Unit outline_

LAWS6856: International Counter-Terrorism Law

Intensive April - May, 2025 [Block mode] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This unit explores how international law has confronted terrorist violence from the mid-19th century to the present, including under transnational and international criminal law, the law on the use of military force, the law of armed conflict, human rights law, measures adopted by the United Nations Security Council and General Assembly, and the law of state responsibility. It considers controversies about the (in)adequacy of the law in areas such as targeted killings' (or extrajudicial assassinations), aerial drones, detention and trial of suspects, irregular renditions' (illegal abductions), enhanced interrogation' (torture), shoot to kill' policies, foreign terrorist fighters and citizen stripping, mass surveillance and privacy, and public emergency laws. Selected regional laws (in Europe, the Americas, Asia and Africa) and national laws (particularly in Australia, the UK and the US) implementing international obligations are also considered. The study of terrorism, and the law's response to it, is ultimately a study of when violence is justified, against whom, and for what purposes whether it is freedom fighters' or state terrorism', or extreme religious challenges to secular norms, at issue. Refer to the Sydney Law School timetable - https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/4533/pages/postgraduate-lecture-timetable

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
CISS6011 or LAWS3483
Assumed knowledge
? 

Students should have either completed LAWS6243 International Law I or have an understanding in at least one of the following areas: public or a specialised area of international law or criminal law or criminology or human rights or security and conflict studies acquired through university studies and/or relevant professional experience

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Tim Stephens, tim.stephens@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Helen Duffy, helen.duffy@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 2 May 2025
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Short answer assignment (40%)
4 equally weighted short answer questions (1000 words per answer)
0% Formal exam period
Due date: 09 Jun 2025 at 16:00

Closing date: 23 Jun 2025
4000 words / 3.5 weeks
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO4 LO5 LO1 LO3
Assignment Alternative Capstone Essay (80%)
optional capstone essay
0% Formal exam period
Due date: 09 Jun 2025 at 16:00

Closing date: 23 Jun 2025
7000 words / 6 weeks
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Presentation Class Presentation (20%)
Presentation on a specific case or topic.
0% Week 01 5 - 7 minutes subject to class size
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO3 LO4
Short release assignment Alternative Capstone essay proposal (0%)
proposal for optional capstone essay
0% Week 01
Due date: 26 Apr 2025 at 09:00

Closing date: 26 Apr 2025
500 words / 72 hours
Outcomes assessed: LO5 LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Assignment Problem-based assignment (40%)
Problem Assignment
0% Week 06
Due date: 27 May 2025 at 16:00

Closing date: 03 Jun 2025
3000 words / 2 weeks
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

Assessment summary

Class Presentation (20%)

A presentation of 5 – 7 minutes on specific case/topic that raises relevant issues from the course. Students will be required to prepare well and engage during the class. Instructions will be on Canvas, and further information and guidance will be provided by the unit coordinator at the start of the unit.  

Problem-based Assignment (40%)

3000-word problem-based assignment question which will be released on Canvas on Monday 12 May 2025 at 9am and is due on Tuesday 27 May 2025 at 4pm (Sydney, Australia time).  

Short-answer Assignment (40%)

4000-word short answer assignment consisting of four equally weighted questions – 1000 words per answer. The assignment questions will be released on Canvas on Friday 16 May 2025 at 9am and the submission is due on Monday 9 June 2025 at 4pm (Sydney Australia time).

Alternative LLM Capstone Essay

LLM students who are undertaking this unit towards the end of their degree and need a capstone experience to complete the degree must apply to the unit coordinator to undertake the assessment option of a 7,000-word capstone essay (80%) plus a 500-word (0%) proposal.  The capstone essay and proposal will replace the problem-based assignment (40%) and the short answer assignment (40%).

Alternative Capstone Essay Proposal – 500 words (0%)

Students who wish to complete a Capstone essay must submit a 500-word proposal (0%) for prior approval by 9am (Sydney, Australia time) on 26 April 2025. Your essay topic must respond to the material covered in the present unit. However at the same time, in order to serve as a Capstone for your LLM, it should build upon the learning that has taken place during your LLM studies more generally.

Alternative Capstone Essay - 7000 words (80%)

Students are required to submit a 7000-word capstone essay (80%) where the word count includes everything in the text i.e. body text, in-text citations, headings, quotations.  Bibliography and footnotes are not included in the word count.

Students are required to submit Capstone essays in electronic form via the Canvas site by 4pm (Sydney, Australia time) on 9 June 2025.

Word limit penalty: A piece of assessment which exceeds the prescribed word limit will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment for every 100 words, or part thereof. The total word count for essay and other written assessments will exclude all footnotes and any bibliography (if required), and exclude acknowledgements of permissible assistance from editors, automated writing tools or generative AI (where use is permitted). 

Use of editors or proof-readers: The use of assistance in preparing and editing assessment tasks in this unit of study is strictly prohibited. Assistance includes human and automated writing tools (not including spell checking). 

Special consideration: Successful grants of Special Consideration may involve alternative tasks, as appropriate. 

Assessment requirements to pass a unit of study: A student must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks set out in this Unit of Study in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of Study. 

 

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2021 (Schedule 1). 

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Contains striking originality of approach or analysis.
  • Demonstrates exhaustive or innovative research (where independent research required).
  • Exceptionally well written, structured and expressed.
  • Is otherwise exceptional in some way.

Distinction

75 - 84

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Achieves a critical and evaluative approach to the issues.
  • Content and structure is well organised in support of the argument.
  • Demonstrates extensive research and analysis to support a well-documented argument.
  • Generally well expressed and free from errors.
  • Has a clear structure and is well articulated.

Credit

65 - 74

  • Covers main issues fairly well in answering the question.
  • Contains no significant errors.
  • Demonstrates an attempted critical approach to the issues.
  • Demonstrates reasonably sound research and analysis in addressing the key issues.
  • Has a clear structure and reasonably clear expression.

Pass

50 - 64

  • Identifies the key issues, but does not follow through with a reasoned argument.
  • Contains some significant errors.
  • Displays satisfactory engagement with the key issues.
  • Offers descriptive summary of material relevant to the question.
  • Superficial use of material, and may display a tendency to paraphrase.
  • Demonstrates little evidence of in-depth research or analysis.
  • Adequate expression.
  • Demonstrates the minimum level of competence and satisfies the requirements to proceed to higher-level studies.

Fail

0 - 49

  • Does not answer the question.
  • Contains significant or numerous errors.
  • Few or no identifiable arguments.
  • Content that is inappropriate or irrelevant.
  • Lack of research or analysis.
  • Difficult or impossible to understand through poor grammar, expression or structure.
  • Overall, does not demonstrate the minimum level of competence in the assessment.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

Except for supervised exams or in-semester tests, you may use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessments unless expressly prohibited by your unit coordinator. 

For exams and in-semester tests, the use of AI and automated writing tools is not allowed unless expressly permitted in the assessment instructions. 

The icons in the assessment table above indicate whether AI is allowed – whether full AI, or only some AI (the latter is referred to as “AI restricted”). If no icon is shown, AI use is not permitted at all for the task. Refer to Canvas for full instructions on assessment tasks for this unit. 

Your final submission must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of automated writing tools or generative AI, and any material generated that you include in your final submission must be properly referenced. You may be required to submit generative AI inputs and outputs that you used during your assessment process, or drafts of your original work. Inappropriate use of generative AI is considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply. 

The Current Students website provides information on artificial intelligence in assessments. For help on how to correctly acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the  AI in Education Canvas site

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The late submission of a piece of assessment, without an approved extension, will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment per 24 hours or part thereof, after the due time on the due date. For example, a submission after the due time specified in the assessment summary but before the same time the following day will attract a 10% penalty.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 1. The International Legal Framework, Actors and Institutions 2. "Terrorism" Seminar (6.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
3. The Use of Force and the Law of Armed Conflict 4. International Human Rights Law (Applicability) Seminar (6.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
5. Crime 6. Selected Rights Issues Seminar (6.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
7. Specific issues contd and Case Study: Torture and Arbitrary Detention 8. Concluding Reflections Seminar (6.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: All students are required to attend 70% of classes to satisfy the pass requirements for this unit. Failure to meet this requirement will result in an Absent Fail grade being recorded as the student’s result for this unit (see The University of Sydney Law School Resolutions: Coursework Awards cl 11).

Referencing: The Sydney Law School expects you to use the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018) for your footnoting style, although you should confirm this with your lecturer. A link to the library website where this is set out comprehensively is available at Referencing and Citation Styles: AGLC4. 

 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All readings for this unit can be accessed through the reading list, available on Canvas. Recommended readings are in the Learning Guide.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Identify, describe, and critically analyse the sources and content of terrorism and other relevant laws discussed in each of the topic areas in the unit of study.
  • LO2. Critically evaluate the processes of anti-terrorism law making and the strengths, and limitations of anti-terrorism laws.
  • LO3. Apply advanced legal analysis and reasoning skills to complex counter-terrorism issues
  • LO4. Examine the political, ideological, ethical, and philosophical implications of terrorism laws
  • LO5. Apply relevant legal research methodologies to the synthesis of primary and secondary sources to communicate sound legal analyses of anti-terrorism laws and issues to lay and specialist audiences.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Change of assessment regime since last offering in 2021.

Disclaimer

Important: the University of Sydney regularly reviews units of study and reserves the right to change the units of study available annually. To stay up to date on available study options, including unit of study details and availability, refer to the relevant handbook.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.