Unit outline_

EDHP2008: Sports Science in HPE 2

Semester 2, 2025 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

The unit is designed to provide the skills, knowledge and understanding necessary for effective construction and implementation of training programs for health benefits and to improve performance. The unit develops students' understanding of the different training strategies and the principles of training that shape these strategies. The unit also develops knowledge of the psychological factors that are important in helping the general population and athletes adhere to training and exercise programs. In taking this focus, the unit builds students' knowledge and understanding of the Stage 6 PDHPE syllabus.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Education
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
EDHP1013 or EDHP2005
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

Students will have completed EDHP1013 and have a knowledge and understanding of how body systems are impacted by and/or contribute to movement and the biomechanical principles of movement

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Louisa Peralta, louisa.peralta@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 1 September 2025
Type Description Weight Due Length Use of AI
Presentation group assignment ICT teaching resource presentation
Presentation
15% Multiple weeks 500 word equivalent AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO6
Written work group assignment ICT Teaching Resources
ICT Resource
15% Multiple weeks 1000 word equivalent AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO5 LO6
Out-of-class quiz Early Feedback Task Multiple Choice Quiz
Multiple Choice Quiz #earlyfeedbacktask
0% Week 03
Due date: 24 Aug 2025 at 23:59
20 minutes AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO3
Debate group assignment Debate
Debate
30% Week 05
Due date: 01 Sep 2025 at 09:00
1000-word equivalent AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO5
Case studies Case Study
Case Study
40% Week 13
Due date: 09 Nov 2025 at 23:59
2000 words AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3
group assignment = group assignment ?
early feedback task = early feedback task ?

Early feedback task

This unit includes an early feedback task, designed to give you feedback prior to the census date for this unit. Details are provided in the Canvas site and your result will be recorded in your Marks page. It is important that you actively engage with this task so that the University can support you to be successful in this unit.

Assessment summary

Assessment: Early Feedback Quiz

Students will complete a multiple choice quiz on the first 3 weeks of content.

Assessment task: Debate  

As a PDHPE teacher, you will be expected to have opinions on controversial topics and to be able to back your opinions with scientific evidence and reason. As a way of developing these skills you will participate in a debate as part of your assessment. 

Students will be allocated to a topic and to either the affirmative or negative side. There will be three students per side (6 students per topic). Each team member will speak for 3 minutes on their topic. 

Where possible, all speakers should try to provide supporting evidence from the scientific literature for their arguments. 

At the completion of each team's arguments, both teams will be given time to prepare and ask the opposition 2 questions. The responding team will have 1 - 2 minutes to answer each question. These questions should probe the opposition's arguments in an attempt to rebut their position.  

To accompany the debate: 

  • Each team must upload a summary paper (500 words) that outlines their arguments (with supporting references and examples) by 8am of the day of the debate i.e. one summary per team). 

  • Students must then upload an individual 500 word reflection that reflects on the overall value of debates as a learning tool as well as their experiences within the debate. This should be uploaded one week after the debate.  

Assessment task: ICT Teaching and Learning Resource and Presentation  

This task is in two parts: 

Part A – ICT based teaching and learning resource (15%) (50 min lesson)

Students are required to develop an informative, engaging and student centred teaching and learning activities for an allocated area of the stage 6 Health and Movement Science syllabus. In developing the activities, the student must embed an original and creative use of ICT within the 50 mins of learning.

The teaching and learning activities MUST be original, but the use of other resources is permitted. Please ensure that external resources are referenced as per APA guidelines.  

Part B - Teaching Presentation (25 minutes) (15%) 

Students will select a couple of the teaching and learning activities and deliver these to their peers in a micro-teaching session. Within this micro-teaching students must select 2 of the following teaching/learning episodes:

1. opening whole group activity with the aim of knowledge development 

2. transition into a student centred activity with sufficient challenge for diverse learners where students are applying knowledge 

3. concluding activity where the teachers are using formative assessment to gather (and act on) evidence of learning.

Assessment: Case Study Development and Answers 

Part A: Case Study & Questions (700 - 800 words) 

In the stage 6 syllabus one of the suggested teaching strategies involves students examining two athlete case studies to analyse differing training methods. This task is designed to develop your ability to write authentic case studies whilst at the same time allowing you to demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of the content addressed across the unit. 

In this task, you will develop a case study of an athlete detailing a range of issues relating to the athlete. The case study should detail background information about the athlete such as their sport/event, level of competition, current training program, goals etc. The case study should then highlight at least two concerns the athlete is facing. These concerns could include anxiety, motivation, training factors such as overtraining or recovery, physiological adaptations, measurement and evaluation of fitness, supplement use etc. 

The case study should be well developed and authentic for an already ELITE athlete.

From the case study you should then develop three questions relating to the athlete. These questions would be questions the athlete could ask an expert in order to improve their performance. The questions should be logical extensions from the case study detail and must address at 3 different areas of the unit content. 

The content areas are as follows: 
• Training factors (types of training, principles of training, overtraining) 
• Planning of training 
• Physiological adaptations 
• Recovery principles 
• Psychological asepcts (motivation, anxiety and arousal) 
• Ergogenic aids 

Part B: Evidence Based Responses (1400 - 1600 words) 

You will also have to provide your answers to the questions using literature to support your responses. In providing these evidence based responses you will be required to demonstrate your depth of knowledge and understanding of the unit content. 

Full task instructions, criteria and rubrics are available on canvas.

 

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

 

For more information see guide to grades.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI)

You can use generative AI tools for open assessments. Restrictions on AI use apply to secure, supervised assessments used to confirm if students have met specific learning outcomes.

Refer to the assessment table above to see if AI is allowed, for assessments in this unit and check Canvas for full instructions on assessment tasks and AI use.

If you use AI, you must always acknowledge it. Misusing AI may lead to a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

As per policy

Academic integrity

The University expects students to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

Our website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. This includes advice on how to avoid common breaches of academic integrity. Ensure that you have completed the Academic Honesty Education Module (AHEM) which is mandatory for all commencing coursework students

Penalties for serious breaches can significantly impact your studies and your career after graduation. It is important that you speak with your unit coordinator if you need help with completing assessments.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction to the unit: aims, content and assessments Re-visiting Sports Science for HPE1 – establishing prior knowledge and introducing the Principles of Training Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 02 Types of training and training methods : anaerobic – strength, speed and power; aerobic and flexibility and the FITT principle. Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 03 Energy Systems and Training : training adaptations (physiological responses) and specificity, nutrition and energy systems and Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 04 Practice Debates : preparing for assessment #1 Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO4 LO5
Week 05 Planning the training schedule/session: periodisation, tapering and peaking Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 06 Debates: the debates assessment will be run during the 3 hour session (schedule to be confirmed via canvas) Presentation (3 hr) LO4 LO5
Week 07 Training and recovery strategies, including injury prevention and management Assessment #2 Presentations Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO5 LO6
Week 08 Psychological Aspects of Performance and Movement: skill acquisition and performance Assessment #2 Presentations Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO5 LO6
Week 09 Psychological Aspects of Performance and Movement: motivation, anxiety, arousal, self efficacy etc Assessment #2 Presentations Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO5 LO6
Week 10 Performance and Ergogenic Aids: ethical issues in sport – contemporary and historical aspects Assessment #2 Presentations Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 11 Sports Injury: major injury types, recovery and rehabilitation – case studies Assessment #2 Presentations Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO5 LO6
Week 12 Applying content knowledge to the new Health and Movement Science Stage 6 syllabus. Assessment #2 Presentations Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Afremow, J. (2014). The champion’s mind: How great athletes think, train and thrive. Emmaus, Penn: Rodale Books. 

Baechle, T. R., & Earle, R. W. (2008). Essentials of strength training and conditioning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. 

Bell, L., & Ingle, L. (2013). Psycho-physiological markers of overreaching and overtraining in endurance sports: A review of the evidence. Medicina Sportiva, 17, (2), 81 – 94. 

Booth, M., & Orr, R. (2016). Effects of plyometric training on sports performance. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 38(1), 30-37. 

Brukner, P. D., & Khan, K. (2012). Brukner and Khan’s Clinical Sports Medicine (4th ed.). Sydney: McGraw Hill. 

Buchanan, D., O' Connor, D., McLean, J., & Ingram, K. (2009). Peak Performance 2. South Yarra, Vic: Macmillan. 

Buchanan, D., O' Connor, D., McLean, J., & Ingram, K. (2010). Peak Performance 1. South Yarra, Vic: Macmillan. 

Bundy, M., & Leaver, A. (2010). A guide to sports and injury management. Edinburgh: Churchill, Livingstone.  

Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books. 

Hanrahan, S. J. A. M. B. (2010). Routledge Handbook of Applied Sport Psychology. Florence: Taylor and Francis.  

Joyce, D., Lewindon, D., & ProQuest (Firm). (2014). High-performance training for sports. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. 

Karp, J. R. (2012). Recovery. Modern Athlete & Coach, 50(2), 19-21.  

Kremer, J. (2012). Key concepts in sport psychology. London: SAGE. 

Kenney, W. L., Wilmore, J., & Costill, D. (2011). Physiology of Sport and Exercise. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. 

Maughan, R.J. (2014) Sports nutrition. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell. 

McMorris, T. (2014). Acquisition and performance of sports skills (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley 

Porcari, J., Brant, C., & Comana, F. (2015). Exercise Physiology. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company. 

Powers, Scott K. et al. (2014) Exercise physiology: Australia & New Zealand. North Ryde, NSW: McGraw-Hill Education Australia Pty Ltd. 

Robson-Ansley, P. J., Gleeson, M., & Ansley, L. (2009). Fatigue management in the preparation of olympic athletes. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27(13), 1409-1420.  

Schwellnus, M. (2008). The Olympic textbook of medicine in sport. Oxford, UK; Wiley-Blackwell. 

Thorpe, R. T., Atkinson, G., Drust, B., & Gregson, W. (2017). Monitoring Fatigue Status in Elite Team-Sport Athletes: Implications for Practice. International Journal Of Sports Physiology & Performance, 12S2-27-S2-34. 

Wolinsky, I., & Driskell, J. (2004). Nutritional ergogenic aids. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 

Weinberg, R., & Gould, D. (2010). Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Critically evaluate the theories and principles that underlie practices that are designed to improve performance or achieve health benefits for a variety of participants
  • LO2. Apply research based knowledge to design and evaluate training programs for specific outcomes and specific populations
  • LO3. Understand the safety and ethical requirements for sport, training and learning
  • LO4. Articulate, justify and defend their position on a controversial topic supported by research evidence.
  • LO5. Work collaboratively and co-operatively in a team to achieve a common goal
  • LO6. Design creative, challenging and student centred learning and teaching activities that effectively embed ICT to promote student learning

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Feedback on the unit is welcomed. This unit has been run once and feedback generally reported favourably on the learning and assessemnts.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.