Outline

Overview

This unit provides an examination of research methods in the context of criminology. The relationship between theory and methodology is explored. The production of knowledge about crime is critically assessed. Sources and forms of crime data are discussed and their significance is assessed. Research design, evaluation and analysis are also studied. This is a core unit for students enrolled in the Master of Criminology. Refer to the Sydney Law School timetable - https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/4533/pages/postgraduate-lecture-timetable

Unit details and rules

Academic unit	Law
Credit points	6
Prerequisites ?	None
Corequisites ?	None
Prohibitions ?	None
Assumed knowledge ?	None
Available to study abroad and exchange students	No

Teaching staff

Coordinator	Tyrone Kirchengast, tyrone.kirchengast@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s)	Tyrone Kirchengast, tyrone.kirchengast@sydney.edu.au

Assessment

The census date for this unit availability is 5 September 2025

Details
Criteria

Type	Description	Weight	Due	Length	Use of AI
Written work	Review of research scholarship (40%) Written task	40%	Week 04 Due date: 15 Sep 2025 at 17:00 Closing date: 15 Oct 2025	2000 words/6 weeks	AI allowed
Outcomes assessed:
Written work	Research proposal (60%) Written task	60%	Week 08 Due date: 13 Oct 2025 at 17:00 Closing date: 13 Nov 2025	5000 words/4 weeks	AI allowed
Outcomes assessed:

Assessment summary

Review of Research Scholarship (40%):

Students will write a 2000-word (excluding footnotes and bibliography) review of an article selected from a list made available via Canvas. The Release date will be at 5:00pm on 15 August 2025 (Sydney, Australia time). Students must select one [1] of the articles that encompass research across six primary criminology topics. This assignment aims to deepen understanding of concepts, methods, analyses, and the implications for criminology. The review task must be submitted no later than 5:00pm on 15 September 2025 (Sydney, Australia time) via Canvas. Guidelines will be provided in class discussions.

Note: The chosen topic will inform subsequent research proposal task (see below).

The Review of Research Scholarship asks students to demonstrate their ability to critically analyse and evaluate research in criminology (ULO1, 2) and evaluate primary and secondary sources, and articulate research methodologies in criminology (ULO 3,4), communicating these clearly and in detail to a range of audiences (ULO5).

Special consideration: Successful grants of Special Consideration in relation to the review of research scholarship task may involve alternative tasks, as appropriate.

Research Proposal (60%): Students will develop a 5000-word (excluding footnotes and referencing) research proposal based on one of the six [6] topic areas chosen in the review of research scholarship task (above). The proposal must contain but is not limited to a detailed plan for conducting a criminological research project. The proposal must be submitted no later than 5:00pm on 13 October 2025 (Sydney, Australia time) via Canvas. Guidelines will be provided in class discussions.

Note (i): Students are expected to plan but NOT carry out the research project.

Note (ii): Students who are planning to enrol in LAWS6233/6234 Criminology Research Project A and B (12 credit points) https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/4533/pages/postgraduate-coursework-research-projects are encouraged to develop a proposal that might form the basis for that project.

The research proposal task asks students to demonstrate their ability to critically analyse the potential impact of the potential impact of research on criminology(ULO1) and communicate this effectively (ULO5). Additionally students will demonstrate their ability to engage with research methodologies and analysis of crime statistics (ULO2-4).

Word limit penalty: A piece of assessment which exceeds the prescribed word limit will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment for every 100 words, or part thereof. The total word count for essay and other written assessments will exclude all footnotes and any bibliography (if required), and exclude acknowledgements of assistance from editors, automated writing tools or generative AI (where use is permitted).

Referencing: The Sydney Law School expects you to use the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018) for your footnoting style, although you should confirm this with your lecturer. A link to the library website where this is set out comprehensively is available at Referencing and Citation Styles: AGLC4.

Special consideration: Successful grants of Special Consideration may involve alternative tasks, as appropriate.

Assessment requirements to pass a unit of study: A student must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks set out in this Unit of Study in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of Study.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2021 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name	Mark range	Description
High distinction	85 - 100	Completely answers the question. Contains striking originality of approach or analysis. Demonstrates exhaustive or innovative research (where independent research required). Exceptionally well written, structured and expressed. Is otherwise exceptional in some way.
Distinction	75 - 84	Completely answers the question. Achieves a critical and evaluative approach to the issues. Content and structure is well organised in support of the argument. Demonstrates extensive research and analysis to support a well-documented argument. Generally well expressed and free from errors. Has a clear structure and is well articulated.
Credit	65 - 74	Covers main issues fairly well in answering the question. Contains no significant errors. Demonstrates an attempted critical approach to the issues. Demonstrates reasonably sound research and analysis in addressing the key issues. Has a clear structure and reasonably clear expression.
Pass	50 - 64	Identifies the key issues, but does not follow through with a reasoned argument. Contains some significant errors. Displays satisfactory engagement with the key issues. Offers descriptive summary of material relevant to the question. Superficial use of material, and may display a tendency to paraphrase. Demonstrates little evidence of in-depth research or analysis. Adequate expression. Demonstrates the minimum level of competence and satisfies the requirements to proceed to higher-level studies.
Fail	0 - 49	Does not answer the question. Contains significant or numerous errors. Few or no identifiable arguments. Content that is inappropriate or irrelevant. Lack of research or analysis. Difficult or impossible to understand through poor grammar, expression or structure. Overall, does not demonstrate the minimum level of competence in the assessment.

For more information see guide to grades.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI)

You can use generative AI tools for open assessments. Restrictions on AI use apply to secure, supervised assessments used to confirm if students have met specific learning outcomes.

Refer to the assessment table above to see if AI is allowed, for assessments in this unit and check Canvas for full instructions on assessment tasks and AI use.

If you use AI, you must always acknowledge it. Misusing AI may lead to a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The late submission of a piece of assessment, without an approved extension, will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment per 24 hours or part thereof, after the due time on the due date. For example, a submission after the due time specified in the assessment summary but before the same time the following day will attract a 10% penalty. Penalties for late submission will be applied strictly, subject to a 5 minute grace period

Academic integrity

The University expects students to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

Our website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. This includes advice on how to avoid common breaches of academic integrity. Ensure that you have completed the Academic Honesty Education Module (AHEM) which is mandatory for all commencing coursework students

Penalties for serious breaches can significantly impact your studies and your career after graduation. It is important that you speak with your unit coordinator if you need help with completing assessments.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Learning support

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

Weekly schedule

WK	Topic	Learning activity
Week -02	SCANA [Student Communication and Needs Assessment]. A short online activity designed to give you insights into your academic language skills and connect you with relevant academic support to help you optimize your participation in your studies.	Independent study (1 hr)
	Introduction: unit logistics, and introducing research proposals, and link to theory, policy and practice	Seminar (2 hr)
	Designing research – research questions and ethical issues	Seminar (2 hr)
	Overview – Overview of the research process: Research design, methodology, and measurement in qualitative and quantitative research	Seminar (2 hr)
	Understanding and using court statistics and big data (Suzanne Poynton, NSW Bureau of crime Statistics and Research (BOCSAR))	Seminar (2 hr)
	Writing a literature review – and critical analysis of empirical research	Seminar (2 hr)
	Experimental and quasi-experimental designs	Seminar (2 hr)
Week 01	Surveys, sampling and ethics	Seminar (2 hr)
	Interviews, sampling and ethics	Seminar (2 hr)
	Field research: observations and ethnography	Seminar (2 hr)
	Qualitative data analysis	Seminar (2 hr)
	Media and research in criminology	Seminar (2 hr)
	Evaluation and policy research	Seminar (2 hr)
	Overview and finalising the research proposal	Seminar (2 hr)

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: All students are required to attend 70% of classes to satisfy the pass requirements for this unit. Failure to meet this requirement will result in an Absent Fail grade being recorded as the student’s result for this unit (see The University of Sydney Law School Resolutions: Coursework Awards cl 11).

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Tartaro, C. (2021). Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology: A Text and Reader. Routledge. Available as e-book in library.
Patten, M. and Newhart, M. (2018). Understanding Research Methods: An Overview of the Essentials (10th ed). New York: Taylor & Francis. Available as e-book in library.
Vogt, W.P., Vogt, E.R., Gardner, D.C. and Haeffele, L.M. (2012) When to Use What Research Design, New York: Guildford Press. Available as e-book in library.

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

Outcomes
Graduate qualities

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

LO1. Critically analyse and describe to an advanced level the significance of criminological research in the development and evaluation of criminal justice policy and practice
LO2. Critically evaluate crime research methodology, findings, and the analysis of crime statistics.
LO3. Identify and evaluate the sources and forms of crime data while applying ethical approaches and theory, and acknowledging issues in criminological research
LO4. Synthesise primary and secondary sources such as crime statistics, articulate research methodologies in criminology and evaluate relevant methods for data collection such as surveys, interviews, observations, and quasi-experiments.
LO5. Communicate complex research approaches in criminology clearly and in detail to a range of diverse audiences.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1	Depth of disciplinary expertise Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.
GQ2	Critical thinking and problem solving Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.
GQ3	Oral and written communication Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.
GQ4	Information and digital literacy Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.
GQ5	Inventiveness Generating novel ideas and solutions.
GQ6	Cultural competence Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.
GQ7	Interdisciplinary effectiveness Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.
GQ8	Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.
GQ9	Influence Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes	Graduate qualities
Learning outcomes

Responding to student feedback

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

No changes made since unit was last offered

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.

Current students

Overview

Overview

Unit details and rules

Teaching staff

Assessment

Assessment

Assessment summary

Assessment criteria

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI)

Late submission

Academic integrity

Learning support

Learning support

Simple extensions

Special consideration

Using AI responsibly

Support for students

Weekly schedule

Weekly schedule

Attendance and class requirements

Study commitment

Required readings

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes

Graduate qualities

Outcome map

Responding to student feedback

Responding to student feedback

Disclaimer

On this page

Useful links

LAWS6032: Crime Research and Policy

Intensive August - September, 2025 [Block mode] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

Overview

Overview

Unit details and rules

Teaching staff

Assessment

Assessment

Assessment summary

Assessment criteria

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI)

Late submission

Academic integrity

Learning support

Learning support

Simple extensions

Special consideration

Using AI responsibly

Support for students

Weekly schedule

Weekly schedule

Attendance and class requirements

Study commitment

Required readings

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes

Graduate qualities

Outcome map

Responding to student feedback

Responding to student feedback

Disclaimer

On this page

Useful links