New report reveals insights into clinical trials in Australia

20 December 2017
A new report reveals Australia ranks in the top tier of national clinical trial activity with more than 10,000 clinical trials conducted between 2006-2015, with cancer the most frequently studied health issue.

A new report by the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, housed in NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre at the University of Sydney reveals interesting insights into clinical trials in Australia, where more than $1 billion is invested each year by both government and industry.

Published today, the report represents one of the most comprehensive assessments of clinical trial activity in Australia ever undertaken. Drawing on data from 10,549 Australian clinical trials registered between 2006-2015, the report highlights important national trends in Australian clinical trial activity.

“Clinical trials are an essential part of an effective and efficient health care sector, and a vital strategy in ensuring better health for all Australians,” said Associate Professor Lisa Askie, Director of Systematic Reviews and Health Technology Assessment, at the University’s NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre.

“They ensure that the best treatments, to both prevent and treat illness, are assessed rigorously before being implemented into routine care.  

“As such, it is vital to ensure that the clinical trials we are doing in Australia meet the needs of our citizens, and that the clinical trials sector remains robust and competitive by international standards.

“By conducting clinical trials in this country we enable Australians to access the best available health care options by capitalising on effective and efficient therapies, reducing research waste and maximising value for money from the health care dollars invested.”

Key findings of the report:

  • A total of 5.2 million people have participated in Australian clinical trials registered over the 10 years 2006–2015, with more than 10,000 clinical trials conducted.
  • Cancer has been the most frequently studied health issue in Australian clinical trials registered between 2006 and 2015 at 18 per cent, followed by mental health (10 per cent), and cardiovascular conditions (12 per cent).
  • Trial activity in mental health has grown steadily since 2006, and trials registered each year in this area have outnumbered trials for all other health conditions, except cancer, since 2010.
  • Measured against the relative ‘burden of disease’ represented by the top National Health Priority Area conditions, cardiovascular disease has seen fewer trials than would be expected but significantly more participants. For mental health, the number of trials is close to what would be expected, but the total number of trial participants is lower.
  • Some areas of high disease burden, such as dementia and obesity, remain under-represented.
  • Australia ranks towards the middle of comparable nations in terms of clinical trial activity on a per capita basis, above Canada and Ireland, for example, and below Sweden and New Zealand.
  • Just under half (45 per cent) of the Australian clinical trials registered over the decade have some kind of industry involvement, either as a funding source, primary sponsor, secondary sponsor or other collaborator.
  • Clinical trials in Australia assess multiple types of interventions, including drug treatments (47 per cent), surgery (4 per cent), medical devices (10 per cent), behavioural therapies (10 per cent) and prevention strategies (11 per cent). The range of activity includes large, multicentre, phase 3 trials likely to have an impact on clinical practice directly, as well as early-phase trials testing novel therapies or interventions that may become the new best treatments of tomorrow.
  • More than $1 billion is invested in Australian clinical trials each year by both government and industry.  Despite the large price tag, clinical trials represent great value for money. For example, a recent joint report by the Australian Clinical Trials Alliance and the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care showed that in investigator-initiated trials conducted within trial networks, for every $1 invested there was a greater than $5 return on investment. Several other studies, in Australia and elsewhere, have demonstrated significant return on investment and improved health outcomes in systems with high clinical trial research participation.

“The information contained within this report will help consumers, clinicians, industry, universities and those in the health care sector to better prioritise, plan and perform clinical trials,” said Professor Askie.

“This will lead to innovation and efficiency, and will help improve the health of all Australians.

“Future investment in clinical trials is likely to continue to produce large health benefits. Prioritisation of trials should be based on factors such as disease burden or gaps in health outcomes between different populations, and include those areas with the potential to have a greater impact and return on investment.

“For example, clinical trials targeting interventions in the perinatal or early childhood period could be important in terms of lifetime benefits.”

Read the full report here.

Kobi Print

Media and PR Adviser (Health)

Related articles