A survey of 600 Western Australians has found 75 percent of respondents support the West Australian government selecting non-lethal responses following shark bite incidents.
Political responses that support culls, and hunts, are out of touch with the majority of public sentiment.
A survey of 600 Western Australians has found 75 percent of respondents support the West Australian government selecting non-lethal responses following shark bite incidents.
The University of Sydney survey was conducted in the Perth region including the locations of Mandurah and Mindarie, sites of recent fatal shark bite incidents. The West coast of Australia has had the highest number of shark bite deaths in the world over the last six years.
The breakdown of 75 percent support for non-lethal policy options is:
Support for lethal options totaled 22 percent:
The University of Sydney research was undertaken by Dr Christopher Neff, a lecturer in public policy and Dr Tom Wynter.
It has included conducting the same survey in Ballina with 700 people in September, 2015 following its spate of serious and fatal shark bites. This earlier survey found that 83 percent of respondents supported non-lethal government responses.
Dr Neff said, “The remarkable thing about the Western Australian results is that after 10 tragic and fatal shark bite incidents since 2010 the public would still prefer the West Australian government to adopt non-lethal policy responses. This should give the government pause.”
In addition the West Australian results showed:
Dr Neff added, “It is worth noting that even after two shark bite fatalities occurred in the same week in Western Australia a majority of locals believe no one is to blame and that these shark bites are accidents.”
“My job is to follow the evidence and the data, not to pick sides. This latest survey and that in Ballina, together with those I’ve done in Sydney (563 participants), and Cape Town (200 participants) over the past four years, have created the largest data set of community reactions to shark bites anywhere in the world.”
“Media reports and government officials often suggest killing sharks is a popular option but that perception is inconsistent with these research findings,” said Dr Neff.
“Political responses that support culls, and hunts, are out of touch with the majority of public sentiment.”
The research included 400 responses from the federal seat of Perth and 100 responses from each of the two locations in Mundurah and Mindarie.
The study’s overall cost was approximately $15,000. It was partially funded with a $10,000 grant from the Save Our Seas Foundation.
The government faces some thorny legal questions as the fight against Islamic State draws our troops towards Syria, writes Malcolm Jorgensen.
Concerns remain about the citizenship-stripping bill's inattention to human rights, its differential impact upon dual and sole nationals, and its potential application to persons who commit relatively minor crimes, explains Professor Helen Irving.
Treasurer highlights fundamental questions about how we think economies behave and the role of government, writes Associate Professor Graham White.