Outline

Overview

In this unit of study, we aim to introduce you to systematic reviews and meta-analyses of relevance to healthcare with a particular focus on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. Students can choose to learn in online or normal day (on-campus) mode. All students will work through ten online modules addressing the following topics at an introductory level: defining the research question and developing a protocol, searching the literature, navigating the screening and selection of studies, data extraction techniques, quality assessment and risk of bias evaluation, interpreting meta-analysis results, assessing the quality of evidence using GRADE, understanding reporting standards, and how to critically appraise systematic reviews. Students will have the opportunity to discuss unit of study learning materials in online discussion boards or via weekly (on-campus) tutorials. Readings and other learning materials will be available via eLearning.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit	Public Health
Credit points	6
Prerequisites ?	None
Corequisites ?	CEPI5100 or PUBH5010 or CLTR5001
Prohibitions ?	CEPI5203 or CEPI5102 or CEPI5314 or CLTR5000
Assumed knowledge ?	None
Available to study abroad and exchange students	No

Teaching staff

Coordinator	Melanie Wyld, melanie.wyld@sydney.edu.au

Assessment

The census date for this unit availability is 31 March 2025

Details
Criteria

Type	Description	Weight	Due	Length
Online task	Quiz 1 Quiz consisting of multiple choice questions.	1.5%	Week 02	30 minutes
Outcomes assessed:
Online task	Quiz 2 Quiz consisting of multiple choice questions.	1.5%	Week 03	30 minutes
Outcomes assessed:
Online task	Quiz 3 Quiz consisting of multiple choice questions.	1.5%	Week 04	30 minutes
Outcomes assessed:
Online task	Quiz 4 Quiz consisting of multiple choice questions.	1.5%	Week 05	30 minutes
Outcomes assessed:
Online task	Quiz 5 Quiz consisting of multiple choice questions.	1.5%	Week 06	30 minutes
Outcomes assessed:
Online task	Quiz 6 Quiz consisting of multiple choice questions.	1.5%	Week 07	30 minutes
Outcomes assessed:
Online task	Quiz 7 Quiz consisting of multiple choice questions.	1.5%	Week 08	30 minutes
Outcomes assessed:
Assignment	Assignment 1 Written assignment	35%	Week 08 Due date: 14 Apr 2025 at 23:59	2500 words
Outcomes assessed:
Online task	Quiz 8 Quiz consisting of multiple choice questions.	1.5%	Week 09	30 minutes
Outcomes assessed:
Online task	Quiz 9 Quiz consisting of multiple choice questions.	1.5%	Week 10	30 minutes
Outcomes assessed:
Online task	Quiz 10 Quiz consisting of multiple choice questions.	1.5%	Week 11	30 minutes
Outcomes assessed:
Assignment	Assignment 2 Written assessment	50%	Week 13 Due date: 30 May 2025 at 23:59	4000 words
Outcomes assessed:
= AI allowed ?

Assessment summary

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name	Mark range	Description
High distinction	85 - 100
Distinction	75 - 84
Credit	65 - 74
Pass	50 - 64
Fail	0 - 49	When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see guide to grades.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

Except for supervised exams or in-semester tests, you may use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessments unless expressly prohibited by your unit coordinator.

For exams and in-semester tests, the use of AI and automated writing tools is not allowed unless expressly permitted in the assessment instructions.

The icons in the assessment table above indicate whether AI is allowed – whether full AI, or only some AI (the latter is referred to as “AI restricted”). If no icon is shown, AI use is not permitted at all for the task. Refer to Canvas for full instructions on assessment tasks for this unit.

Your final submission must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of automated writing tools or generative AI, and any material generated that you include in your final submission must be properly referenced. You may be required to submit generative AI inputs and outputs that you used during your assessment process, or drafts of your original work. Inappropriate use of generative AI is considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

The Current Students website provides information on artificial intelligence in assessments. For help on how to correctly acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the  AI in Education Canvas site.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Learning support

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

Weekly schedule

WK	Topic	Learning activity
Week 01	Module 1: Introduction to systematic reviews and meta-analysis	Online class (8 hr)
Week 02	Module 2: Defining the research question and developing a protocol	Online class (8 hr)
Week 03	Module 3: Searching the literature	Online class (8 hr)
Week 04	Module 4: Navigating the screening and selection of studies & data extraction techniques	Online class (8 hr)
Week 05	Module 5: Quality assessment and risk of bias evaluation	Online class (8 hr)
Week 06	Module 6: The what, why, and how of meta-analysis I	Online class (8 hr)
Week 07	Module 7: The what, why, and how of meta-analysis II	Online class (8 hr)
Week 08	Module 8: Unveiling Publication Bias and Embracing PRISMA Reporting Standards	Online class (8 hr)
Week 09	Module 9: GRADE the evidence	Online class (8 hr)
Week 10	Module 10: Critical appraisal of reviews and exploring the future	Online class (8 hr)

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

Outcomes
Graduate qualities

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

LO1. Understand at an introductory level the what, why, and how of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs)
LO2. Understand key elements of other 'types' of reviews (eg systematic reviews of observational studies)
LO3. Formulate answerable healthcare questions and undertake literature searching at an introductory level to locate systematic reviews and RCTs
LO4. Undertake comprehensive literature searching required for a systematic review of RCTs
LO5. Understand at an introductory level the what, why, and how of a meta-analysis of RCTs
LO6. Understand at an introductory level how a meta- analyses of RCTs are conducted and reported
LO7. Appraise the question and validity of a systematic review of RCTs
LO8. Appraise and apply the results of a systematic review of RCTs.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1	Depth of disciplinary expertise Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.
GQ2	Critical thinking and problem solving Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.
GQ3	Oral and written communication Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.
GQ4	Information and digital literacy Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.
GQ5	Inventiveness Generating novel ideas and solutions.
GQ6	Cultural competence Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.
GQ7	Interdisciplinary effectiveness Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.
GQ8	Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.
GQ9	Influence Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes	Graduate qualities
Learning outcomes

Responding to student feedback

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

* Complete revision of learning activities to short, structured, videos * We have introduced new content on: - Systematic reviews of observational studies - Protocol development - Screening and study selection - GRADE approach to rating certainty of evidence

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.

Current students

Overview

Overview

Unit details and rules

Teaching staff

Assessment

Assessment

Assessment summary

Assessment criteria

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

Late submission

Academic integrity

Learning support

Learning support

Simple extensions

Special consideration

Using AI responsibly

Support for students

Weekly schedule

Weekly schedule

Study commitment

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes

Graduate qualities

Outcome map

Responding to student feedback

Responding to student feedback

Disclaimer

On this page

Useful links

CEPI5315: Systematic Reviews

Semester 1, 2025 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

Overview

Overview

Unit details and rules

Teaching staff

Assessment

Assessment

Assessment summary

Assessment criteria

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

Late submission

Academic integrity

Learning support

Learning support

Simple extensions

Special consideration

Using AI responsibly

Support for students

Weekly schedule

Weekly schedule

Study commitment

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes

Graduate qualities

Outcome map

Responding to student feedback

Responding to student feedback

Disclaimer

On this page

Useful links