Unit outline_

PHIL2687: Existentialism and Lived Experience

Semester 2, 2025 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This unit examines a major movement in 19th and 20th century European philosophy, with a focus on key questions and figures from the movement. Topics to be considered include: the possibility of morality after the death of God, meaning in human life, the self, freedom, finitude, and historicity. The unit develops these topics in communication with early modern and modern discussions on the role of feelings, passions, and lived experience in processes of self-constitution and the shaping of interpersonal relationships.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Philosophy
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
12 credit points at 1000 level in Philosophy
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
PHIL2648 or PHIL2675
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator David Macarthur, david.macarthur@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 1 September 2025
Type Description Weight Due Length Use of AI
Written work group assignment Critical Essay
A critical philosophical essay using course readings and secondary literature.
50% Formal exam period
Due date: 17 Nov 2025 at 23:59

Closing date: 01 Dec 2025
20 days - 2500 words AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Contribution hurdle task group assignment Tutorial contribution and participation
Contribution and participation in tutorials
15% Ongoing
Due date: 09 Nov 2025 at 23:59

Closing date: 01 Dec 2025
On-going AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Contribution Early Feedback Task Discussion Post - Early Feedback Task
Short discussion post which serves as a draft for your tutorial presentation. See canvas for further details. #earlyfeedbacktask
0% Week 03
Due date: 22 Aug 2025 at 23:59
Short discussion post AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO7
Written work Take-home assignment
This is a comprehension exercize requiring philosophical exegesis and clarification. The student is asked not to engage in critical reflections. No secondary reading beyond the reader is required.
35% Week 06
Due date: 12 Sep 2025 at 23:59

Closing date: 17 Oct 2025
10 days - 2000 words AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
hurdle task = hurdle task ?
group assignment = group assignment ?
early feedback task = early feedback task ?

Early feedback task

This unit includes an early feedback task, designed to give you feedback prior to the census date for this unit. Details are provided in the Canvas site and your result will be recorded in your Marks page. It is important that you actively engage with this task so that the University can support you to be successful in this unit.

Assessment summary

A philosophy assignment or essay will be judged according to the following criteria:
- clarity of exposition
- accuracy of understanding
- the ability to support one's claims with reasons and argument
- originality and the use of one's own examples
- consistency and coherence

Better grades correspond to being able to meet these criteria to a higher degree.

Assessment criteria

  Result Range Description
  Pass 50-64 Satisfactorily meets the grading criteria
  Credit 65-74 Meets the grading criteria fairly well
  Distinction 75-84 Meets the grading criteria with distinction
  High Distinction 85-100 Meets the grading criteria excellently

 

For more information see guide to grades.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI)

You can use generative AI tools for open assessments. Restrictions on AI use apply to secure, supervised assessments used to confirm if students have met specific learning outcomes.

Refer to the assessment table above to see if AI is allowed, for assessments in this unit and check Canvas for full instructions on assessment tasks and AI use.

If you use AI, you must always acknowledge it. Misusing AI may lead to a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

5% per day. Max of 10 days.

Academic integrity

The University expects students to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

Our website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. This includes advice on how to avoid common breaches of academic integrity. Ensure that you have completed the Academic Honesty Education Module (AHEM) which is mandatory for all commencing coursework students

Penalties for serious breaches can significantly impact your studies and your career after graduation. It is important that you speak with your unit coordinator if you need help with completing assessments.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 02 Hegel and Marx on alienation Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 03 Phenomenology Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 04 Sartre on human existence Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 05 Dualisms dissolved Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 06 Self and others Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 07 Cavell on the problem of the other Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 08 Sartre on bad faith Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 09 Absurdity Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 10 Freedom and ethics Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 11 Sartre responds to critics Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 12 Existentialism and literature 1 Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 13 Existentialism and literature 2 Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Weekly Weekly 1HR Tutorials (note tutorials beginn Week 2) Tutorial (13 hr)  

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance in tutorials is compulsory and will be counted towards the assessment for the class

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

  • Week 1: David Cooper, Existentialism (Blackwell, 1999), ch.1
  • Week 2: Cooper, ch.2
  • Week 3: Cooper, ch.3
  • Week 4: Cooper, ch.4
  • Week 5: Cooper, ch.5
  • Week 6: Cooper, ch.6
  • Week 7: Stanley Cavell, The Claim of Reason (Oxford, 1979), Part IV
  • Week 8: Cooper, ch.7
  • Week 9: Cooper, ch.8
  • Week 10: Cooper, ch.9-10
  • Week 11: J.P. Sartre, Existentialism as a Humanism (Yale UP, 2007)
  • Week 12: Sartre, "Nausea" (Penguin, 1965)
  • Week 13: Samuel Beckett, "Waiting for Godot"; "Endgame" (Faber&Faber, 2012)

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Demonstrate understanding of Existentialism as a historical movement and a philosophical approach to questions regarding life, morality, history and human experience.
  • LO2. Explain how philosophers from the late 19th and 20th century have contributed to Existentialist thought.
  • LO3. Explore Existential questions regarding self-constitution and the shaping of interpersonal relationships.
  • LO4. Analyse ideas and philosophical arguments encountered in historical texts.
  • LO5. Demonstrate understanding of ideas within their context and of the history and development of ideas.
  • LO6. Critically evaluate scholarship in existentialism.
  • LO7. Articulate ideas with clarity of expression and exposition.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This is the first time this unit has been offered in its current form.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.