Unit outline_

LAWS6219: International Criminal Law

Semester 2, 2026 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

International criminal law concerns the prosecution of individuals, mostly military and political leaders, for genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and aggression. After being first enforced in the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals after World War II, international criminal law has experienced a resurgence in the past twenty-five years. Today, trials under international criminal law are underway at the International Criminal Court, the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, and the mechanism that is finishing cases that began in the international criminal tribunals for Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia. This unit provides a foundational knowledge of the principles of international criminal law, with reference to both historic and ongoing trials. Students will consider the roles of investigators, prosecutors, victims, lawyers, defence, judges, and States in international criminal justice, and will consider controversies and challenges facing international criminal courts and tribunals today. The elements of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, modes of liability and defences will be covered, with case studies on sexual violence crimes and the use of child soldiers. The unit also considers the interaction between the International Criminal Court, national governments, and the United Nations Security Council. Refer to Sydney Law School timetable - https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/4533/pages/postgraduate-lecture-timetable

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
LAWS6896
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Rosemary Grey, rosemary.grey@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Rosemary Grey, rosemary.grey@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 31 August 2026
Type Description Weight Due Length Use of AI
Written exam Final exam (60%)
Exam consisting of Problem question. i.e. applying rules to factual scenario.
60% Formal exam period 2 hours AI prohibited
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5
Interactive oral (Alternative) Capstone Presentation (0%)
Discussion in-person
0% Formal exam period
Due date: 16 Nov 2026 at 10:00
15-20 minute AI limited - refer to Canvas
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Written work (Alternative) Capstone Essay (60%)
Written work
0% Formal exam period
Due date: 09 Nov 2026 at 23:59

Closing date: 23 Nov 2026
7000 words / 9 weeks AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Contribution ‘On call’ contributions (20%)
“On call” for two assigned readings.
20% Ongoing 5-10 minutes during class time AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO3 LO1
Out-of-class quiz Early Feedback Task Early Feedback task (0%)
Online quiz
0% Week 03
Due date: 20 Aug 2026 at 23:59
Multiple-choice questions AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1
Written test In-semester test (20%)
Multiple choice & short answer test.
20% Week 07
Due date: 15 Sep 2026 at 12:00
1 hour AI prohibited
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5
early feedback task = early feedback task ?

Assessment summary

Early Feedback Task (0%): This unit includes an Early Feedback Task that is designed to provide students with timely insights into their understanding and engagement with the unit content. The Early Feedback Task in this unit is a multiple choice questions. The task will be available on Canvas from 9.00am on Monday 17 August 2026 and due at 11:59pm on 20 August 2026, (Sydney, Australia time). Students will be provided with immediate automated feedback upon completion of the task. 

In-semester test (20%) Students will complete a secure in-semester test comprising multiple-choice and short-answer questions on topics from Weeks 1 to 6. Students may bring up to 10 pages of typed notes, but no devices are permitted. There is no word count; the test duration is 1 hour writing time plus 15 minutes reading time. Instructions and timing details will be released on Canvas. This assessment evaluates students’ ability to identify and explain relevant legal rules, interpret primary legal materials, and apply legal reasoning to factual problems in international criminal law. This task addresses the learning outcomes concerned with legal knowledge, source analysis, written communication, legal problem-solving, and critical evaluation The test will be held on 15 September 2026 at 12.00pm (Sydney, Australia time) in Week 7. 

‘On-call’ contributions (20%) Students will act as the designated “on-call” person for two assigned readings and answer 2 to 3 comprehension questions in class on each reading. There are 10 marks available for each reading, for a total of 20 marks, with the final grade calculated as X/10 + Y/10. There is no word count; each contribution will take approximately 5 to 10 minutes during class time. Reading allocations and instructions will be released on Canvas. This assessment evaluates students’ preparation, oral communication, and ability to identify, explain, and engage with key legal principles and arguments arising from the unit readings. Contributions are due at each student’s allocated seminar times across the semester, with specific dates and times to be advised on Canvas. This task addresses the learning outcomes concerned with foundational legal knowledge, analysis of legal materials, and accurate oral communication.

Final exam (60%) Students will complete a secure, supervised, in-person exam consisting of one problem question, which may draw on any topic covered in the unit. Students will be assessed on their ability to explain relevant legal rules by reference to authority and apply those rules to the facts in a clear and reasoned way. This task addresses the learning outcomes concerned with legal knowledge, source analysis, written communication, legal problem-solving, and critical evaluation. Printed materials are permitted, but no devices are allowed. There is no word count; the exam duration is 2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading time. The exam will be held during the formal Semester 2 examination period in November 2026, with the specific date and time to be advised by the Exams Office (Sydney, Australia time). https://www.sydney.edu.au/students/exams/timetables.html.

(Alternative) Capstone Essay (60%) As an alternative to the final exam, students may elect to complete an open Capstone Essay. Students will produce a sustained, research-informed written analysis in international criminal law. The word count is 7,000 words, including footnotes and headings. The essay question will be released in Week 7 on Tuesday 15 September 2026, (Sydney, Australia time). Students who choose this option must email the unit coordinator before class in Week 11, Tuesday 20 October 2026, to indicate how they intend to personalise the question. This assessment evaluates students’ ability to synthesise legal sources, conduct advanced legal analysis, construct a persuasive argument, and communicate complex ideas in writing. The essay is due on Monday 9 November 2026 at 11:59pm (Sydney, Australia time). This task addresses the learning outcomes concerned with legal knowledge, source analysis, advanced written communication, legal reasoning, and critical evaluation.

(Alternative) Capstone Presentation (0%) Students who elect the Capstone Essay pathway must also complete a 15 to 20 minute in-person pre-viva oral task. Students will respond to questions from the lecturer and defend their argument in a rigorous academic discussion. No notes or devices are permitted, and the discussion will be audio-recorded for verification purposes. Scheduling information and instructions will be released on Canvas. This assessment evaluates students’ critical thinking, oral articulation of legal arguments, ability to justify research findings, and capacity to explain their research process, including any permitted use of AI. The task will be held in the week commencing Monday 16 November 2026,  This task supports the learning outcomes concerned with oral communication, legal reasoning, and critical evaluation, and it also serves an academic integrity function within the alternative assessment pathway.

Word limit penalty: A piece of assessment which exceeds the prescribed word limit will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment for every 100 words, or part thereof. The total word count for essay and other written assessments will include all footnotes and any bibliography (if required), and exclude acknowledgements of assistance from editors, automated writing tools or generative AI (where use is permitted). 

Referencing: The Sydney Law School expects you to use the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018) for your footnoting style, although you should confirm this with your lecturer. A link to the library website where this is set out comprehensively is available at Referencing and Citation Styles: AGLC4. 

Special consideration: Successful grants of Special Consideration may involve alternative tasks, as appropriate.  

Assessment requirements to pass a unit of study: A student must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks set out in this Unit of Study in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of Study. As the EFT is an early diagnostic tool, this task is not included in the final grade for the unit.  

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2021 (Schedule 1). 

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

• Completely answers the question.
• Contains striking originality of approach or analysis.
• Demonstrates exhaustive or innovative research (where independent research
required).
• Exceptionally well written, structured and expressed.
• Is otherwise exceptional in some way.

Distinction

75 - 84

• Completely answers the question.
• Achieves a critical and evaluative approach to the issues.
• Content and structure is well organised in support of the argument.
• Demonstrates extensive research and analysis to support a well-documented
argument.
• Generally well expressed and free from errors.
• Has a clear structure and is well articulated.

Credit

65 - 74

• Covers main issues fairly well in answering the question.
• Contains no significant errors
• Demonstrates an attempted critical approach to the issues.
• Demonstrates reasonably sound research and analysis in addressing the key issues.
• Has a clear structure and reasonably clear expression.

Pass

50 - 64

• Identifies the key issues, but does not follow through with a reasoned argument.
• Contains some significant errors.
• Displays satisfactory engagement with the key issues.
• Offers descriptive summary of material relevant to the question.
• Superficial use of material, and may display a tendency to paraphrase.
• Demonstrates little evidence of in-depth research or analysis.
• Adequate expression.
• Overall, demonstrates the minimum level of competence in the assessment and
satisfies the requirements to proceed to higher-level studies in the degree or subject
area.

Fail

0 - 49

• Does not answer the question.
• Contains significant or numerous errors.
• Few or no identifiable arguments.
• Content that is inappropriate or irrelevant.
• Lack of research or analysis.
• Difficult or impossible to understand through poor grammar, expression or
structure.
• Overall, does not demonstrate the minimum level of competence in the
assessment.

For more information see guide to grades.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI)

You can use generative AI tools for open assessments. Restrictions on AI use apply to secure, supervised assessments used to confirm if students have met specific learning outcomes.

Refer to the assessment table above to see if AI is allowed, for assessments in this unit and check Canvas for full instructions on assessment tasks and AI use.

If you use AI, you must always acknowledge it. Misusing AI may lead to a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The late submission of a piece of assessment, without an approved extension, will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment per 24 hours or part thereof, after the due time on the due date. Penalties for late submission will be applied strictly, subject to a 5 minute grace period. Late penalties do not apply to exams and tests.

Academic integrity

The University expects students to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

Our website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. This includes advice on how to avoid common breaches of academic integrity. Ensure that you have completed the Academic Honesty Education Module (AHEM) which is mandatory for all commencing coursework students

Penalties for serious breaches can significantly impact your studies and your career after graduation. It is important that you speak with your unit coordinator if you need help with completing assessments.

Visit the Current Students website for more information on AI in assessments, including details on how to acknowledge its use.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction to International Criminal Law Self-directed learning (2 hr) LO4 LO5 LO3 LO1 LO2
Week 02 The International Criminal Court Seminar (2 hr) LO4 LO5 LO3 LO1 LO2
Week 03 War Crimes Seminar (2 hr) LO4 LO5 LO3 LO1 LO2
Week 04 Crimes against Humanity Seminar (2 hr) LO4 LO5 LO3 LO1 LO2
Week 05 Genocide Seminar (2 hr) LO4 LO5 LO3 LO1 LO2
Week 06 Aggression Seminar (2 hr) LO4 LO5 LO3 LO1 LO2
Week 07 Modes of liability Seminar (2 hr) LO4 LO5 LO3 LO1 LO2
Week 08 Defences Seminar (2 hr) LO4 LO5 LO3 LO1 LO2
Week 09 Treaty making & interpretation Seminar (2 hr) LO4 LO5 LO3 LO1 LO2
Week 10 Evidence Seminar (2 hr) LO4 LO5 LO3 LO1 LO2
Week 11 State Co-Operation Seminar (2 hr) LO4 LO5 LO3 LO1 LO2
Week 12 Reforming international criminal law Seminar (2 hr) LO4 LO5 LO3 LO1 LO2
Week 13 Case study and Completion of the student feedback survey for this unit of study. Seminar (2 hr) LO4 LO5 LO3 LO1 LO2

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: All students are required to attend 70% of classes to satisfy the pass requirements for this unit. Failure to meet this requirement will result in an Absent Fail grade being recorded as the student’s result for this unit (see The University of Sydney Law School Resolutions: Coursework Awards cl 11).  

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Textbook:

Darryl Robinson, Valerie Oosterveld, Sergey Vasiliev, Elies van Sliedregt (eds), An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure (Cambridge University Press 2024).

Full reading list available on Canvas.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Analyse and apply the rules, principles and institutional frameworks of international criminal law to historical and contemporary prosecutions involving genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and aggression.
  • LO2. Apply relevant legal research methodologies to the critically analysis of primary sources to identify, interpret and evaluate key principles, findings and arguments in international criminal law.
  • LO3. Communicate accurate, logically structured and persuasive analyses of complex international criminal law issues to specialist and non-specialist audiences.
  • LO4. Formulate reasoned legal advice on complex problems in international criminal law by identifying material facts and issues, applying relevant rules and tests, and justifying legally supported conclusions.
  • LO5. Critically evaluate the effectiveness, legitimacy and limitations of international criminal law institutions, doctrines and practices and construct reasoned arguments for reform.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Assessment régime have been changed

Work, health and safety

This unit contains reference to violent material including sexual crimes. 

Disclaimer

Important: the University of Sydney regularly reviews units of study and reserves the right to change the units of study available annually. To stay up to date on available study options, including unit of study details and availability, refer to the relevant handbook.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.