Skip to main content
Unit of study_

SLSS2606: Socio-Legal Theory

Semester 2, 2020 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This core unit explores theoretical approaches to studying socio-legal dynamics in a globalised society. It examines key theoretical debates drawing on classical theorists (Weber, Durkheim, Marx), more recent social theorists (Habermas, Foucault, Bourdieu) and critical notes from gender, queer, race, postcolonial, and science studies.

Unit details and rules

Unit code SLSS2606
Academic unit
Credit points 6
Prohibitions
? 
SCLG2615
Prerequisites
? 
12 credit points at 1000 level in Socio-Legal Studies
Corequisites
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Natalia Maystorovich, natalie.maystorovich@sydney.edu.au
Tutor(s) Tristan Bradshaw, tristan.bradshaw@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Presentation group assignment Presentation
Oral presentation
10% - 500 words, 10 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO4 LO5
Participation Participation
n/a
10% Ongoing n/a
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4
Assignment Research Essay
Essay
35% Week 06 1500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5
Assignment Case Study Essay
Case study
35% Week 12 1500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5
Small continuous assessment Discussion Board
Weekly Discussion Board
10% Weekly 1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

  • Participation: A mark out of 10 is awarded for your semester-long contribution to the class discussion and activities, including your ability to demonstrate that your participation is informed by required readings and other preparation. This mark recognises your contribution in small group work as well as large group discussions. The mark recognises different learning and communication styles. Sharing your thoughts, insights (and confusion) and working through ideas with others is what is most valuable for learning, and therefore most valued when it comes to marks.
  • Presentation: In groups of about 4 you will make a presentation. These are intended to more closely resemble tutorial facilitations than presentations, with the aim to stimulate thinking about the week’s topic.
  • Case Study:  You will be required to link one of the theorists covered in the unit (Durkheim, Selznick, Marx, Weber, Habermas) and to link it to a contemporary case of your choice. The case study should use at least two scholarly readings (one from the required list and the other from the recommended list or from the library). You are also free to use external media resources (newspaper, film, art).
  • Research essay: The research essay should use at least five scholarly readings (three from the required list and two from either the recommended list or from the library). You are also free to use external media resources (newspaper, film, art). Your essay must utilise one of the accepted systems for citation (footnotes, or author/date). 

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas. 

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction – why socio-legal theory? Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 02 Moral community and law Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 03 Ideology and rationalisation Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 04 The Frankfurt School Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 05 The power of language Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 06 The "legal field" Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 07 Power and identity Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 08 Feminist and queer legal theory Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 09 Race and postcolonial theories of law Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 10 Topical excursus: law in science and technology Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 11 Topical excursus: law in globalisation Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 12 Concluding lecture Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: According to Faculty Board Resolutions, students in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences are expected to attend 90% of their classes. If you attend less than 50% of classes, regardless of the reasons, you may be referred to the Examiner’s Board. The Examiner’s Board will decide whether you should pass or fail the unit of study if your attendance falls below this threshold.
  • Lecture recording: Most lectures (in recording-equipped venues) will be recorded and may be made available to students on the LMS. However, you should not rely on lecture recording to substitute your classroom learning experience.
  • Preparation: Students should commit to spend approximately three hours’ preparation time (reading, studying, homework, essays, etc.) for every hour of scheduled instruction.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. demonstrate an advanced understanding of sociological theories in the study of law and society
  • LO2. demonstrate the critical capacity to relate socio-legal theory to appropriate methods and techniques
  • LO3. assimilate, organise and criticise a corpus of academic materials
  • LO4. organise, critically analyse and relate to substantive and theoretical concerns within a body of empirical material and data
  • LO5. display strong personal and intellectual autonomy, and interpersonal and communicative skills.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

No changes have been made since this unit was last offered

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.