Unit outline_

LAWS5230: International Law: Conflict and Gender

Semester 2, 2026 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This unit will develop students’ knowledge of International Law’s rules and institutions as they apply to conflict. It draws on contemporary jurisprudence and state practice from international humanitarian law, international criminal law, international human rights law, and the use of force. Students will learn how to apply critical theoretical perspectives to international law, drawing particularly on diverse feminist approaches (including intersectional, Indigenous and Global South feminist theories). Students will be encouraged to understand ‘gender’ beyond a binary approach, and to explore how a gendered lens can serve as a means of highlighting blind spots and limitations in international law. In terms of skills development., this unit will teach students how to apply black letter law and legal theory to fictional and real-life problem scenarios. The unit will also introduce students to the concept of feminist judgment writing, giving students a valuable insight into the practice of analysing facts and writing judgments. The module’s mixed assessment methods are designed to encourage the development of students’ oral and written communication skills, and there is a strong emphasis on student participation throughout. This unit will include some discussion of sensitive material, including sexual and gender-based violence, atrocity crimes, and crimes perpetrated against Indigenous peoples.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
LAWS5005
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
LAWS3530 or LAWS6366
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Rosemary Grey, rosemary.grey@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Rosemary Grey, rosemary.grey@sydney.edu.au
Rachel Killean, rachel.killean@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 31 August 2026
Type Description Weight Due Length Use of AI
Written work Feminist judgment (50%)
Written essay
50% Formal exam period
Due date: 16 Nov 2026 at 23:59

Closing date: 30 Nov 2026
2000 words AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Contribution Class participation (20%)
Structured class participation – on call with targeted questions.
20% Ongoing 15 mins over the course of the unit AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2
Out-of-class quiz Early Feedback Task Early Feedback Task (0%)
Online quiz
0% Week 03
Due date: 20 Aug 2026 at 23:59
Multiple-choice questions AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1
In-person written or creative task In-class test (20%)
Multiple-choice questions
20% Week 05
Due date: 03 Sep 2026 at 08:15
45 minutes AI prohibited
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2
Written work Judgment Plan (with oral component) (10%)
Essay plan and discussion in class
10% Week 12
Due date: 28 Oct 2026 at 23:59

Closing date: 05 Nov 2026
500 words AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3
early feedback task = early feedback task ?

Assessment summary

Early feedback task (0%): As part of our commitment to student success, this unit includes a required Early Feedback task. This task has no impact on students’ grades but is designed to provide students with timely insights into their understanding and engagement with the unit content. The task is an online multiple-choice quiz assessing material covered to the end of week 2. The task will be available from 9am on 3 August 2026 and must be completed by 11:59pm on 20 August 2026 (Sydney, Australia time).

Class participation (20%) : Students will be assigned two specific readings from the reading list for the unit and will be expected to be able to explain the reading in a small group setting and/or to the class as a whole. Students will be expected to be able to answer discussion questions from the teacher and additional follow-up questions from teachers and classmates on the content of the reading.

While participation marks are primarily given on the basis of your understanding of your assigned reading, general participation is considered and can enhance your final mark. For example, we will consider whether you are asking questions of and engaging with other students’ accounts of their own assigned reading. Therefore, it is important to engage with all your assigned readings. A Class Participation Rubric will be made available on Canvas so that you can see how this will be assessed.

In-class test (20%): Students will complete 45 minutes in-class test on Thursday 3 September 2026 during class time (Sydney, Australia Time) consisting of multiple-choice questions. This assessment evaluates students’ ability to recall and apply ICL concepts and principles. Instructions and details will be provided on the unit Canvas site prior to the assessment. The test supports the development of analytical reasoning and legal problem-solving skills, as described in the unit’s learning outcomes. 

Feminist judgment plan (with oral component) (10%):  Students will be required to submit a plan (500 words) excluding citations (note: footnotes containing citations do not count toward the word count, but discursive footnote containing additional information do)".  The plan must be submitted by 11.59pm (Sydney, Australia time) on 28 October 2026 (before the final day of class). Students should come to class ready to discuss their plan. A Plan and Oral Component Rubric will be uploaded to Canvas.

Feminist judgment (50%): Students will select one of the provided ‘real world’ international law decisions, then rewrite it from a feminist perspective. The Feminist Judgment outline, will be released at 9:00am (Sydney, Australia time) on 3 August 2026. The total word limit for this assessment (i.e. rewritten judgement and commentary) is 2000 words (excluding references and headings). No bibliography is required. In general, you should devote more words to the judgment than to the commentary. You are not expected to match the length of the judgment you are rewriting, and you will not be marked down for lacking the depth of a much longer piece of writing! See the Rubric on Canvas for more details regarding how this will be marked. This assessment uses the ‘feminist judgment method’. The Feminist Judgment must be submitted via Canvas no later than 11:59pm (Sydney, Australia time) on Monday 16 November 2026.

Word limit penalty: A piece of assessment which exceeds the prescribed word limit will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment for every 100 words, or part thereof. The total word count for all written assessments excludes footnote references, and acknowledgements of permissible assistance from editors, automated writing tools or generative AI.  ‘Discursive footnotes’, i.e. footnotes containing text other than citations, do form part of the word limit.

Use of editors or proof-readers: In completing unsupervised assessments, students may use editors, proof-readers, and automated writing tools (including translation software, grammar checkers, reference generators and artificial intelligence), provided that all use is acknowledged and consistent with University policies and procedures including Academic Integrity Policy. Acknowledgment must be made in writing on the front of the work submitted for assessment, or in an appropriate footnote or other reference, and state the name of the person or software. 

You are permitted to use generative AI for this assignment, but you must not submit AI-generated text or images as your own work. You may use AI, for example, to brainstorm ideas, and to assist with editing your own writing. You must include a declaration that explains, in detail, how you used AI.

Special consideration: Successful grants of Special Consideration may involve alternative tasks such as a viva (oral examination), designed to fulfill the learning outcomes of the original task. 

Assessment requirements to pass a unit of study: A student must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks set out in this Unit of Study in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of Study. As the EFT is an early diagnostic tool, this task is not included in the final grade for the unit.  

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2021 (Schedule 1). 

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard. 

Result name 

Mark range 

Description 

High distinction 

85 - 100 

• Completely answers the question. 
• Contains striking originality of approach or analysis. 
• Demonstrates exhaustive or innovative research (where independent research 
required). 
• Exceptionally well written, structured and expressed. 
• Is otherwise exceptional in some way. 

Distinction 

75 - 84 

• Completely answers the question. 
• Achieves a critical and evaluative approach to the issues. 
• Content and structure is well organised in support of the argument. 
• Demonstrates extensive research and analysis to support a well-documented 
argument. 
• Generally well expressed and free from errors. 
• Has a clear structure and is well articulated. 

Credit 

65 - 74 

• Covers main issues fairly well in answering the question. 
• Contains no significant errors 
• Demonstrates an attempted critical approach to the issues. 
• Demonstrates reasonably sound research and analysis in addressing the key issues. 
• Has a clear structure and reasonably clear expression. 

Pass 

50 - 64 

• Identifies the key issues, but does not follow through with a reasoned argument. 
• Contains some significant errors. 
• Displays satisfactory engagement with the key issues. 
• Offers descriptive summary of material relevant to the question. 
• Superficial use of material, and may display a tendency to paraphrase. 
• Demonstrates little evidence of in-depth research or analysis. 
• Adequate expression. 
• Overall, demonstrates the minimum level of competence in the assessment and 
satisfies the requirements to proceed to higher-level studies in the degree or subject 
area. 

Fail 

0 - 49 

• Does not answer the question. 
• Contains significant or numerous errors. 
• Few or no identifiable arguments. 
• Content that is inappropriate or irrelevant. 
• Lack of research or analysis. 
• Difficult or impossible to understand through poor grammar, expression or 
structure. 
• Overall, does not demonstrate the minimum level of competence in the 
assessment. 

For more information see Guide to Grades. 

For more information see guide to grades.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI)

You can use generative AI tools for open assessments. Restrictions on AI use apply to secure, supervised assessments used to confirm if students have met specific learning outcomes.

Refer to the assessment table above to see if AI is allowed, for assessments in this unit and check Canvas for full instructions on assessment tasks and AI use.

If you use AI, you must always acknowledge it. Misusing AI may lead to a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The late submission of a piece of assessment, without an approved extension, will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment per 24 hours or part thereof, after the due time on the due date. Penalties for late submission will be applied strictly, subject to a 5 minute grace period. Late penalties do not apply to tests.

Academic integrity

The University expects students to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

Our website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. This includes advice on how to avoid common breaches of academic integrity. Ensure that you have completed the Academic Honesty Education Module (AHEM) which is mandatory for all commencing coursework students

Penalties for serious breaches can significantly impact your studies and your career after graduation. It is important that you speak with your unit coordinator if you need help with completing assessments.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 1. Foundations of International Law and Gender Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 02 2. Writing Feminist Judgments Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 03 3. Use of Force Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 04 4. The Laws of Armed Conflict Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 05 5. Genocide Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 07 6. Settler Colonialism and Genocide Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5
Week 08 7. Enslavement in Conflict Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 10 8. Gender and Persecution Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 11 9. Environmental Crime Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 12 10. Alternative Futures and Completion of the student feedback survey for this unit of study. Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: All students are required to attend 70%  of classes  to satisfy the pass requirements for this unit. Failure to meet this requirement will result in an Absent Fail grade being recorded as the student’s result for this unit (see The University of Sydney Law School Resolutions: Coursework Awards cl 11).  

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

There is no core textbook required for this Unit. 

All required readings for this unit can be accessed through the Canvas site under ‘Reading List’.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. identify and explain sources of international law, including international humanitarian law, international criminal law, international human rights law, and the regulation of the use of force, as applied in times of war and peace.
  • LO2. identify, describe and evaluate feminist theories and related critical theoretical perspectives.
  • LO3. critically analyze sources of international law using multiple critical legal theories, to create oral and written arguments.
  • LO4. critically evaluate and analyze fictional and real-life problem scenarios using diverse legal frameworks and theories.
  • LO5. demonstrate oral and written legal communication skills by writing a feminist judgment

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This is a brand-new unit, and taught for the first time.

Disclaimer

Important: the University of Sydney regularly reviews units of study and reserves the right to change the units of study available annually. To stay up to date on available study options, including unit of study details and availability, refer to the relevant handbook.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.