Skip to main content
Unit of study_

LAWS6077: Legal Research 1

Semester 1, 2024 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

The primary goal of this unit is to develop skills in undertaking a significant piece of legal research at levels of sophistication suitable for examination. At the conclusion of the unit it is anticipated that members of the class will be able to conceptualise the issues to be researched; will be able to locate relevant legal and other materials (using both hard copy and electronic bibliographic aids); will be able to place and sustain an argument (a 'thesis'); and will be able to assess both the quality of that work and to judge the merits of other approaches to planning such research. It is expected that students will become familiar with using comparative materials (both within the federation and international), and will gain a working familiarity with relevant research techniques of other disciplines in the social sciences. The unit aims to encourage debate about the respective merits of different approaches, ethical issues, and the hallmarks of 'quality' research.

Unit details and rules

Unit code LAWS6077
Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
None
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Yane Svetiev, yane.svetiev@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Critical Analysis (0%)
Critical analysis of another researcher's strategy essay
0% Formal exam period
Due date: 03 Jun 2024 at 18:00

Closing date: 17 Jun 2024
2000 words / 13 weeks
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Assignment Research Essay (100%)
A research strategy essay on student's thesis topic
100% Ongoing
Due date: 17 Jun 2024 at 18:00

Closing date: 01 Jul 2024
7000 words / 15 weeks
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Participation Workshop participation and presentation (0%)
Present and defend research essay in Sem 2
0% Week 11 6 hours
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2

Assessment summary

Assessment criteria

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of clear HDR standard, a distinction a very high HDR standard, a credit a good HDR standard but with significant work needed, and a pass a less than acceptable standard.  All grades need to be understood in the context of the detailed written feedback provided when material is returned to the candidate with that grade attached

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Work receiving a high distinction grade will exhibit the characteristic that it demonstrates very strong HDR thesis level performance (for the requisite thesis level) and/or confidence in thesis planning and execution, including but not limited to:
• its originality of thesis argument, methodological approach and analysis.
• its exhaustive or innovative research.
• its high proportion of publishable quality writing.

Distinction

75 - 84

Work receiving a distinction grade will generally exhibit high level attainment of or potential to reach all qualities relevant to the HDR thesis in question, but will have identified deficiencies that require to be rectified in order confidently to be assured of realising those qualities in the final thesis.

Credit

65 - 74

Work receiving a credit grade will generally reflect retention of confidence that a viable HDR thesis of the requisite standard is ultimately realisable, but that serious and potentially fatal deficiencies currently appear across one or more relevant thesis attributes, the rectification of which is vital.

Pass

50 - 64

Work receiving a pass grade will lack sufficient evidence of doctoral qualities or potential to achieve those standards in the future as to call for fundamental reconsideration, development of capacities or other quite major improvements in a thesis that on current indications is headed towards failure at assessment.  The pass grade is applied because the unit is a support seminar and the grade indications and other advice provided during the course are designed to enable the candidate to regain the qualities relevant to HDR level thesis work

Fail

0 - 49

A fail grade, which would effectively require repeating of the unit, and perhaps termination or suspension of candidature, is rarely ever considered.  Instead a very low pass grade is the preferred way of conveying that assessment to the candidate.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy 2023 reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy 2023. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 03 Structuring a thesis; whys and whats of a strategy Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 04 Introducing the electronic library Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 05 Managing references, reference materials and citations: using Endnote software Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 06 Using full text databases Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 07 The role of legal theory and theoretical paradigms Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 08 The role of surveys and social science methods Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 10 Interdisciplinary, law reform and social policy techniques Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 11 Planning and executing a research project Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Final workshop to be held mid-October in Semester 2. Seminar (6 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 12 Writing up research Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 13 The ethics of research Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: All students are required to attend at least 70% of classes and present at the workshop to satisfy the pass requirements for this unit of study. Failure to meet this requirement may result in a student being precluded from submitting the final assessment.

Referencing: Referencing should follow an accepted legal referencing style guide such as the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018*) or OSCOLO, or an Author date in-text referencing style (such as Harvard Social Science) as agreed after consulting the Unit Coordinator and HDR supervisory team.

Annual progress evaluation: Evidence of completion of this unit i.e. meeting your progress milestone must be provided. It is mandatory that YOU upload the Unit Coordinator’s graded assessment feedback form online with your next annual progress evaluation form when available.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

There is no prescribed list of readings, though Hutchinson (below) will be a very helpful acquisition.

Hutchinson, T., Researching and Writing in Law (Sydney: Thomson Reuters/Lawbook Co., 4th ed, 2018). 

Material will be referred to during the course, and students are expected to engage in independent reading on the topics covered.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Critically evaluate and refine their HDR thesis strategy, incorporating methodological approaches, theoretical frameworks, a preliminary exploration of the literature, and ethical considerations for ethics approval.
  • LO2. Conduct peer reviews, providing constructive critique and feedback, to gain diverse perspectives on HDR research approaches.
  • LO3. Employ and integrate fundamental legal research principles to conduct scholarly research in an HDR context, synthesizing HDR techniques, objectives, and legal research methodologies.
  • LO4. Search and select relevant primary and secondary legal and scholarly materials using online databases, professional publications, and grey literature.
  • LO5. Evaluate and choose appropriate methodologies and data collection techniques for legal and interdisciplinary research, tailored to their thesis objectives.
  • LO6. Articulate and defend research arguments, addressing challenges, ethical considerations, and assessment criteria in legal and scholarly research.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Changes have been made to the assessments.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.