Unit outline_

PAED5005: Evidence and Ethics in Paediatric Medicine

Semester 2, 2025 [Online] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This capstone unit for the Master of Medicine (Child and Adolescent Health) degree aims to develop students' ethical, reflective, critical thinking and evidence-based decision-making skills, required to inform best clinical practice. The unit is structured in two parts: an introduction to key ethical concepts and methods of ethical analysis; and an overview of evidence relevant to health care practice and research. This will involve development of a clinical question, a literature search and review of selected studies, and application of critical appraisal skills. Learning modules include further development of literature search and critical appraisal skills, applying decision analysis to facilitate shared decision-making in practice, and application of evidence to inform individual patient care. The unit brings together topics covered in other stream specific units in the MMED (Child and Adolescent Health) course with critical appraisal and basic epidemiology.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Paediatrics
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
CEPI5100 and 18 credit points of stream specific units of study from any of (PAED5000 or PAED5001 or PAED5002 or PAED5003 or PAED5004 or PAED5006 or PAED5007 or PAED5008 or PMED5100 or PMED5101 or PMED5102 or PMED5103)
Prohibitions
? 
BETH5208 or CRIT5008
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Patrina Caldwell, patrina.caldwell@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Shekeeb Mohammad, shekeeb.mohammad@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 1 September 2025
Type Description Weight Due Length Use of AI
Out-of-class quiz Evidence Assessment 1: Case Selection
Case Selection
0% Week 01
Due date: 10 Aug 2025 at 23:59
- AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO4
Written work Ethics Assessment 1: Reflection post
Written task
0% Week 02
Due date: 17 Aug 2025 at 23:59
- AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3
Debate Ethics Assessment 2: Debate
Debate
10% Week 03
Due date: 24 Aug 2025 at 23:59
- AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO3
Written work Early Feedback Task Evidence Assessment 2: Search
Written task
10% Week 05
Due date: 07 Sep 2025 at 23:59
- AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO4 LO5 LO6
Written work Early Feedback Task Ethics Assessment 3: Case commentary
Written task
10% Week 07
Due date: 21 Sep 2025 at 23:59
- AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3
Written work Evidence Assessment 3: Critical Appraisal
Critical appraisal
30% Week 10
Due date: 19 Oct 2025 at 23:59
- AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO7 LO8
Written work Ethics Assessment 4: Revise and Resubmit Case Commentary
Written task
20% Week 12
Due date: 02 Nov 2025 at 23:59
- AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3
Presentation Evidence Assessment 4: Presentation
Recorded Presentation uploaded to Canvas
20% Week 13
Due date: 09 Nov 2025 at 23:59
- AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO7 LO8
early feedback task = early feedback task ?

Assessment summary

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see guide to grades.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI)

You can use generative AI tools for open assessments. Restrictions on AI use apply to secure, supervised assessments used to confirm if students have met specific learning outcomes.

Refer to the assessment table above to see if AI is allowed, for assessments in this unit and check Canvas for full instructions on assessment tasks and AI use.

If you use AI, you must always acknowledge it. Misusing AI may lead to a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The University expects students to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

Our website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. This includes advice on how to avoid common breaches of academic integrity. Ensure that you have completed the Academic Honesty Education Module (AHEM) which is mandatory for all commencing coursework students

Penalties for serious breaches can significantly impact your studies and your career after graduation. It is important that you speak with your unit coordinator if you need help with completing assessments.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Module 1: What is evidence and Ethics and why does it matter? Online class (10 hr)  
Week 02 Module 1: What is evidence and Ethics and why does it matter? Online class (10 hr)  
Week 03 Module 1: What is evidence and Ethics and why does it matter? Online class (10 hr)  
Week 04 Module 2: What methods and tools do we use in Evidence and Ethics? Online class (10 hr)  
Week 05 Module 2: What methods and tools do we use in Evidence and Ethics? Online class (10 hr)  
Week 06 Module 2: What methods and tools do we use in Evidence and Ethics? Online class (10 hr)  
Week 07 Module 3: How does Evidence and Ethics guide us in decision making and leadership? Online class (10 hr)  
Week 08 Module 3: How does Evidence and Ethics guide us in decision making and leadership? Online class (10 hr)  
Week 09 Module 3: How does Evidence and Ethics guide us in decision making and leadership? Online class (10 hr)  
Week 10 Module 4: How does Evidence and Ethics lead us to be better clinicians? Online class (10 hr)  
Week 11 Module 4: How does Evidence and Ethics lead us to be better clinicians? Online class (10 hr)  
Week 12 Module 4: How does Evidence and Ethics lead us to be better clinicians? Online class (10 hr)  
Week 13 Module 4: How does Evidence and Ethics lead us to be better clinicians? Online class (10 hr)  

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All readings for this unit can be accessed on Canvas

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Explain and compare the features of predominant ethical theories relevant to evidence-based health care practice and research
  • LO2. Describe and critically evaluate ethical principles and concepts such as autonomy, capacity, vulnerability, best interests and consent and their role in health care practice and research
  • LO3. Apply these ethical concepts to relevant contemporary issues or challenges in health care practice and research
  • LO4. Formulate a clinical question so that it fits into one of the four main areas (diagnosis, prognosis, intervention, harm) and can be answered by finding and using the best evidence
  • LO5. Select sources of EBM material appropriate for a given question
  • LO6. Retrieve appropriate evidence through optimal querying of selected sources
  • LO7. Appraise retrieved evidence for validity, importance and applicability including how the limitations of retrieved evidence modify its applicability to patient care
  • LO8. Apply the factors involved in clinical decision making as they relate to an individual patient.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

We value your feedback about any aspect of the unit of study and your experience as a student of Sydney Medical School. To help ensure our courses meet your needs and maintain a high standard, we welcome your feedback at any time and we ask you to complete the Mid-Semester Evaluation Survey and the Unit of Study Survey at the end of the semester. Your ratings and comments are anonymous and specifying what you liked and didn’t like about any of the learning materials, assessment items, discussion forums, feedback etc will help us to target our improvement efforts. Please note that your participation in this unit of study permits de-identified information about your learning experience and interaction with learning resources to be used for the purpose of improving the student learning experience.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.