MARC5110: Semester 2, 2021

University home

Library

Current students

Staff intranet

Find an event

Give

Current students

Units MARC5110 Semester 2 2021 [Normal day]

Unit of study_

MARC5110: Contemporary Architectural Theory

Semester 2, 2021 [Normal day] - Remote

Overview

The objective of this unit is to orientate students within the landscape of debate around contemporary architecture. Perspectives on this objective will change from year to year, but will work within the trajectory the Enlightenment to the present. Emphasis is placed on analysis of theories and positions of direct import to architectural design. Emphasis is also placed on the specific situations and cultural and philosophical contexts in which those theories arose, and ultimately how they were represented within the domain of architecture. It is organized predominantly as a conceptual survey which clearly identifies particular trains of thought in their continuity and transformation. Students will become generally conversant in the principles of theories central to contemporary architectural practice and debate, and will understand their terms and references. Through reading and participation in seminars, students will acquire the literacy required to perceive and articulate contemporary theoretical standpoints, and will refine their research and writing skills through independent research into a defined aspect of contemporary architectural theory. Close attention will be paid to the exchange between practice and theory and the relevance of the discussed theories to the formation of current circumstances, and to the place of architecture within contemporary culture.

Unit details and rules

Unit code	MARC5110
Academic unit	Architecture
Credit points	6
Prohibitions ?	None
Prerequisites ?	None
Corequisites ?	None
Assumed knowledge ?	None
Available to study abroad and exchange students	Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator	Andrew Leach, andrew.leach@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s)	Andrew Leach, andrew.leach@sydney.edu.au

Type	Description	Weight	Due	Length
Assignment	Assignment 2: Make Your Case Essay. Full brief to be published on Canvas.	70%	Formal exam period Due date: 25 Nov 2021 at 23:00 Closing date: 03 Dec 2021	6000 words max (incl notes)
Outcomes assessed:
Assignment	Assignment 1: Terms of Engagement Elements will include bibliographic and exploratory studies, see Canvas.	30%	Week 05 Due date: 10 Sep 2021 at 23:00 Closing date: 03 Dec 2021	Dossier of work-in-progress exercises.
Outcomes assessed:

Assessment summary

Students will across the semester engage in exploratory and preparatory work towards a final essay. Skills will include bibliographic research and analysis, writing and expression, referencing and ethical research practice. The essay will be a mature contribution to contemporary architectural debate.

Assessment criteria

Assignment 1 (30 marks available): mark range FA-HD, submission required.

Assignment 2 (70 marks available): mark range FA-HD, submission required.

Cumulative marks of 50/100 required for a course pass, with 65 needed for CR, 75 D, and 85 HD. Failure to submit work will result in AF.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

To be applied consistent with ADP policy.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Learning support

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Weekly schedule

WK	Topic	Learning activity
Week 01	We need to talk about ... theory.	Seminar (2 hr)
Week 02	We need to talk about ... housing.	Seminar (2 hr)
Week 03	We need to talk about ... public life.	Seminar (2 hr)
Week 04	Research, Analysis and Documentation	Workshop (2 hr)
Week 05	We need to talk about ... the 70s.	Seminar (2 hr)
Week 06	We need to talk about ... money.	Seminar (2 hr)
Week 07	Writing Theory I	Workshop (2 hr)
Week 08	We need to talk about ... the environment.	Seminar (2 hr)
Week 09	We need to talk about ... history.	Seminar (2 hr)
Week 10	We need to talk about ... labour.	Seminar (2 hr)
Week 11	We need to talk about ... the countryside.	Seminar (2 hr)
Week 12	We need to talk about ... criticism.	Seminar (2 hr)
Week 13	Writing Theory II	Workshop (2 hr)

Attendance and class requirements

Requirements will be consistent with ADP policy.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Each seminar will require preparatory reading and/or viewing that will be advised at least one week in advance. The focus of each will be subject to a brief orientation presentation, in which the week’s themes and literature are introduced, likewise the key questions and discussion topics of the seminar.

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

Outcomes
Graduate qualities

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

LO1. Demonstrate an advanced familiarity with the landscape of contemporary debate around architecture, broadly conceived and theorised, and with the literature of architectural theory.
LO2. Explain a set of specific theoretical and conceptual notions (to be determined by the UoS coordinator each year) within the broader scope of contemporary architectural theory.
LO3. Conduct research using a range of physical and online resources to advance knowledge of a specific research question in the realm of contemporary architectural theory, and apply skills to analyse and assess information on architectural works and themes from a range of sources.
LO4. Critique architectural theories and conceptual notions and articulate an individual position with a view to engaging in debate on issues raised in the course.
LO5. Identify and interpret the state of debate and scholarship on defined topics within its broad scope, and understand the role of specific individuals and institutions in shaping knowledge of the theory of architecture.
LO6. Demonstrate formal skills in written, verbal and visual communication for both academic and professional settings.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1	Depth of disciplinary expertise Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.
GQ2	Critical thinking and problem solving Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.
GQ3	Oral and written communication Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.
GQ4	Information and digital literacy Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.
GQ5	Inventiveness Generating novel ideas and solutions.
GQ6	Cultural competence Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.
GQ7	Interdisciplinary effectiveness Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.
GQ8	Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.
GQ9	Influence Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes	Graduate qualities
Learning outcomes

Responding to student feedback

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This is the first time MARC5110 Contemporary Architectural Theory has been offered.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.

Current students

Overview

Overview

Unit details and rules

Teaching staff

Assessment

Assessment

Assessment summary

Assessment criteria

Late submission

Academic integrity

Learning support

Learning support

Simple extensions

Special consideration

Using AI responsibly

Weekly schedule

Weekly schedule

Attendance and class requirements

Study commitment

Required readings

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes

Graduate qualities

Outcome map

Responding to student feedback

Responding to student feedback

Disclaimer

On this page

Useful links

Media

Student links

About us

Connect