay
Students will write a short essay in response to prompts provided by the instructor. The essay will demonstrate critical thinking skills as applied to lectures and assigned readings for the unit.
20% Week 07
Due date: 10 Apr 2026 at 23:59
1000 words AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Written work Research Proposal
Students will write a brief research proposal that identifies a key question for research, 5-10 sources for consideration, and a hypothesis.
10% Week 10
Due date: 01 May 2026 at 23:59
500 words AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO4
Contribution Participation-- contribution
Students will engage in active, informed participation in tutorial and lecture.
10% Weekly Weekly AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
hurdle task = hurdle task ?
early feedback task = early feedback task ?

Early feedback task

This unit includes an early feedback task, designed to give you feedback prior to the census date for this unit. Details are provided in the Canvas site and your result will be recorded in your Marks page. It is important that you actively engage with this task so that the University can support you to be successful in this unit.

Assessment summary

Students will compose a tutorial question, a short essay, a research proposal, and a policy memo. Students will also give a final oral examination.

Assessment criteria

High Distinction (85-100)—The essay is well organized, clear, and precise in regards to thesis, evidence, and writing.  It contains a strong, persuasive thesis.  Analysis of the documents involves insights that go beyond basic facts and reveal important themes or ideas that link primary sources or put them in tension.  The student is also creative in their examination of the documents and integrates quotations effectively and seamlessly.  Judgments tend to be subtle and reflect an awareness of the complexities of the subject.  The essay is well organized with clear topic sentences. The essay contains no writing errors and makes expert use of citations. 

Distinction (75-84)The essay is well organized, clear, and precise in regards to thesis, evidence, and writing.  It contains a clear thesis.  Analysis of the documents is thoughtful and reflects complexity and/or contingency.  The paper is well organized with clear topic sentences. The paper contains few or no writing errors and makes proper use of citations. 

Credit (65-74)The essay is organized, coherent, and technically sound, but provides little additional insight.  There might be a weakness in the argument or the student could have done a better job connecting evidence to his or her thesis.  Furthermore, although the student provides an effective overview of primary documents, perhaps they could have done a better job connecting the analysis to the bigger question of what these documents can tell us about sex, gender, and law. The essay uses topic sentences inconsistently. The essay also includes some writing, grammatical, or citation errors.

Pass (50-64)The essay reflects a basic understanding of the subject, but it displays an obvious thesis.  Although the paper summarizes the documents, it fails to incorporate specific examples, which makes the paper read more like a simple review of the documents rather than a critical analysis of them.  The student might have integrated quotations in parts of the paper but not in others.  Finally, the essay may include several common writing/grammatical mistakes.

Fail (0-49)The essay displays some relevant material, but it is generally characterized by weak organization, a vague thesis, numerous writing/factual errors, or confusion.  Although the paper discusses some documents, it lacks sufficient evidence for an essay of this scope.  The student demonstrates little interaction with the documents and provides a poor argument (or none whatsoever).  The paper may include factual errors or value judgments/opinions, further revealing limited interaction with the documents. The paper may also include numerous writing or grammatical mistakes and display poor use of citations. 

For more information see guide to grades.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI)

You can use generative AI tools for open assessments. Restrictions on AI use apply to secure, supervised assessments used to confirm if students have met specific learning outcomes.

Refer to the assessment table above to see if AI is allowed, for assessments in this unit and check Canvas for full instructions on assessment tasks and AI use.

If you use AI, you must always acknowledge it. Misusing AI may lead to a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

-5 percent per day

Academic integrity

The University expects students to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

Our website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. This includes advice on how to avoid common breaches of academic integrity. Ensure that you have completed the Academic Honesty Education Module (AHEM) which is mandatory for all commencing coursework students

Penalties for serious breaches can significantly impact your studies and your career after graduation. It is important that you speak with your unit coordinator if you need help with completing assessments.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Sex and Gender in America Lecture (2 hr)  
Week 02 Roots of Sex Discrimination Lecture (2 hr)  
Roots of Sex Discrimination Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 03 First and Second Wave Feminisms Lecture (2 hr)  
First and Second Wave Feminisms Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 04 Race and Marriage in Jim Crow America Lecture (2 hr)  
Race and Marriage in Jim Crow America Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 05 Eugenics and the Right to Reproduce Lecture (2 hr)  
Eugenics and the Right to Reproduce Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 06 Sexuality and Citizenship Lecture (2 hr)  
Sexuality and Citizenship Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 07 The Equal Rights Amendment Lecture (2 hr)  
The Equal Rights Amendment Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 08 The Law of Sexual Slander Lecture (2 hr)  
The Law of Sexual Slander Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 09 Sex Discrimination in the Workplace Lecture (2 hr)  
Sex Discrimination in the Workplace Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 10 The Rise and Fall of Roe v. Wade Lecture (2 hr)  
Rise and Fall of Roe v. Wade Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 11 Reproductive Rights Post-Roe Lecture (2 hr)  
Reproductive Rights Post-Roe Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 12 #MeToo and Sexual Violence in Trump’s America Lecture (2 hr)  
#MeToo and Sexual Violence in Trump’s America Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 13 Gender Identity at Work and School Lecture (2 hr)  
Gender Identity at Work and School Tutorial (1 hr)  

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Demonstrate an understanding of how legal institutions and concepts shape gender and sexuality in the United States
  • LO2. Identify the cultural, political, and legal roots of gender and sex discrimination and the policing of gender and sexuality
  • LO3. Analyse the intersections of race, gender, sexuality, and the law in the modern United States
  • LO4. Employ a multidisciplinary lens to examine issues of gender and sexuality, including historical, sociological, and policy approaches
  • LO5. Demonstrate critical reading and writing skills to analyse texts, images, and other media
  • LO6. Apply research capabilities and critical analysis skills in oral and written formats

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This unit is being offered for the first time. Student feedback will be used to improve the unit following the semester's end.

Disclaimer

Important: the University of Sydney regularly reviews units of study and reserves the right to change the units of study available annually. To stay up to date on available study options, including unit of study details and availability, refer to the relevant handbook.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.