Unit outline_

CIVL5701: Transport Networks

Semester 2, 2025 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This unit explores the theory and practice of transport network design and analysis, covering both public and private systems. Students progress from foundational concepts to advanced techniques and apply them in a semester-long group project to design a public transport network for a simplified version of Sydney. Weekly topics integrate theory with practical applications. Students will learn the basics of network algorithms and design, and how to apply them to a range of emerging transport challenges.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Civil Engineering
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

CIVL2700 or CIVL9700

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Andres Fielbaum Schnitzler, andres.fielbaum@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 1 September 2025
Type Description Weight Due Length Use of AI
Case studies group assignment Weekly/Fortnightly reports on project "Designing a Tramless Network for Sydney"
Partial guided reports of the advances in the semester-long project
15% Multiple weeks - AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1
In-person written or creative task hurdle task First half exam
Written exam covering weeks 1-5
25% Week 06
Due date: 09 Sep 2025 at 15:00
120 minutes AI prohibited
Outcomes assessed: LO2
In-person written or creative task hurdle task Second half exam
Written exam covering weeks 7-11
25% Week 12
Due date: 28 Oct 2025 at 15:00
120 minutes AI prohibited
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO4
Q&A following presentation, submission or placement Individual Q&A session
Q&A session after the group presentation with individual marks
15% Week 13
Due date: 04 Nov 2025 at 15:00
10 minutes AI prohibited
Outcomes assessed: LO1
Written work group assignment Final report
Final report of the group project
10% Week 13
Due date: 04 Nov 2025 at 23:59
- AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1
Presentation group assignment Final Presentation
Final presentation of the group project
10% Week 13 - AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2
hurdle task = hurdle task ?
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

  • First-half Exam, Week  6, 25% In class

  • Second-half Exam, Week 12, 25% In class

  • Project Design of public transport network: 50%

    • Partial reports 15%,

    • Final presentation 10%, 

    • Final report 10%, 

    • Individual responses 15%.

Partial reports are submitted approximately every two weeks. Each builds cumulatively on the previous one, culminating in a full proposal for a public transport network to serve a simplified representation of Sydney.

The two written exams form a combined hurdle. A minimum average of 45 between the two is required to approve.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

 

The two written exams form a combined hurdle. A minimum average of 45 between the two is required to approve.

For more information see guide to grades.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI)

You can use generative AI tools for open assessments. Restrictions on AI use apply to secure, supervised assessments used to confirm if students have met specific learning outcomes.

Refer to the assessment table above to see if AI is allowed, for assessments in this unit and check Canvas for full instructions on assessment tasks and AI use.

If you use AI, you must always acknowledge it. Misusing AI may lead to a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The University expects students to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

Our website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. This includes advice on how to avoid common breaches of academic integrity. Ensure that you have completed the Academic Honesty Education Module (AHEM) which is mandatory for all commencing coursework students

Penalties for serious breaches can significantly impact your studies and your career after graduation. It is important that you speak with your unit coordinator if you need help with completing assessments.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Motivation, examples, mathematical representation. Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4
Presentation of the course project Project (1 hr) LO1
Week 02 Traditional problems on a given transport network - Dijkstra's algorithm Lecture (2 hr) LO2
Lines structures: Types and proposal Project (1 hr) LO1
Week 03 Evaluation, the ‘illties’ Lecture (2 hr) LO2 LO3
Generalised costs Project (1 hr) LO1
Week 04 Linear and integer optimisation Lecture (2 hr) LO2
Route choice, vehicles' capacity, and frequencies. Project (1 hr) LO1
Week 05 Public transport: Strategic decisions Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO3
Mid-exam preparation Lecture and tutorial (1 hr) LO2
Week 07 Scale, scope economies, and network effects in public transport networks Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Finding a demand-supply-equilibrium frequencies Project (1 hr) LO1
Week 08 Supply-demand equilibrium in public transport Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4
Mid-term project presentations Project (1 hr) LO1
Week 09 Private networks: Externalities, mode choice, and paradoxes Lecture (2 hr) LO3 LO4
Operational costs, total budget, and users costs Project (1 hr) LO1
Week 10 Dynamic transport networks Lecture (2 hr) LO2 LO4
Redesign of the network Project (1 hr) LO1
Week 11 Cyclepaths and bikesharing Lecture (2 hr) LO2 LO4
Second half exam preparation Lecture and tutorial (1 hr) LO3 LO4
Week 13 Final presentations of the course project Presentation (3 hr) LO1

Attendance and class requirements

Weekly in-person (online) attendance is expected as per University requirements. There will be in-class activities and presentations critical to learning.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. develop a public transport network plan, share with class
  • LO2. use a transport network model: understand the representation of transport problems as combinatorial problems on networks; understand the algorithmic reasoning to solve problems on networks; understand other techniques to solve the problems
  • LO3. understand the main differences between public and private transport networks: draw implications of the externalities characterising each of them; practice the methods of network analysis.
  • LO4. analyse the implications of demand-responsive networks: compare global optimisation vs users’ equilibrium; practice different policies to align individual and societal objectives; discuss equity and implementability issues.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

More examples will be added to the first part of the class, that was deemed as too abstract in the previous delivery of this unit.

COMPLEMENTARY READINGS

 

  1. Santi, P., Resta, G., Szell, M., Sobolevsky, S., Strogatz, S. H., & Ratti, C. (2014). Quantifying the benefits of vehicle pooling with shareability networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(37), 13290-13294. (Week 1)

  2. Porta, S., Crucitti, P., & Latora, V. (2006). The network analysis of urban streets: A dual approach. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 369(2), 853-866. (Week 1).

  3. Network Optimization: Continuous and Discrete Models, Dimitri Bertsekas, Chapter 2. (Week 2)

  4. Farahani, R. Z., Miandoabchi, E., Szeto, W. Y., & Rashidi, H. (2013). A review of urban transportation network design problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(2), 281-302. (Week 3)

  5. Wu, H., & Levinson, D. (2020). Unifying access. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 83, 102355. (Week 3)

  6. Borndörfer, R., Grötschel, M., & Pfetsch, M. E. (2007). A column-generation approach to line planning in public transport. Transportation Science, 41(1), 123-132. (Week 4, week 7).

  7. Mauttone, A., Cancela, H., & Urquhart, M. E. (2021). Public Transportation. Network Design with Applications to Transportation and Logistics, 539-565. (Weeks 4, 5, 7)

  8. Mikishanina, E. (2023). Nonlinear Optimization Logistic Model in the Problem of Cargo Transportation. Transportation Research Procedia, 68, 133-137. (Week 6)

  9. Jara-Díaz, S., Fielbaum, A., & Gschwender, A. (2017). Optimal fleet size, frequencies and vehicle capacities considering peak and off-peak periods in public transport. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 106, 65-74. (Weeks 6,9).

  10. Walker, J., (2012). Human transit: How clearer thinking about public transit can enrich our communities and our lives. Island Press. (Weeks 7-9).

  11. Levinson, D. (2022). Sydney FAST 2030: A Proposal for Faster Accessible Surface Transport (FAST).

  12. Durán-Micco, J., & Vansteenwegen, P. (2022). A survey on the transit network design and frequency setting problem. Public Transport, 14(1), 155-190. (Week 8)

  13. Fielbaum, A., Jara-Diaz, S., & Gschwender, A. (2020). Beyond the Mohring effect: Scale economies induced by transit lines structures design. Economics of Transportation, 22, 100163. (Week 9)

  14. Wu, H., & Levinson, D. (2021). Optimum stop spacing for accessibility. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 21(2), 1-18.

  15. Hymel, K. M., Small, K. A., & Van Dender, K. (2010). Induced demand and rebound effects in road transport. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 44(10), 1220-1241. (Week 10)

  16. Mogridge, M. J. H., Holden, D. J., Bird, J., & Terzis, G. C. (1987). The Downs/Thomson paradox and the transportation planning process. International Journal of Transport Economics/Rivista internazionale di economia dei trasporti, 283-311. (Week 10)

  17. Roughgarden, T. (2007). Routing games. Algorithmic game theory, 18, 459-484. (Week 10)

  18. Basso, L. J., & Jara-Díaz, S. R. (2012). Integrating congestion pricing, transit subsidies and mode choice. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(6), 890-900. (Week 10)

  19. Frade, I., & Ribeiro, A. (2015). Bike-sharing stations: A maximal covering location approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 82, 216-227. (Week 11)

  20. Mauttone, A., Mercadante, G., Rabaza, M., & Toledo, F. (2017). Bicycle network design: model and solution algorithm. Transportation Research Procedia, 27, 969-976. (Week 11)

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.