Unit outline_

LAWS6032: Crime Research and Policy

Semester 2a, 2026 [Block mode] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This unit provides an examination of research methods in the context of criminology. The relationship between theory and methodology is explored. The production of knowledge about crime is critically assessed. Sources and forms of crime data are discussed and their significance is assessed. Research design, evaluation and analysis are also studied. This is a core unit for students enrolled in the Master of Criminology. Refer to the Sydney Law School timetable - https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/4533/pages/postgraduate-lecture-timetable

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Tyrone Kirchengast, tyrone.kirchengast@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 21 August 2026
Type Description Weight Due Length Use of AI
Written test In-semester test (40%)
1h + 15min reading time
40% Week 02
Due date: 14 Sep 2026 at 14:30
1 hour AI prohibited
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Out-of-class quiz Early Feedback Task Early Feedback Task (0%)
EFT
0% Week 02
Due date: 24 Jul 2026 at 23:59
5 questions / 30 minutes AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1
Written work Research Proposal (60%)
Written task
60% Week 08
Due date: 12 Oct 2026 at 23:59

Closing date: 26 Oct 2026
5000 words / 4 weeks AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
early feedback task = early feedback task ?

Assessment summary

Early Feedback Task (0%). This unit includes an Early Feedback Task that is designed to provide students with timely insights into their understanding and engagement with the unit content. The Early Feedback Task in this unit is a 5 question multiple choice quiz. The task will be available on Canvas from 11 to 14 August 2026, Sydney Australia time. It will be tailored to reflect key concepts from the first day of classes. Students will be provided with immediate automated feedback upon completion of the task. 

In-semester Test (40%). Students will undertake an in-semester test, worth 40%. Students will select one of 6 journal articles supplied via Canvas. The articles will be available from day one of class. In the test, students will be asked questions on the article they select and will be required to reflect on that article against the readings covered in the unit. The test will be closed book and students will not have access to the article they have selected for study. No support materials other than a dictionary will be permitted. The test will take place at 14:30 on 14 September 2026 and will be of one hour duration plus 15 minutes reading time.

Research Proposal (60%). Students will develop a 5000-word (including footnotes and referencing) research proposal. The proposal must contain but is not limited to a detailed plan for conducting a criminological research project. The proposal must be submitted no later than 23:59 on 12 October 2026 (Sydney, Australia time) via Canvas. Guidelines will be provided in class discussions.

Note (i): Students are expected to plan but NOT carry out the research project.

Note (ii): Students who are planning to enrol in LAWS6147 Independent Research Project (6 credit points) or  LAWS6182/LAWS6183 Independent Research Project A and B (12 credit points) https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/4533/pages/postgraduate-coursework-research-projects are encouraged to develop a proposal that might form the basis for that project. 

The research proposal task asks students to demonstrate their ability to critically analyse the potential impact of the potential impact of research on criminology(ULO1) and communicate this effectively (ULO5). Additionally students will demonstrate their ability to engage with research methodologies and analysis of crime statistics (ULO2-4).

 

Word limit penalty: A piece of assessment which exceeds the prescribed word limit will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment for every 100 words, or part thereof. The total word count for essay and other written assessments will exclude all footnotes and any bibliography (if required), and exclude acknowledgements of assistance from editors, automated writing tools or generative AI (where use is permitted). 

Referencing: The Sydney Law School expects you to use the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018) for your footnoting style, although you should confirm this with your lecturer. A link to the library website where this is set out comprehensively is available at Referencing and Citation Styles: AGLC4. 

Special consideration: Successful grants of Special Consideration may involve alternative tasks, as appropriate.  

Assessment requirements to pass a unit of study: A student must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks set out in this Unit of Study in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of Study. As the EFT is an early diagnostic tool, this task is not included in the final grade for the unit.  

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2021 (Schedule 1). 

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Contains striking originality of approach or analysis.
  • Demonstrates exhaustive or innovative research (where independent research required).
  • Exceptionally well written, structured and expressed.
  • Is otherwise exceptional in some way.

Distinction

75 - 84

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Achieves a critical and evaluative approach to the issues.
  • Content and structure is well organised in support of the argument.
  • Demonstrates extensive research and analysis to support a well-documented argument.
  • Generally well expressed and free from errors.
  • Has a clear structure and is well articulated.

Credit

65 - 74

  • Covers main issues fairly well in answering the question.
  • Contains no significant errors.
  • Demonstrates an attempted critical approach to the issues.
  • Demonstrates reasonably sound research and analysis in addressing the key issues.
  • Has a clear structure and reasonably clear expression.

Pass

50 - 64

  • Identifies the key issues, but does not follow through with a reasoned argument.
  • Contains some significant errors.
  • Displays satisfactory engagement with the key issues.
  • Offers descriptive summary of material relevant to the question.
  • Superficial use of material, and may display a tendency to paraphrase.
  • Demonstrates little evidence of in-depth research or analysis.
  • Adequate expression.
  • Demonstrates the minimum level of competence and satisfies the requirements to proceed to higher-level studies.

Fail

0 - 49

  • Does not answer the question.
  • Contains significant or numerous errors.
  • Few or no identifiable arguments.
  • Content that is inappropriate or irrelevant.
  • Lack of research or analysis.
  • Difficult or impossible to understand through poor grammar, expression or structure.
  • Overall, does not demonstrate the minimum level of competence in the assessment.

For more information see guide to grades.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI)

You can use generative AI tools for open assessments. Restrictions on AI use apply to secure, supervised assessments used to confirm if students have met specific learning outcomes.

Refer to the assessment table above to see if AI is allowed, for assessments in this unit and check Canvas for full instructions on assessment tasks and AI use.

If you use AI, you must always acknowledge it. Misusing AI may lead to a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The late submission of a piece of assessment, without an approved extension, will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment per 24 hours or part thereof, after the due time on the due date. Penalties for late submission will be applied strictly, subject to a 5 minute grace period.

Academic integrity

The University expects students to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

Our website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. This includes advice on how to avoid common breaches of academic integrity. Ensure that you have completed the Academic Honesty Education Module (AHEM) which is mandatory for all commencing coursework students

Penalties for serious breaches can significantly impact your studies and your career after graduation. It is important that you speak with your unit coordinator if you need help with completing assessments.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 02 SCANA [Student Communication and Needs Assessment]. A short online activity designed to give you insights into your academic language skills and connect you with relevant academic support to help you optimize your participation in your studies. Self-directed learning (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
• Introduction: Unit logistics and assessment requirements • Designing research – Research questions and ethical issues • Overview of the research process: Research design, methodology, and measurement Seminar (4.3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 03 • Writing a literature review – and critical analysis of empirical research • Understanding and using crime and court statistics and big data • Understanding and using crime and court statistics and big data Seminar (4.3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 04 • Experimental and quasi-experimental designs • Surveys, sampling and ethics and quantitative data analysis • Surveys, sampling and ethics and quantitative data analysis Seminar (4.3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 05 • Interviews, sampling, ethics and qualitative data analysis • Interviews, sampling, ethics and qualitative data analysis • Field research: observations and ethnography Seminar (4.3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 06 • Media and research in criminology • Evaluation and policy research Seminar (4.4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 07 • Review and discussion. Completion of Student Feedback Survey for this unit of study Seminar (4.4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: All students are required to attend 70% of classes to satisfy the pass requirements for this unit. Failure to meet this requirement will result in an Absent Fail grade being recorded as the student’s result for this unit (see The University of Sydney Law School Resolutions: Coursework Awards cl 11).  

 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

  • Tartaro, C. (2021). Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology: A Text and Reader. Routledge. Available as e-book in library.
  • Patten, M. and Newhart, M. (2018). Understanding Research Methods: An Overview of the Essentials (10th ed).  New York: Taylor & Francis. Available as e-book in library.
  • Vogt, W.P., Vogt, E.R., Gardner, D.C. and Haeffele, L.M. (2012) When to Use What Research Design, New York: Guildford Press.  Available as e-book in library.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Critically analyse and describe to an advanced level the significance of criminological research in the development and evaluation of criminal justice policy and practice
  • LO2. Critically evaluate crime research methodology, findings, and the analysis of crime statistics.
  • LO3. Identify and evaluate the sources and forms of crime data while applying ethical approaches and theory, and acknowledging issues in criminological research
  • LO4. Synthesise primary and secondary sources such as crime statistics, articulate research methodologies in criminology and evaluate relevant methods for data collection such as surveys, interviews, observations, and quasi-experiments.
  • LO5. Communicate complex research approaches in criminology clearly and in detail to a range of diverse audiences.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Assessment regime has changed.

Disclaimer

Important: the University of Sydney regularly reviews units of study and reserves the right to change the units of study available annually. To stay up to date on available study options, including unit of study details and availability, refer to the relevant handbook.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.