Unit outline_

ENGG1810: Introduction to Engineering Computing

Semester 2, 2025 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This unit introduces students to computational thinking and programming skills essential for solving a variety of engineering problems. Students will explore how complex engineering applications can be modelled and analysed using computational tools, including data processing, time-series analysis, and data visualisation. The unit covers fundamental programming concepts such as variables, functions, data structures, algorithms, and core coding skills. Students will learn to transform real-world engineering challenges into computational tasks, develop efficient programs to solve these tasks, and evaluate the effectiveness of their solutions through visualised results. Through a combination of individual and group projects, students will also learn to access, analyse, evaluate and visualise climate and air pollution data from across Australia to inform engineering decisions.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Engineering
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
ENGG1801 or INFO1110 or INFO1910 or INFO1103 or INFO1903 or INFO1105 or INFO1905 or COSC1003
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Rex di Bona, rex.dibona@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 1 September 2025
Type Description Weight Due Length Use of AI
Written exam
? 
hurdle task
Final Exam
Closed Book Supervised Exam
50% Formal exam period 2 hours AI prohibited
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Out-of-class quiz Early Feedback Task Early Feedback Quiz
Questions to check mastery of concepts. #earlyfeedbacktask
2% Week 03
Due date: 22 Aug 2025 at 23:59
30 minutes AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2
Experimental design Project 1
Solve a data visualisation and processing problem and write a report based on project description
8% Week 07
Due date: 19 Sep 2025 at 23:59
5 weeks AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3
Experimental design group assignment Project 2
Two-part assignment due in weeks 9 (Group) & 13 (Individual). Solve a computational engineering problem and write a report based on project description
25% Week 11
Due date: 03 Nov 2025 at 23:59
6 weeks AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
In-person written or creative task group assignment Hackathon
In-class hackathon to assess problem solving, group work, and learning
5% Week 12
Due date: 27 Oct 2025 at 16:00
N/A AI prohibited
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
In-class quiz Weekly Exercises and Coding Practice
Questions to check mastery of contents in Weeks 2-13
10% Weekly 10-minute quizzes in class and tutorials AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
hurdle task = hurdle task ?
group assignment = group assignment ?
early feedback task = early feedback task ?

Early feedback task

This unit includes an early feedback task, designed to give you feedback prior to the census date for this unit. Details are provided in the Canvas site and your result will be recorded in your Marks page. It is important that you actively engage with this task so that the University can support you to be successful in this unit.

Assessment summary

Weekly Exercises and Coding Practice - 10%: All weekly exercises and coding practice must be completed individually. The problems and practice will assess your understanding of the contents covered each week. You need to submit them before due date. These are in class and in tutorial quizzes.

Early Feedback Quiz - 2%: This will be an online quiz taking place during week 3. The quiz will cover content related concepts from Lectures 1-3, and the outcome will provide feedback on how you have mastered these concepts. The quiz is designed to assess student engagement with the unit.

Project 1 - 8%: This will be an individual project to solve a data visualisation and processing problem and write a report based on the project description

Project 2 - 25%: This will be a group and individual project. It is a two-part assignment with a group section and an individual section. Solve a computational engineering problem and write a report based on project description

Hackathon - 5%: This will be a group activity in Week 12.

Final exam - 50%: Covers all aspects of the course. This is a closed book examination. You are not allowed to access recources etc.

To pass this unit, a student must achieve at least 40% in the written examination, and also achieve an overall final mark of 50 or more. Any student not meeting these requirements may be given a maximum final mark of no more than 45 regardless of their average.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

For more information see guide to grades.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI)

You can use generative AI tools for open assessments. Restrictions on AI use apply to secure, supervised assessments used to confirm if students have met specific learning outcomes.

Refer to the assessment table above to see if AI is allowed, for assessments in this unit and check Canvas for full instructions on assessment tasks and AI use.

If you use AI, you must always acknowledge it. Misusing AI may lead to a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The University expects students to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

Our website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. This includes advice on how to avoid common breaches of academic integrity. Ensure that you have completed the Academic Honesty Education Module (AHEM) which is mandatory for all commencing coursework students

Penalties for serious breaches can significantly impact your studies and your career after graduation. It is important that you speak with your unit coordinator if you need help with completing assessments.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction Lecture (2 hr) LO1
Tutorial Tutorial (2 hr) LO1
Week 02 Introduction to Python I - data types & I/O Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Tutorial Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 03 Introduction to Python II - functions & control Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Tutorial Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 04 Introduction to Python III - arrays & plotting Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Tutorial Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 05 Introduction to Python IV - debugging Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Tutorial Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 06 Introduction to Python V - engineering datasets & Pandas library Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Tutorial Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 07 Designing a program from scratch & understanding programming architecture Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Tutorial Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 08 Engineering data and processes & time series Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Tutorial Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 09 Applied optimisation Lecture (2 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Tutorial Tutorial (2 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 10 Project 2 video presentations Lecture (2 hr) LO5
Tutorial - project 2 video presentations Tutorial (2 hr) LO5
Week 11 Classes and modules Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Tutorial Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Week 12 Hackathon Lecture (2 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Hackathon Tutorial (2 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 13 Revision and discussing exam Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Tutorial Tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Weekly 6 hours of independent study each week for reviewing course material, independent research, and practicing programming skills. Independent study (78 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

Attendance and class requirements

Course websites:

The course website on Canvas will contain information, including important announcements. Teaching staff will communicate with all students via Canvas which is considered part of the course. Students are expected to regularly visit Canvas to know these announcements and information concerning the format and schedule of assessment. Learning materials and assessments will also be stored at the course site on edstem.org/. 

Attendance

Students are recommended to attend the weekly lectures and/or watch lecture recordings after the class. Students are recommended to attend their tutorial class each week for learning, support, and feedback. Students who are unable to attend a lecture or tutorial class will be responsible for catching up on the contents covered before the next class. 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All readings for this unit can be accessed through the Library.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Understanding computational problems and programming in an engineering context
  • LO2. Apply core Python constructs (data types, control flow, functions, arrays) to design programs that solve defined problems
  • LO3. Develop programs that process and visualise engineering data
  • LO4. Implement basic optimisation and decision-making algorithms to support engineering judgements
  • LO5. Critically evaluate engineering problems in terms of computational procedures, limitations and implications for engineering practice

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

Alignment with Competency standards

Outcomes Competency standards
LO1
Engineers Australia Curriculum Performance Indicators - EAPI
2. IN-DEPTH TECHNICAL COMPETENCE
2.1. Appropriate range and depth of learning in the technical domains comprising the field of practice informed by national and international benchmarks.
2.2. Application of enabling skills and knowledge to problem solution in these technical domains.
2.3. Meaningful engagement with current technical and professional practices and issues in the designated field.
2.4. Advanced knowledge and capability development in one or more specialist areas through engagement with: (a) specific body of knowledge and emerging developments and (b) problems and situations of significant technical complexity.
LO2
Engineers Australia Curriculum Performance Indicators - EAPI
2. IN-DEPTH TECHNICAL COMPETENCE
2.1. Appropriate range and depth of learning in the technical domains comprising the field of practice informed by national and international benchmarks.
2.2. Application of enabling skills and knowledge to problem solution in these technical domains.
2.4. Advanced knowledge and capability development in one or more specialist areas through engagement with: (a) specific body of knowledge and emerging developments and (b) problems and situations of significant technical complexity.
5. PRACTICAL AND ‘HANDS-ON’ EXPERIENCE
LO3
Engineers Australia Curriculum Performance Indicators - EAPI
1. ENABLING SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT
1.1. Developing underpinning capabilities in mathematics, physical, life and information sciences and engineering sciences, as appropriate to the designated field of practice.
2. IN-DEPTH TECHNICAL COMPETENCE
2.1. Appropriate range and depth of learning in the technical domains comprising the field of practice informed by national and international benchmarks.
2.2. Application of enabling skills and knowledge to problem solution in these technical domains.
2.4. Advanced knowledge and capability development in one or more specialist areas through engagement with: (a) specific body of knowledge and emerging developments and (b) problems and situations of significant technical complexity.
4.2. Ability to use a systems approach to complex problems, and to design and operational performance.
LO4
Engineers Australia Curriculum Performance Indicators - EAPI
2. IN-DEPTH TECHNICAL COMPETENCE
2.2. Application of enabling skills and knowledge to problem solution in these technical domains.
LO5
Engineers Australia Curriculum Performance Indicators - EAPI
2. IN-DEPTH TECHNICAL COMPETENCE
2.1. Appropriate range and depth of learning in the technical domains comprising the field of practice informed by national and international benchmarks.
2.2. Application of enabling skills and knowledge to problem solution in these technical domains.
2.4. Advanced knowledge and capability development in one or more specialist areas through engagement with: (a) specific body of knowledge and emerging developments and (b) problems and situations of significant technical complexity.
Engineers Australia Curriculum Performance Indicators -
Competency code Taught, Practiced or Assessed Competency standard
1.1 T Developing underpinning capabilities in mathematics, physical, life and information sciences and engineering sciences, as appropriate to the designated field of practice.
1.2 T Tackling technically challenging problems from first principles.
2.1 T Appropriate range and depth of learning in the technical domains comprising the field of practice informed by national and international benchmarks.
2.2 T Application of enabling skills and knowledge to problem solution in these technical domains.
2.3 P Meaningful engagement with current technical and professional practices and issues in the designated field.
2.4 T Advanced knowledge and capability development in one or more specialist areas through engagement with: (a) specific body of knowledge and emerging developments and (b) problems and situations of significant technical complexity.
4.2 T Ability to use a systems approach to complex problems, and to design and operational performance.
5.1 T An appreciation of the scientific method, the need for rigour and a sound theoretical basis.
5.5 P T Skills in the development and application of mathematical, physical and conceptual models, understanding of applicability and shortcomings.
5.6 P Skills in the design and conduct of experiments and measurements.

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This will be a new launch of a refreshed curriculum in 2025.

Every week students must:

  • Attend and take notes for the Live lecture (Mondays) or watch and take notes for the Recorded lecture 
  • Prepare for the Tutorial by reviewing reading, lecture and lab questions 
  • Attend and participate in weekly Tutorial with tutor (as timetabled)

 

Computer programming assignments may be checked by specialist code similarity detection software. The Faculty of Engineering currently uses the MOSS similarity detection engine (see http://theory.stanford.edu/~aiken/moss/), or the similarity report available in ED (edstem.org). These programs work in a similar way to Turnitin in that they check for similarity against a database of previously submitted assignments and code available on the internet, but they have added functionality to detect cases of similarity of holistic code structure in cases such as global search and replace of variable names, reordering of lines, changing of comment lines, and the use of white space.

All written assignments submitted in this unit of study will be submitted to the similarity detecting software program known as Turnitin. Turnitin searches for matches between text in your written assessment task and text sourced from the Internet, published works and assignments that have previously been submitted to Turnitin for analysis.

There will always be some degree of text-matching when using Turnitin. Text-matching may occur in use of direct quotations, technical terms and phrases, or the listing of bibliographic material. This does not mean you will automatically be accused of academic dishonesty or plagiarism, although Turnitin reports may be used as evidence in academic dishonesty and plagiarism decision-making processes.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.