Unit outline_

LAWS6141: Asia Pacific Environmental Law

Intensive September - October, 2025 [Block mode] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

In this unit, the environmental law and policy of selected countries and regional organisations in the Asia Pacific will be studied against the background of relevant international environmental law and institutions. Unit topics will be divided into four sub-regions: Pacific Island Developing Countries, South East Asia Region ASEAN and Mekong countries, North Asian Region, Japan, Peoples Republic of China, South Asian Region, South Asian Association of Regional Cooperation SAARC Countries. In relation to each region the implications of international and regional environmental law and institutions will be explored followed by country specific case studies involving a range of issues such as biodiversity access to modern energy services, natural resources and environmental planning, industrial pollution, environmental impact assessment, climate change and protection of the marine and coastal environment. Case studies on regional environmental issues such as ASEAN Haze will also be included. Refer to the Sydney Law School timetable - https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/4533/pages/postgraduate-lecture-timetable

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Rosemary Lyster, rosemary.lyster@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Manuel Solis, manuel.solis@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 3 October 2025
Type Description Weight Due Length Use of AI
Presentation group assignment Group presentation – World Climate simulation Exercise (10%)
Group presentation – World Climate simulation Exercise
10% Week 02
Due date: 04 Oct 2025 at 09:00

Closing date: 04 Oct 2025
10 minutes with PPT / 4 days AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5
Written work Individual Position Statement (20%)
Individual Position Statement
20% Week 03
Due date: 07 Oct 2025 at 17:00

Closing date: 21 Oct 2025
1500 words /1 week AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5 LO3
Written work Article response - critical analysis (70%)
Article response - critical analysis
70% Week 10
Due date: 29 Nov 2025 at 17:00

Closing date: 13 Dec 2025
5000 words /8 weeks AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

Group presentation (10%): Students will have to do a group presentation during the World Climate simulation exercise in class in a 10-minute presentation involving powerpoint slides. The purpose of this assessment task is to assess the group’s ability to collaboratively simulate an international climate negotiation, articulate legal and policy positions, and present the outcomes effectively. This will be due at 9am on 4 October 2025 (Sydney, Australia time). Information for the group sign up and the World Climate Simulation exercise will be available on Canvas. Students will have at least 72 hours to prepare.

The rubric for this assignment will be available on Canvas.

Individual Position Statement (20%): Students must write an individual position statement of no more than 1000 words that includes each student’s critical reflection, legal reasoning, and articulation of their assigned stakeholder’s position in the simulation. This will be due at 5.00pm 7 October 2025 (Sydney, Australia time).

The rubric and guide questions for this assignment will be available on Canvas.

Article response-critical analysis (70%): As part of your assessment for this unit, you are required to write a critical response to a selected scholarly article related to Asia Pacific Environmental law. The articles will be available on Canvas. This task is designed to develop your ability to engage with legal scholarship, apply critical reasoning, and connect theoretical arguments with recent legal and policy developments at national regional and international levels.

Your article response may be no more than 5,000 words in length (excluding references). This will be due at  5pm on 29 November 2025 (Sydney, Australia time).

The rubric for this assignment will be available on Canvas.

Word limit penalty: A piece of assessment which exceeds the prescribed word limit will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment for every 100 words, or part thereof. The total word count for essay and other written assessments will exclude all footnotes and any bibliography (if required), and exclude acknowledgements of assistance from editors, automated writing tools or generative AI (where use is permitted). 

Referencing: The Sydney Law School expects you to use the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018) for your footnoting style, although you should confirm this with your lecturer. A link to the library website where this is set out comprehensively is available at Referencing and Citation Styles: AGLC4. 

Special consideration: Successful grants of Special Consideration may involve alternative tasks, as appropriate.

Assessment requirements to pass a unit of study: A student must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks set out in this Unit of Study in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of Study. 

Assessment criteria

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Contains striking originality of approach or analysis.
  • Demonstrates exhaustive or innovative research (where independent research required).
  • Exceptionally well written, structured and expressed.
  • Is otherwise exceptional in some way.

Distinction

75 - 84

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Achieves a critical and evaluative approach to the issues.
  • Content and structure is well organised in support of the argument.
  • Demonstrates extensive research and analysis to support a well-documented argument.
  • Generally well expressed and free from errors.
  • Has a clear structure and is well articulated.

Credit

65 - 74

  • Covers main issues fairly well in answering the question.
  • Contains no significant errors.
  • Demonstrates an attempted critical approach to the issues.
  • Demonstrates reasonably sound research and analysis in addressing the key issues.
  • Has a clear structure and reasonably clear expression.

Pass

50 - 64

  • Identifies the key issues, but does not follow through with a reasoned argument.
  • Contains some significant errors.
  • Displays satisfactory engagement with the key issues.
  • Offers a descriptive summary of material relevant to the question.
  • Superficial use of material, and may display a tendency to paraphrase.
  • Demonstrates little evidence of in-depth research or analysis.
  • Adequate expression.
  • Overall, demonstrates the minimum level of competence in the assessment and satisfies the requirements to proceed to higher-level studies in the degree or subject area.

Fail

0 - 49

  • Does not answer the question.
  • Contains significant or numerous errors.
  • Few or no identifiable arguments.
  • Content that is inappropriate or irrelevant.
  • Lack of research or analysis.
  • Difficult or impossible to understand through poor grammar, expression or structure.
  • Overall, does not demonstrate the minimum level of competence in the assessment.

For more information see guide to grades.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI)

You can use generative AI tools for open assessments. Restrictions on AI use apply to secure, supervised assessments used to confirm if students have met specific learning outcomes.

Refer to the assessment table above to see if AI is allowed, for assessments in this unit and check Canvas for full instructions on assessment tasks and AI use.

If you use AI, you must always acknowledge it. Misusing AI may lead to a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The late submission of a piece of assessment, without an approved extension, will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment per 24 hours or part thereof, after the due time on the due date. For example, a submission after the due time specified in the assessment summary but before the same time the following day will attract a 10% penalty.

Academic integrity

The University expects students to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

Our website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. This includes advice on how to avoid common breaches of academic integrity. Ensure that you have completed the Academic Honesty Education Module (AHEM) which is mandatory for all commencing coursework students

Penalties for serious breaches can significantly impact your studies and your career after graduation. It is important that you speak with your unit coordinator if you need help with completing assessments.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Intro class (via Zoom) 25 September (6-8pm) Online class (2 hr) LO1 LO4 LO5
Week 02 Introduction • State of the environment and the triple planetary crisis • International environmental principles (Rio Principles) Seminar (1.5 hr) LO1 LO4 LO5
Introduction continued (Rio Principles) Seminar (1.5 hr) LO1 LO4 LO5
Biodiversity issues in Southeast Asia Seminar (1.5 hr) LO1 LO4 LO5
Environmental and climate litigation in the Asia Pacific Seminar (1.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5
Environmental and climate litigation in the Asia Pacific (continued) Seminar (1.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5
Climate-induced loss and damage in the Asia Pacific region (Part 1) Seminar (1.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5
Climate-induced loss and damage in the Asia Pacific region (Part 2) Seminar (1.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5
Climate-induced loss and damage in the Asia Pacific region (Part 3) Seminar (1.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5
Climate-induced loss and damage in the Asia Pacific region (Part 4) Seminar (1.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5
International climate change law and policymaking • World Climate Simulation Seminar (1.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
International climate change law and policymaking • World Climate Simulation (continued) Seminar (1.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
International climate change law and policymaking • World Climate Simulation (continued) Seminar (1.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
International climate change law and policymaking • World Climate Simulation (continued) Seminar (1.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
International climate change negotiations and processes Seminar (1.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Environmental and climate justice Seminar (1.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Energy and just transition Seminar (1.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: All students are required to attend 70% of classes to satisfy the pass requirements for this unit. Failure to meet this requirement will result in an Absent Fail grade being recorded as the student’s result for this unit (see The University of Sydney Law School Resolutions: Coursework Awards cl 11).  

 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All readings for this unit are available on Canvas on the Reading List tab.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Analyse the development of environmental law and policy in the Asia Pacific region.
  • LO2. Critically evaluate environmental challenges in the Asia Pacific and propose legal solutions to address them.
  • LO3. Apply relevant legal research methodologies to the creation of sound, logically structured legal argument(s) and report findings.
  • LO4. Expertly collaborate to communicate complex legal concepts to diverse (professional and non-professional) audiences.
  • LO5. Apply environmental law to complex, real-world scenarios and critically assess its effectiveness in addressing practical challenges.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Changes have been made to the assessment schedule and Unit Learning Outcomes since the unit last ran.

Disclaimer

Important: the University of Sydney regularly reviews units of study and reserves the right to change the units of study available annually. To stay up to date on available study options, including unit of study details and availability, refer to the relevant handbook.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.