Unit outline_

BAEN3011: DIL: Urban

Semester 1, 2026 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

DIL: Urban builds on the content of Living Cities and City Form and Development. It introduces students to planning and design approaches that create future public places and communities. The unit will focus on one case study location selected for how it captures a range of complex contemporary urban issues. With a heavy emphasis on field based work that combines individual and group task, students will apply and develop their skills in strategic planning, urban analysis and design. Students will be challenged as if in a work environment of professionals looking to resolve urban issues and their outputs will be assessed within this context.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Urban and Regional Planning and Policy
Credit points 12
Prerequisites
? 
(BAEN2011 or BAEN2001) and (BAEN2021 or BAEN2002 or BAEN2611)
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Ha Thai, ha.thai@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 31 March 2026
Type Description Weight Due Length Use of AI
Portfolio or journal Assessment 5: Final Portfolio
Portfolio
25% Formal exam period
Due date: 19 Jun 2026 at 23:59
20 pages AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO5
Case studies Early Feedback Task Assessment 1, Part A: Early Feedback Task: Urban Analysis
Portfolio (draft)
0% Week 02
Due date: 08 Mar 2026 at 23:59
2-4 pages AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2
Case studies Assessment 1, Part B: Urban analysis
Portfolio
20% Week 04
Due date: 22 Mar 2026 at 23:59
10 pages AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1
Presentation group assignment Assessment 2: Urban Scheme
Oral presentation with slide deck
15% Week 07
Due date: 17 Apr 2026 at 07:59
15-20 minutes AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
In-person written or creative task Assessment 3: Urban design
Design Charrette
25% Week 09
Due date: 01 May 2026 at 08:00
4h AI prohibited
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3
Presentation group assignment Assessment 4: Masterplan redevelopment
Oral presentation with slide deck
15% Week 13
Due date: 29 May 2026 at 07:59
15-20 minutes AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
group assignment = group assignment ?
early feedback task = early feedback task ?

Assessment summary

Assessment 1: Urban Analysis (20%)

This is an individual assessment. It includes two components: Part A (0%) is an Early Feedback Task (draft portfolio), and Part B (20%) is the Urban Analysis portfolio.

This assessment requires students to investigate the socio-economic, spatial, environmental, and policy layers that shape the selected neighbourhoods, examine their relationships with the broader urban context. Students will work both individually and in groups of three or four. Each week, they are expected to develop their assignment progressively through individual research and collaborative discussion. Interim outputs must be presented to the tutor for review and formative feedback.

Assessment 2: Urban Scheme (15%)

This is a group presentation assessment. It requires students to develop a conceptual urban design scheme for the focused precinct, building upon the findings of the Urban Analysis (Assessment 1). The Urban Scheme translates analytical insights into an integrated spatial proposition that addresses density, diversity, movement, public space, and environmental performance at the precinct scale, which involves several street blocks around a train station. The task aims to develop and assess students’ ability to synthesise theoretical frameworks, site-based evidence, and design thinking into a coherent urban structure that responds to contemporary challenges, including housing affordability, multicultural coexistence, climate adaptation, and transit-oriented development.

Assessment 3: Urban Design – Design Charrette (25%)

This is an individual, secure assessment. It takes the form of an intensive design charrette in which students will develop and test an urban design proposal for a chosen street block within the study area. Building on the Urban Analysis (Assessment 1) and the Urban Scheme (Assessment 2), the charrette focuses on rapid synthesis, collaborative design thinking, and the translation of strategic ideas into spatially resolved urban form and public realm propositions. The charrette simulates professional urban design practice, requiring students to work under time constraints, respond to critique, and iteratively refine their design through drawing, modelling, and discussion.

Assessment 4: Masterplan redevelopment (15%)

This is a group presentation assessment. It requires students to present a Masterplan for the redevelopment of the selected precinct, synthesising analytical insights (Assessment 1), strategic urban structuring (Assessment 2), and spatial design exploration (Assessment 3). The masterplan should articulate a coherent long-term vision for a dense, diverse, transit-oriented, and climate-responsive urban environment, supported by a clearly resolved spatial framework and design narrative. It assesses students’ capacity to integrate theory, policy, and site-specific analysis into a spatially robust and socially inclusive urban design proposal at the precinct scale.

Assessment 5: Final Portfolio (25%)

After the group presentation (Assessment 4), students are expected to work individually and improve their work based on the feedback received. Their individual final portfolio must be submitted via Canvas.

Attendance: Students should be present and engaged in their learning during classes. Late arrival/early departure will be deemed as an absence. Students who do not meet the minimum 90% threshold, who have reasonable evidence to support their absence, may be offered the opportunity to sit an alternative assessment to pass this unit at the discretion of the unit coordinator.

Assessment criteria

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Work of outstanding quality, demonstrating mastery of the learning outcomes assessed. The work shows significant innovation, experimentation, critical analysis, synthesis, insight, creativity, and/or exceptional skill.

Distinction

75 - 84

Work of excellent quality, demonstrating a sound grasp of the learning outcomes assessed. The work shows innovation, experimentation, critical analysis, synthesis, insight, creativity, and/or superior skill.

Credit

65 - 74

Work of good quality, demonstrating more than satisfactory achievement of the learning outcomes assessed, or work of excellent quality for a majority of the learning outcomes assessed.

Pass

50 - 64

Work demonstrating satisfactory achievement of the learning outcomes assessed.

Fail

0 - 49

Work that does not demonstrate satisfactory achievement of one or more of the learning outcomes assessed.

For more information see guide to grades.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI)

You can use generative AI tools for open assessments. Restrictions on AI use apply to secure, supervised assessments used to confirm if students have met specific learning outcomes.

Refer to the assessment table above to see if AI is allowed, for assessments in this unit and check Canvas for full instructions on assessment tasks and AI use.

If you use AI, you must always acknowledge it. Misusing AI may lead to a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

Late penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59 pm on the due date. A deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date. A mark of zero will be awarded for work submitted more than 10 calendar days after the due date. See Assessment Procedures 2024 for more details. https://policyregister.sydney.edu.au/doctract/documentportal/08DE2219DEFCEEEBA727A50F58821ABD

Academic integrity

The University expects students to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

Our website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. This includes advice on how to avoid common breaches of academic integrity. Ensure that you have completed the Academic Honesty Education Module (AHEM) which is mandatory for all commencing coursework students

Penalties for serious breaches can significantly impact your studies and your career after graduation. It is important that you speak with your unit coordinator if you need help with completing assessments.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction Lecture (1 hr) LO1
Ice-breaking activities, and project briefing Tutorial (5 hr) LO1
Week 02 Urban analysis I: themes & scale Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2
Tutorial: Urban Analysis I: Applying scale and key themes Assessment 1, Part A: Early Feedback Task (0%): Draft Urban Analysis portfolio Tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 03 Urban Analysis II: Urban design policy & Opportunities and constraints Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2
Urban Analysis II: Identifying opportunities and constraints and applying policies Tutorial (5 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 04 Introduction Assignment 2: urban scheme Lecture (1 hr) LO2 LO3
Refining findings of Urban Analysis Assessment 1, part B, Urban Analysis Portfolio (20%) Tutorial (5 hr) LO1
Week 05 Creating public space Lecture (1 hr) LO2 LO3
Urban Design charrette – Urban scheme proposal Tutorial (5 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 07 Assessment 2: Group Presentations: Urban Scheme (15%) Assessment (6 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 08 Introduction Assignment 3: urban design proposal Lecture (1 hr) LO2 LO3
Refining urban scheme and developing a design proposal Tutorial (5 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 09 Urban Design Development I: building layouts – Charrette introduction & reflection Lecture (1 hr) LO2 LO3
Assessment 3: Urban design: Design Charrette (25%) Assessment (5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 10 Urban Design Development II: metrics & policies Lecture (1 hr) LO2 LO3
Developing the proposal from the charrette Tutorial (5 hr) LO2 LO3
Week 11 Urban Design Development III: street character Lecture (1 hr) LO3
Refining the development proposal Tutorial (5 hr) LO3 LO4
Week 12 Presenting Assessment 4: narrative Lecture (1 hr) LO5
Consolidating narrative: rationale, concept and proposal Tutorial (5 hr) LO4 LO5
Week 13 Assessment 4: Group Presentation: Masterplan redevelopment (15%) Final Portfolio (25%) due in Examinations Week Assessment (6 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

Attendance and class requirements

Students must attend 90% of this unit's timetabled activities to satisfy attendance requirements, or risk failing the unit. Late arrival or early departure will be deemed as an absence. Students who are unable to attend class due to illness or misadventure must provide reasonable evidence to support their absence to be considered for an exemption from the attendance threshold. In this case, students may be offered the opportunity to complete an alternative assessment to meet the pass requirement for the unit.
Students are expected to be actively engaged in their learning during class. This includes coming to class prepared (e.g. completed readings etc) and making respectful and appropriate contributions to class discussions.
Students should refer to the School of Architecture, Design and Planning resolutions for specific information relating to attendance and participation: https://policyregister.sydney.edu.au/doctract/documentportal/08DE2219FEF9F9588045F2E46B9ACB35

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 12 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 240-300 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Dovey, K. (2010) Becoming Places. Routledge.

Dovey, K. (2016) Urban Design Thinking: A Conceptual Toolkit. Bloomsbury

Hillier, B. (1996) Space is the machine. London: Space Syntax, UCL.

Jacob, J (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House

Meeda, B. (2018) Graphics For Urban Design ( 2nd ed.). ICE Publishing.

Meeda, B., Parkyn, N., Walton, D. S. (2007) Graphics For Urban Design. Thomas Telford Publishing

Oliveira, V. (2022) Urban Morphology: An Introduction to the Study of the Physical Form of Cities. Springer.

Rogers, D., Keane, A., Alizadeh, T., & Nelson, J. (Eds.). (2020). Understanding Urbanism. Springer

Simone, A. M. (2004). People as infrastructure. Public Culture, 16(3), 407–429.

Stevens, Q. & Thai, M.H.H. (2024). Mapping the character of urban districts. Cities, 148, 104853

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Describe and interpret the relationship of basic urban design theory, concepts, terminology, policies, and guidelines to urban design processes, within planning, socio-economic, sustainability, cultural, historical, heritage and community contexts.
  • LO2. Explain and apply core urban design concepts, methods and techniques to understand urban physical and social environments and create an evidence-based evaluation of urban form and quality that meets the standard required to support an urban design proposal.
  • LO3. Using a variety of manual and digital modelling and visual representation techniques, apply urban design knowledge and skills to generate urban form scenarios to evolve analyses and design ideas.
  • LO4. Exercise negotiation and collaboration skills to effectively develop, present and communicate design proposals to a diverse range of audiences.
  • LO5. Create and deliver documentation of final design proposal that meets industry/professional standards.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This is the first time this unit has been offered.

Additional costs

Additional costs may be incurred for site visit travel, drawing, presentation materials, and printing.

Site visit guidelines

Site visit guidelines will be provided via Canvas and studio sessions.

Disclaimer

Important: the University of Sydney regularly reviews units of study and reserves the right to change the units of study available annually. To stay up to date on available study options, including unit of study details and availability, refer to the relevant handbook.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.