Unit outline_

SIEN3107: Business Negotiations

Semester 2, 2025 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

The purpose of this unit is to build students' understanding of the theory of negotiation as it is practised in a variety of strategic settings. The aim is to build students' confidence with the negotiation process. The unit is relevant to the broad spectrum of negotiation problems that are faced by managers and specific examples from international strategy such as M and A and joint ventures are used. The unit provides participants with an opportunity to develop skills experientially and to understand negotiation in useful analytic frameworks. Considerable emphasis is placed on role-playing exercises and case studies. This unit requires participation in a number of negotiations. Preparation for these negotiations, which are a large part of the final grade, requires time-pressured reading of material in class.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Strategy, Innovation and Entrepreneurship
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
Completion of at least 48 credit points
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
IBUS3107
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Adrian Harms, adrian.harms@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Adrian Harms, adrian.harms@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 1 September 2025
Type Description Weight Due Length Use of AI
Written work Individual assignment
Submitted paper
25% Formal exam period
Due date: 17 Nov 2025 at 23:59

Closing date: 27 Nov 2025
1000 words + references & appendices AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
In-person practical, skills, or performance task or test In-class exercises
Negotiation assessments
50% Multiple weeks
Closing date: 05 Nov 2025
Varies weekly AI prohibited
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Presentation group assignment Team presentation
Live presentation & submitted synopsis
25% Week 12 10 minutes + 1000 words AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

  • In-class exercises: The in-class negotiations will require you to read, prepare, and negotiate cases with other students in the class. The cases are proprietary and are generally based on real-world scenarios. Throughout the semester, you will be given the opportunity to negotiate in different roles. In addition to negotiations, there may be other related activites such as quizzes. These in-class exercises are marked based on performance and outcome.
  • Team presentation: The group presentation is a team research assignment of a negotiation or decision making issue from either your industry/business, the news, or a historical source. Your team will use relatively few concepts from the course to explain and/or provide a solution to the issue. Academic research and analysis will be required to draft a synopsis and to present your team’s findings during class.
  • Individual assignment: The written assignment will test your mastery of the key content areas of this course including negotiations and the decision making that underlies it. Your task is to either draw on your negotiation and decision making skills including how you will use “nudges” or “bias busters” to improve yourself, or to use your learnings from the course to improve the negotiations and decision making of others, including non-profit organisations, governments or business.

Detailed information for each assessment will be provided in-class and on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at an exceptional standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school. 

Distinction

75 - 84

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at a very high standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school.

Credit

65 - 74

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at a good standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school.

Pass

50 - 64

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at an acceptable standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school. 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI)

You can use generative AI tools for open assessments. Restrictions on AI use apply to secure, supervised assessments used to confirm if students have met specific learning outcomes.

Refer to the assessment table above to see if AI is allowed, for assessments in this unit and check Canvas for full instructions on assessment tasks and AI use.

If you use AI, you must always acknowledge it. Misusing AI may lead to a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The University expects students to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

Our website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. This includes advice on how to avoid common breaches of academic integrity. Ensure that you have completed the Academic Honesty Education Module (AHEM) which is mandatory for all commencing coursework students

Penalties for serious breaches can significantly impact your studies and your career after graduation. It is important that you speak with your unit coordinator if you need help with completing assessments.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Negotiation Dynamics Block teaching (3 hr)  
Week 02 Preparation for Negotiation Block teaching (3 hr)  
Week 03 Evaluation Techniques Block teaching (3 hr)  
Week 04 Social Psychology of Influence Block teaching (3 hr)  
Week 05 Biases, Heuristics, Effects, and Errors Block teaching (3 hr)  
Week 06 Group Dynamics Block teaching (3 hr)  
Week 07 Logic and Creativity Block teaching (3 hr)  
Week 08 Parachutes, Problems, and Tricks Block teaching (3 hr)  
Week 09 Culture, Human Nature, Emotion, and Individual Difference Block teaching (3 hr)  
Week 10 Enforcement Mechanisms Block teaching (3 hr)  
Week 11 Ethics, Lying, and the Law Block teaching (3 hr)  
Week 12 Alternative Dispute Resolution Block teaching (3 hr)  
Week 13 Conflict Block teaching (3 hr)  

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Required textbook:

  • Rares, Quintin (2012) “Negotiation: Science and Practice”.

Optional books:

  • Kahneman, Daniel (2011) "Thinking, Fast and Slow".
  • Thaler, R & Sunstein, C (2021) “Nudge: The Final Edition”.
  • Cialdini, Robert (2021) "Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion"

Assigned articles:

  • Required or recommended articles may be assigned throughout the duration of the unit.

 

Readings for each week will be provided in-class and on Canvas.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Apply the underlying theories, concepts, assumptions and arguments to better your negotiation strategy and result.
  • LO2. Conceptualise the links between strategic, tactical, and operational perspectives in problem solving and decision making.
  • LO3. Analyse the central concepts in negotiation and use this knowledge to systematically understand and evaluate the negotiation process.
  • LO4. Evaluate realistic international business simulations, including the costs and benefits of alternative strategies, and apply these strategies.
  • LO5. Identify systematic biases in the judgment of decision makers, and relate this to your own behaviour in negotiating with the view to improving negotiation practice.
  • LO6. Understand the way in which emotions, relationships, and the perceptions of fairness affect negotiation and consider the broader ethical implications of various negotiation tactics.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

No major changes have been made since this unit was last offered.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.