Skip to main content
Unit outline_

ARCH9002: Urban Design Studio: Urban Project

Semester 1, 2025 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

Design studios are the heart of the urban design program. Values, knowledge and skills acquired in other units and from previous experience are supplemented and enhanced, and applied creatively to both the investigation and development phases of design projects at an urban scale. Urban Design Studio: Urban Project is concerned with the design development for a local urban project that explores how a specific design intervention can be a catalyst to broader urban change. Projects are carefully chosen to explore complex local urban sites or groups of sites and to generate proposals for public and private building types, streets, spaces and transport infrastructure that are rigourously informed by design methodologies. Implementation through staging, development controls and guidelines will also be addressed. Inter-disciplinary group work is an essential part of the studio and integrates the broad range of backgrounds and skills of the students while mimicing the reality of practice. The central aim of this unit is to develop illustrative, writing and verbal skills which will enable students to carry out urban design projects such as the preparation of frameworks, master plans and public domain concepts in a professional manner. Students will be expected to demonstrate appropriate problem recognition, investigative, analytical, interpretative, design and presentation skills and abilities on projects of local urban scale. Assessment may also embrace abilities to prepare and interpret project briefs, program proposals and work in groups.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Urban and Regional Planning and Policy
Credit points 12
Prerequisites
? 
ARCH9100
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Deena Ridenour, deena.ridenour@sydney.edu.au
Tutor(s) Deena Ridenour, deena.ridenour@sydney.edu.au
Brendan Randles, brendan.randles@sydney.edu.au
Ian Woodcock, ian.woodcock@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 31 March 2025
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment AI Allowed Master Plan Presentation and Submission
Master Plan Presentation Week 13 (formative) with group scheme and individual urban components; Master Plan Submission (summative) with updated design in response to design jury comments; 10% group and 10% individual
20% Formal exam period
Due date: 06 Jun 2025 at 23:59
15 minutes, 20 slides
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Assignment AI Allowed Design Journal
Design Journal compiling individual work from weeks 1, 3, 4, 6, 10, 12 to illustrate individual design knowledge and contribution to group project
40% Formal exam period
Due date: 06 Jun 2025 at 23:59
Digital submissions - no page limit
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8
Attendance hurdle task AI Allowed Attendance and Studio Preparation
90% attendance at lectures and studio; attendance also include preparation for studio scheduled tasks and activities as described on Canvas in the syllabus
0% Multiple weeks
Due date: 06 Jun 2025 at 00:00
Duration of class
Outcomes assessed: LO9
Assignment Early Feedback Task AI Allowed Precedent Study
Site photos and measured drawings demonstrating accurate urban form and analysis of urban elements
10% Please select a valid week from the list below
Due date: 09 Mar 2025 at 23:59
5 A3 pages
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO8
Assignment AI Allowed Urban Analysis
Urban analysis with summary of opportunities and constraints
10% Week 05
Due date: 23 Mar 2025 at 23:59
15 slides and 12 minute presentation
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3
Assignment AI Allowed Concept Design Presentation (Mid-term)
Concept design for study area based on group precedent and analysis findings
20% Week 08
Due date: 13 Apr 2025 at 23:59
15 slides, 15 minute presentation
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
hurdle task = hurdle task ?
AI allowed = AI allowed ?
early feedback task = early feedback task ?

Assessment summary

  • A1 - Attendance and Studio Preparation: This is a hurdle assignment required to pass the course and to ensure student's attend lectures and studios and are prepared to contribute to the studio design process and group work. Attendance will be recorded in lectures and at the beginning and end of studios along with preparedness for studio.
  • A2a - Precedent Study: This assignment is an individual precedent study illustrating the context, urban form and design elements for a specific part of the city. The intent is to demonstrate student's drawing skills and accurate spatial representation of urban form. 
  • A2b - Urban Analysis: This assignment is a group presentation of urban analysis for the study area which will culminate in a synthesis of the sites opportunties and constraints. 
  • A3 - Cocept Design Presentation, Mid-term: This assignment presents a group concept design for the study area based on urban precedent research and the physical attributes of the site.  
  • A4 - Master Plan Presentation: This assignment includes two parts a) presentation of the developed master plan proposal to a guest design jury (formative); and b) a final submission of the ameneded presentation slides responding to jury feedback (summative). The master plan include group coordination for the whole study area and individual design development for specific components. 
  • A5 - Design Journal: This assignment is an individual design journal maintained throughout the course and demonstrating group contribution, individual design development skills and achievement of the course learning outcomes. It documents specific tasks during the term as outlined in the course syllabus.   
  • Peer reviews of group contribution are also submitted at mid-term and end-term.

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Work of outstanding quality, demonstrating mastery of the learning outcomes assessed.
The work shows significant innovation, experimentation, critical analysis, synthesis, insight,
creativity, and/or exceptional skill.

Distinction

75 - 84

Work of excellent quality, demonstrating a sound grasp of the learning outcomes
assessed. The work shows innovation, experimentation, critical analysis, synthesis,
insight, creativity, and/or superior skill.

Credit

65 - 74

Work of good quality, demonstrating more than satisfactory achievement of the learning
outcomes assessed, or work of excellent quality for a majority of the learning outcomes
assessed.

Pass

50 - 64

Work demonstrating satisfactory achievement of the learning outcomes assessed.

Fail

0 - 49

Work that does not demonstrate satisfactory achievement of one or more of the learning
outcomes assessed.

For more information see guide to grades.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

Except for supervised exams or in-semester tests, you may use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessments unless expressly prohibited by your unit coordinator. 

For exams and in-semester tests, the use of AI and automated writing tools is not allowed unless expressly permitted in the assessment instructions. 

The icons in the assessment table above indicate whether AI is allowed – whether full AI, or only some AI (the latter is referred to as “AI restricted”). If no icon is shown, AI use is not permitted at all for the task. Refer to Canvas for full instructions on assessment tasks for this unit. 

Your final submission must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of automated writing tools or generative AI, and any material generated that you include in your final submission must be properly referenced. You may be required to submit generative AI inputs and outputs that you used during your assessment process, or drafts of your original work. Inappropriate use of generative AI is considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply. 

The Current Students website provides information on artificial intelligence in assessments. For help on how to correctly acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the  AI in Education Canvas site

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

As per university policy.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy 2023 reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy 2023. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Multiple weeks Unaccompanied site visit to design project between weeks 2-4 Field trip (0 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Week 01 Lecture: Studio introduction Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO3
Studio brief and topic workshop Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO3 LO6
Week 02 Sydney urbanism Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO4 LO7
Sydney urbanism, case study site visit Field trip (5 hr) LO1 LO4 LO6 LO7
Week 03 Current planning context; Connecting with Country Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO3
Precedent studies, urban context analysis Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO6
Week 04 Urbanity, Density and Walkability Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO7
Summary opportunities and constraints; design implications Tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 05 Urban Design and Coding Lecture (1 hr) LO2 LO4 LO6
Analysis presentations; Brainstorming initial design ideas Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO8
Week 06 Understanding blocks, lots and building types Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO4 LO5 LO7
Precedent Research and Concept Testing Tutorial (5 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 07 Mixing uses and designing built form Lecture (1 hr) LO2 LO5 LO6 LO7
Concept design development, key moves and design principles Studio (5 hr) LO2 LO4 LO5 LO7
Week 08 Concept Design Presentation Studio (6 hr) LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Week 09 Measuring density Lecture (1 hr) LO5 LO6 LO7
Understanding floor space vs form Studio (5 hr) LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8
Week 10 Street and Open Space Design Lecture (1 hr) LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Design scenarios Studio (5 hr) LO5 LO7 LO8 LO9
Week 11 Place Qualities and Human Experience Lecture (1 hr) LO2 LO3 LO6 LO8
Evaluating place qualities; design development Studio (5 hr) LO2 LO3 LO6 LO8 LO9
Week 12 Design Review Lecture (1 hr) LO2 LO8 LO9
Master Plan learnings; Draft Presentation Studio (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Week 13 Final Presentation Studio (6 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9

Attendance and class requirements

Please refer to the Resolutions of the University School: http://sydney.edu.au/handbooks/architecture/rules/faculty_resolutions.shtml

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 12 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 240-300 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Refer to class schedule and weekly modules in Canvas. 

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Methodically investigate, understand and communicate key physical and social characteristics of the existing and planned urban context, and summarise the opportunities and constraints to inform an urban design proposal.
  • LO2. Synthesise analysis findings and design investigations into design objectives and principles to guide and evaluate qualitative and quantitative performance of design propositions.
  • LO3. Develop an appreciation of First Nations people and apply cultural awareness and knowledge of Country to projects.
  • LO4. Demonstrate a basic understanding of movement networks and the implications for connectivity, street design and development density.
  • LO5. Demonstrate an ability to design and document three-dimensional urban form, public spaces, building envelopes and building types across scales from the precinct to the lot.
  • LO6. Demonstrate the role of comparative analysis and the use of good precedents in defining and explaining urban design.
  • LO7. Recognise the basic processes of land development, subdivision, and forms of tenure and ownership and their implications for urban design.
  • LO8. Use appropriate visual and verbal communications to present a well-argued design proposition for a specific stakeholder audience.
  • LO9. Demonstrate ability to apply an urban design methodology to deliver a coordinated and synthesised group proposition across the term.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

The course study area has been refined to reflect the studio project scope and to enable a detailed design resolution at the scale of the street, block, and building types. 3d models are retained to improve students spatial design and visualisation skills. Design journal entries are linked to specific studio preparation requirements and workshop/charettes to support development of individual design skills and contribution to the group design proposal. Design Journal requirements and the increased percentage aims to facilitate individual achievement of the learning outcomes. The introduction of the attendance hurdle assignment ensure students engage with weekly lecture material and its application in studio through hands-on design activities and skill development.

Additional costs

Additional costs may be incurred for travel for site visits and final presentation to Council, and in the purchase of drawing, modelling and presentation materials. Refer to studio materials list on Canvas.

Site visit guidelines

Information will be provided in Canvas

Work, health and safety

Information will be provided in Canvas

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.