Assessment components:

Individual Quiz 1: This is a multiple choice and short answer type quiz held in your workshop using pen and paper, covering topics from weeks 1 - 6 inclusive. Duration is for 1 hour.

Individual Quiz 2: Taking the same format of quiz 1, quiz 2 will cover topics from weeks 6-12 inclusive. Duration is for 1.5 hours.

Participation: Participation is required and highly encouraged during the workshops and online via Canvas activities where applicable. This comes in the form of taking initiatives such as answering and asking questions, leading your group work, being involved in workshop activities and so on. Remember that attendance is not participation.

Group Task 1: Introduction Presentation: This is your first presentation, where you will formally introduce your team, and the choice of organisation you wish to propose a project for.

Group Task 2: Final Report: As you progress along each week of semester, utilise the various learnings (e.g. PM frameworks, governance models, etc.) to build into your final report, which will also guide your final presentation.

Group Task 3: Final Group Presentation: In this final presentation, you will provide analysis of the organisation/company's problem area(s) chosen, and your proposed project, along with PM frameworks, governance models, and risk management aspects that are adaptable to the organisation.

Study Commitment:

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Text-matching software for Assignment Submission:

As part of the assessment process, text matching software such as Turnitin will be used to identify plagiarism and/or be used for providing feedback.

Confidential Peer Evaluation:

As part of the group contribution assessment process, collaborative & self-peer evaluation tools (e.g. SparkPlus, CATME, etc.) may be used, either on a confidential or non-confidential basis, to understand contributions and interactions amongst group members. Marks may be adjusted for an individual team member, following on from the peer evaluation process.

Mark Moderation:

Mark moderation: There may be statistically defensible moderation when combining the marks from each component to ensure consistency of marking between markers, and alignment of final grades with unit outcomes.