Unit outline_

CSCD1041: EBP in Speech Pathology

Semester 1, 2026 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

Students learn how to seek best evidence, and summarise research papers and literature reviews. Students will develop digital literacy competencies and will apply these skills to their academic and professional practice, developing their critical thinking, and professional due diligence.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Communication Sciences
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
CSCD3085 or CSCD4051
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Rebecca Sutherland, rebecca.sutherland@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 31 March 2026
Type Description Weight Due Length Use of AI
In-person practical, skills, or performance task or test Early Feedback Task Early Feedback Task
Early feedback task - in class quiz.
5% Week 03
Due date: 10 Mar 2026 at 08:00

Closing date: 30 Mar 2026
15 minutes AI prohibited
Outcomes assessed: LO4 LO5
Case studies Assignment 1 - summary of a research article
Analyse and summarise one journal article
25% Week 04
Due date: 20 Mar 2026 at 23:00

Closing date: 30 Apr 2026
750 words AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO3 LO4
Written work Summary and critique of research articles
Sumary and critique of journal articles, using templates and excel software
35% Week 08
Due date: 24 Apr 2026 at 23:00
1500 words AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Presentation group assignment Group oral presentation
Group presentation regarding evidence based practice
35% Week 13
Due date: 29 May 2026 at 23:00
10 minutes AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
group assignment = group assignment ?
early feedback task = early feedback task ?

Early feedback task

This unit includes an early feedback task, designed to give you feedback prior to the census date for this unit. Details are provided in the Canvas site and your result will be recorded in your Marks page. It is important that you actively engage with this task so that the University can support you to be successful in this unit.

Assessment summary

Early feedback task (Quiz) 5%

Assignment 1 (Journal article summary) 25%

Assignment 2 (Summary and critique of 5 articles) 35%

Group presentation 35%

Assessment criteria

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

The learning outcomes of the unit of study have not been met to a satisfactory standard. 

For more information see guide to grades.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI)

You can use generative AI tools for open assessments. Restrictions on AI use apply to secure, supervised assessments used to confirm if students have met specific learning outcomes.

Refer to the assessment table above to see if AI is allowed, for assessments in this unit and check Canvas for full instructions on assessment tasks and AI use.

If you use AI, you must always acknowledge it. Misusing AI may lead to a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

5% of available marks per day late. Work submitted more than 10 calendar days late will receive a mark of zero. Contact the UoS coordinator regarding any concerns.

Academic integrity

The University expects students to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

Our website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. This includes advice on how to avoid common breaches of academic integrity. Ensure that you have completed the Academic Honesty Education Module (AHEM) which is mandatory for all commencing coursework students

Penalties for serious breaches can significantly impact your studies and your career after graduation. It is important that you speak with your unit coordinator if you need help with completing assessments.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction to EBP Lecture (2 hr) LO4 LO5 LO6
Introduction to EBP Tutorial (1 hr) LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 02 What is evidence? Lecture (2 hr) LO3 LO4
What is evidence? Tutorial (1 hr) LO3 LO4
Week 03 How do I make sense of journal articles? Lecture (2 hr) LO2 LO3
How do I make sense of journal articles? Tutorial (1 hr) LO2 LO3
Week 04 Journal articles: qual, quant and review Lecture (2 hr) LO2
Journal articles: qual, quant and review Tutorial (1 hr) LO2
Week 05 Where do I find evidence? Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO3
Where do I find evidence? Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO3
Week 06 Searching for evidence Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO3
Searching for evidence Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO3
Week 07 Is all evidence created equal? Lecture (2 hr) LO2 LO4 LO6
Is all evidence created equal? Tutorial (1 hr) LO2 LO4 LO6
Week 08 Quality evaluations of evidence Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO6
Quality evaluations of evidence Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO6
Week 09 Acknolwledging research evidence Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO6
Acknowledging research evidence Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO6
Week 10 What about the other parts of the diamond? Lecture (2 hr) LO4 LO5 LO6
What about the other parts of the diamond? Tutorial (1 hr) LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 11 Communicating about evidence Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5 LO6
Communicating about evidence Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 12 Hot topics Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Hot topics Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 13 Wrap up Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Wrap up Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6

Attendance and class requirements

Students are strongly encouraged to attend lectures and tutorials. Tutorials are not recorded and will be used to support assessment task completion. 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Readings will be available each week on the relevant Canvas page 

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Identify and access relevant research evidence using proprietary tools such as academic databases reference management software and artificial intelligence software, supporting academic tasks and early professional practice.
  • LO2. Understand the purpose and structure of a literature review, demonstrating the ability to summarise key findings from research papers relevant to speech pathology practice.
  • LO3. Develop foundational digital literacy skills by using proprietary tools such for data entry, management, and interpretation in relation to speech pathology research and practice.
  • LO4. Apply critical thinking skills to evaluate evidence, recognising the importance quality and context of evidence in clinical decision-making
  • LO5. Understand the principles of evidence-based practice (EBP) and understand its role in speech pathology, focusing on the relationship between research, clinical expertise, client values, and contextual environments.
  • LO6. Demonstrate professional responsibility by using research evidence appropriately in discussions and assignments, acknowledging sources and applying ethical principles in academic work

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

Alignment with Competency standards

Outcomes Competency standards
LO1
Speech Pathology Australia Professional Standards (2021) - SPA
1.1.b. We exercise informed ethical judgement consistent with the Speech Pathology Australia Code of Ethics.
2.5.a. We acquire, critique and integrate knowledge from different sources to develop and inform our practice, including • contemporary theory • research, practice, evidence, outcomes, knowledges and experiences of individuals and their supports, and community members, leaders and Elders • speech pathology colleagues and colleagues from other disciplines • cultural, ethical, legal, policy and organisational knowledge and requirements.
LO2
Speech Pathology Australia Professional Standards (2021) - SPA
2.5.a. We acquire, critique and integrate knowledge from different sources to develop and inform our practice, including • contemporary theory • research, practice, evidence, outcomes, knowledges and experiences of individuals and their supports, and community members, leaders and Elders • speech pathology colleagues and colleagues from other disciplines • cultural, ethical, legal, policy and organisational knowledge and requirements.
2.5.b. We recognise limitations in the speech pathology evidence base relevant to our areas of practice.
2.6.a. We participate in reciprocal learning with our speech pathology colleagues, colleagues from other disciplines, students, service users, their families and social networks, and community members, leaders and Elders.
2.7. Contribute to the speech pathology evidence base
LO3
Speech Pathology Australia Professional Standards (2021) - SPA
1.2.b. We adhere to Speech Pathology Australia standards, policies and practice guidelines.
2.5.a. We acquire, critique and integrate knowledge from different sources to develop and inform our practice, including • contemporary theory • research, practice, evidence, outcomes, knowledges and experiences of individuals and their supports, and community members, leaders and Elders • speech pathology colleagues and colleagues from other disciplines • cultural, ethical, legal, policy and organisational knowledge and requirements.
LO4
Speech Pathology Australia Professional Standards (2021) - SPA
1.1.b. We exercise informed ethical judgement consistent with the Speech Pathology Australia Code of Ethics.
1.2.b. We adhere to Speech Pathology Australia standards, policies and practice guidelines.
2.5.a. We acquire, critique and integrate knowledge from different sources to develop and inform our practice, including • contemporary theory • research, practice, evidence, outcomes, knowledges and experiences of individuals and their supports, and community members, leaders and Elders • speech pathology colleagues and colleagues from other disciplines • cultural, ethical, legal, policy and organisational knowledge and requirements.
2.6.a. We participate in reciprocal learning with our speech pathology colleagues, colleagues from other disciplines, students, service users, their families and social networks, and community members, leaders and Elders.
2.7. Contribute to the speech pathology evidence base
LO5
Speech Pathology Australia Professional Standards (2021) - SPA
2.5.a. We acquire, critique and integrate knowledge from different sources to develop and inform our practice, including • contemporary theory • research, practice, evidence, outcomes, knowledges and experiences of individuals and their supports, and community members, leaders and Elders • speech pathology colleagues and colleagues from other disciplines • cultural, ethical, legal, policy and organisational knowledge and requirements.
2.5.b. We recognise limitations in the speech pathology evidence base relevant to our areas of practice.
LO6
Speech Pathology Australia Professional Standards (2021) - SPA
1.1.b. We exercise informed ethical judgement consistent with the Speech Pathology Australia Code of Ethics.
1.2.b. We adhere to Speech Pathology Australia standards, policies and practice guidelines.
Speech Pathology Australia Professional Standards (2021) -
Competency code Taught, Practiced or Assessed Competency standard
1.2.b T We adhere to Speech Pathology Australia standards, policies and practice guidelines.
2.5.a T We acquire, critique and integrate knowledge from different sources to develop and inform our practice, including • contemporary theory • research, practice, evidence, outcomes, knowledges and experiences of individuals and their supports, and community members, leaders and Elders • speech pathology colleagues and colleagues from other disciplines • cultural, ethical, legal, policy and organisational knowledge and requirements.
2.5.b T We recognise limitations in the speech pathology evidence base relevant to our areas of practice.
2.6.a T We participate in reciprocal learning with our speech pathology colleagues, colleagues from other disciplines, students, service users, their families and social networks, and community members, leaders and Elders.
2.7 T Contribute to the speech pathology evidence base

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

NA - first presentation of content

Disclaimer

Important: the University of Sydney regularly reviews units of study and reserves the right to change the units of study available annually. To stay up to date on available study options, including unit of study details and availability, refer to the relevant handbook.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.