Skip to main content
Unit of study_

ENGG5205: Professional Practice in Project Management

This unit of study teaches the fundamental knowledge on the importance, organisational context and professional practice in project management. It serves as an introduction to project management practices for non-PM students. For PM students, this unit lays the foundation to progress to advanced PM subjects. Although serving as a general introduction unit, the focus has been placed on scope, time, cost, and integration related issues. Specifically, the unit aims to: Introduce students to the institutional, organisational and professional environment for today's project management practitioners as well as typical challenges and issues facing them; Demonstrate the importance of project management to engineering and organisations; Demonstrate the progression from strategy formulation to execution of the project; Provide a set of tools and techniques at different stages of a project's lifecycle with emphasis on scope, time, cost and integration related issues; Highlight examples of project success/failures in project management and to take lessons from these; Consider the roles of project manager in the organization and management of people; Provide a path for students seeking improvements in their project management expertise.


Academic unit Project Management
Unit code ENGG5205
Unit name Professional Practice in Project Management
Session, year
Semester 2, 2021
Attendance mode Normal day
Location Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney
Credit points 6

Enrolment rules

Available to study abroad and exchange students


Teaching staff and contact details

Coordinator Louis Taborda,
Lecturer(s) Louis Taborda ,
Type Description Weight Due Length
Final exam (Record+) Type B final exam Final Exam
Questions require multiple-choice, written short or essay answers.
30% Formal exam period 2 hours
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Small continuous assessment group assignment Continuous Assessments
Mix of quiz, reflections, group exercises, reviews collected end semester
30% Multiple weeks In class + up to 1 hour/ wk after class
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Assignment 1 (Quiz)
Case scenario provided 2 weeks prior to online Quiz on concepts/ case study
20% Week 07
Due date: 24 Sep 2021

Closing date: 24 Sep 2021
2 hr quiz
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO2
Assignment group assignment Assignment 2
Integrated team-based report
20% Week 11
Due date: 30 Oct 2021

Closing date: 02 Nov 2021
Minimum 20 pages
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4
group assignment = group assignment ?
Type B final exam = Type B final exam ?
  • Assignment 1: short answer and multiple-choice responses to case study and content to be provided in a 3-hour online quiz. 
  • Assignment 2: written essay format assessment in the style of a business or technical report.
  • Final Exam: short answer and multiple-choice ​responses to case study and content to be provided in a 2-hour exam.
  • In-class/workshop assessments: these will include individual quizzes and short assignments, as well as group work with oral presentations as part of class activities during semester.

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range


High distinction

85 - 100



75 - 84



65 - 74



50 - 64



0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

For every calendar day up to and including ten calendar days after the due date, a penalty of 5% of the maximum awardable marks will be applied to late work. The penalty will be calculated by first marking the work, and then subtracting 5% of the maximum awardable mark for each calendar day after the due date.

Special consideration

If you experience short-term circumstances beyond your control, such as illness, injury or misadventure or if you have essential commitments which impact your preparation or performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic honesty, academic dishonesty, and the resources available to all students.

The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic dishonesty or plagiarism seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic dishonesty. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of dishonesty, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Multiple weeks Independent study guided by the online content & lectures. You are expected to undertake 8 - 10 hours per week of independent study in addition to the workshops. Independent study (100 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 01 Introduction to project management: 1. Project management history; 2. Project manager roles and responsibilities; 3. Project complexity and uncertainty; 4. Project typologies, structures and frameworks Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO7
Week 02 Strategy and Project Initiation: 1. Project justification & Business Case 2. Strategic and organisational context; 3. Strategic alignment & project selection; Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO7
Week 03 Stakeholder management: 1. Definitions of stakeholder 2. Analysing stakeholders 3. Understand the stakeholder perspectives 4. Stakeholder engagement/ comms Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5 LO7
Week 04 Scope and requirements: 1. Collecting requirements; 2. Recording requirements; 3. Requirements analysis/ traceability; Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5 LO7
Week 05 Project planning: 1. Network diagrams and their variants; 2. Scheduling/ time planning including Gantt charts; 3. Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5 LO7
Week 06 Costs & Estimates: 1. Cost management: 2. Cost estimating; 3. Cost planning Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5 LO7
Week 07 Resource management: 1. Resource estimating; 2. Resource planning; 3. Resource leveling Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5 LO7
Week 08 Risk and quality management: 1. Risk identification, analysis and response; 2. Quality control and assurance Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 09 Procurement and ethics: 1. Procurement planning and control; 2. Why does ethics matter? Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 10 Execution and governance/ monitoring 1. Work delegation; 2. Project governance; 3. Progress monitoring and reporting Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 11 Teamwork & Leadership: 1. Team collaboration; 2. Leadership styles; Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 12 Project communication and closure: 1. Project success and evaluation; 2. Project completion and handover activities Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 13 Organizational Maturity & Integrated PM Review Workshop (2 hr) LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Some weekly exercises that form a part of the Continuous Assessments mark (30%) will take the form of critical reviews of readings that will be provided.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University’s graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. understand the major roles and responsibilities of project managers and recognize the core competencies required of each role
  • LO2. define a project and apply the differences between projects or programs and “business as usual” activities in organisations and their major risks and critical success factors
  • LO3. understand and identify ethical issues facing project management professionals in projects
  • LO4. understand the project context within organisations, including project selection methods and life cycles, and the organisational constraints which affect the choice of project management methods/approaches, and how these approaches are implemented in practice
  • LO5. understand the tasks involved in scope, time and cost planning and control, and demonstrate the capacity to carry out the plan, and control project performance
  • LO6. demonstrate a broad understanding of the other requirements/components of project plans and performance monitoring, such as quality and risk management, procurement, communications and team leadership
  • LO7. understand the usefulness and limitations existing within bodies of knowledge on project management (PMBOKs) from various project management institutions, and integrate (PMBOKs) into studies and projects.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
Delivery has been adapted for blended teaching and the in-class assessments are revamped with exercises to re-cap online content and offer greater peer-to-peer engagement between students.

Study Commitment:
Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Text-matching software for Assignment Submission:
As part of the assessment process, text matching software such as Turnitin will be used to identify plagiarism and/or be used for providing feedback. 

Confidential Peer Evaluation:
As part of the group contribution assessment process, collaborative & self-peer evaluation tools (e.g. SparkPlus, CATME, etc.) may be used, either on a confidential or non-confidential basis, to understand contributions and interactions amongst group members. Marks may be adjusted for an individual team member, following on from the peer evaluation process.

Mark Moderation:
Mark moderation: There may be statistically defensible moderation when combining the marks from each component to ensure consistency of marking between markers, and alignment of final grades with unit outcomes.


The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.