Skip to main content
Unit outline_

LAWS3479: IP: Trade Marks and Patents

Semester 2, 2021 [Normal day] - Remote

This unit focuses on legal rights concerning the marketing of products, specifically, trade mark law and passing off, and legal rights concerning invention, specifically, patent law. Most aspects of the law of registered trade marks, including some references to passing-off and misleading and deceptive conduct will be covered in the unit, as will the effect of these areas of law on new marketing practices on the Internet. Some specific topics which will be covered in depth are: the differences between registered trade marks, passing-off and unfair competition; character merchandising and the protection of the celebrity persona; the nature of signs and the special problem of shape trade marks; counterfeiting and parallel imports; trade mark infringement; the badge of origin, private property and cultural resource functions of registered trade marks. In patent law, there will be a particular focus on the requirements for patentability under Australian patent law; the requirements for patent specifications; the concept of inventorship and ownership of patents; and patent infringement and defences. Although the unit of study emphasises legal doctrine and is taught from the perspective of a relatively depoliticised formalism, it is also recognised that the deployment and the regulation of intellectual property inevitably have substantial cultural and economic consequences, which in turn inform and shape the development of legal doctrine. So, for example, pharmaceutical patents are both valuable assets to their owners, who accordingly demand extensive legal protection for those assets, and also the target of vigorous criticism in the developing world for the patents' potentially detrimental effect on public health in relation to, inter alia, HIV. There will, accordingly, be some attention paid in this unit to the cultural and economic consequences of intellectual property laws, to the significance of access to the public domain and to the effects of international trade pressure in the area.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
LAWS3472 or LAWS3423 or LAWS5179
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Fady Aoun, fady.aoun@sydney.edu.au
Tutor(s) Louise Buckingham, louise.buckingham@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Optional research essay
Optional Research Essay (50%)
0% Mid-semester break
Due date: 30 Sep 2021 at 17:00
3000 words / 34 days
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Assignment Compulsory Short Release Assignment
Short-release assignment (50% or 100%)
0% Week 13
Due date: 11 Nov 2021 at 16:30

Closing date: 11 Nov 2021
3,500 words / 3.5 hours
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6

Assessment summary

Students have two options:

Option 1: 1 x 3,000 word research essay (50%) & short-release assignment (50%)

or

Option 2: Short-release assignment (100%)

Research Essay (50%):

The optional 3,000 word research essay is due 30 September 5pm AEST and is non-redeemable. It must be submitted via the Canvas assignment dropbox.

Students who wish to submit a research essay have two options: (1) they may select a research question devised by the lecturer (details provided in class and posted on Canvas by 27 August 5pm) or (2) they can elect to write a research essay on a topic they devise. For either option, students must first prepare a detailed research proposal/scaffold. The proposal should at least contain the following elements:

  1. A title of no more than 20 words which is sufficiently descriptive of the essay;
  2. A clearly defined question which the essay will attempt to address;
  3. An abstract of no more than 100 words summarising the argument of the essay;
  4. A more detailed overview of the essay’s outline, argument and methodology of no more than 500 words; and
  5. A list of cases, statutes and secondary materials you have consulted in the preparation of your proposal and which you will use in your essay.

Students may not submit an essay without prior approval of their research scaffolding/proposal along the lines set out above. Essay proposals should be submitted, by way of email to the lecturer, no later than 6 September 5pm AEST.

This assessment task assesses students’ ability to prepare a critically reasoned argument supported by relevant research material and depending on student essay choice, may enliven Learning Outcomes 1-6 inclusive. 

Short-Release Assignment (50% or 100%): 

The short-release assignment will be held on Thursday, 11 November, commencing at 1pm AEST and due for submission at 4.30pm AEST). It is worth 50% (if research essay is submitted) or 100%. It is comprised of 2 or 3 questions involving a mix of problem question(s) and may contain some short answer/essay question(s). The word limit is 3,500 words.

The duration including writing time is three (3) hours and the reading time is 30 minutes. 

By answering content-specific legal problems through appropriate legal advice (LO5), the final exam requires students to demonstrate an understanding of Australia’s system of registered trade marks, including the law of passing off and misleading and deceptive conduct and respective rationales (LO1) and/or the Australian patent system and rationale (LO2) (both situated in international trade mark and patents systems respectively) and by applying the law relating to (registered and unregistered) trade marks and associated laws (LO3, LO4) and/or patents (LO2, LO3).  In so doing, students are expected to apply the skills of case analysis and statutory interpretation (LO6) developed in the course.  

IMPORTANT NOTE: A student must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks set out in either Option 1 or Option 2 above in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of Study. Please note that successful grants of Special Consideration may involve alternative assessment tasks as appropriate.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

• Completely answers the question.
• Contains striking originality of approach or analysis.
• Demonstrates exhaustive or innovative research (where independent research
required).
• Exceptionally well written, structured and expressed.
• Is otherwise exceptional in some way.

Distinction

75 - 84

• Completely answers the question.
• Achieves a critical and evaluative approach to the issues.
• Content and structure is well organised in support of the argument.
• Demonstrates extensive research and analysis to support a well-documented
argument.
• Generally well expressed and free from errors.
• Has a clear structure and is well articulated.

Credit

65 - 74

• Covers main issues fairly well in answering the question.
• Contains no significant errors
• Demonstrates an attempted critical approach to the issues.
• Demonstrates reasonably sound research and analysis in addressing the key issues.
• Has a clear structure and reasonably clear expression.

Pass

50 - 64

• Identifies the key issues, but does not follow through with a reasoned argument.
• Contains some significant errors.
• Displays satisfactory engagement with the key issues.
• Offers descriptive summary of material relevant to the question.
• Superficial use of material, and may display a tendency to paraphrase.
• Demonstrates little evidence of in-depth research or analysis.
• Adequate expression.
• Overall, demonstrates the minimum level of competence in the assessment and
satisfies the requirements to proceed to higher-level studies in the degree or subject
area.

Fail

0 - 49

• Does not answer the question.
• Contains significant or numerous errors.
• Few or no identifiable arguments.
• Content that is inappropriate or irrelevant.
• Lack of research or analysis.
• Difficult or impossible to understand through poor grammar, expression or
structure.
• Overall, does not demonstrate the minimum level of competence in the
assessment.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

Research Essay: For the research essay, the late submission of a piece of assessment, which has not been granted an extension, will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks allocated to the piece of assessment per calendar day or part thereof. For example, if your assignment is due on Wednesday, at 5pm and you submit your paper at 5.10pm, you will be penalised 10%. Similarly, if you submit your paper on Wednesday at 11.59pm, you will be penalised 10%. However, if you submit your paper on Thursday at 12.01am, you will be penalised 20%. Short-Release Assignment: For the short-release assignment, the late submission of a piece of assessment will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks allocated to the piece of assessment per hour or part thereof. For example, if you submit your paper at 4.50 pm AEST on Thursday, 11 November, you will be penalised 10%. Similarly, if you submit your paper at 5.40 pm AEST, you will be penalised 20%. Any late submission beyond 8.00pm AEST Thursday, 11 November will not be marked.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction to & Justifications for IP; the International System; Trade Mark Theory Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Passing Off I Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 02 Passing Off II Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Introduction to the Registered Trade Marks System; Justifications; Processes Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 03 Absolute Grounds of Refusal I Seminar (2 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Absolute Grounds of Refusal II Seminar (2 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 04 Relative Grounds of Refusal I Seminar (2 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Relative Grounds of Refusal II Seminar (2 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 06 Trade Mark Infringement Seminar (2 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Loss of Trade Mark Rights and Exploitation of Trade Marks Seminar (2 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 07 Trade Mark Revision and Problem Question Based Learning Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Introduction to Patents: Registration process and the Patent Specification Seminar (2 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 09 Patentable Subject Matter – General Seminar (2 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Patentable Subject Matter - Special Topics Seminar (2 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 10 Patent criteria - the s 18 grounds I Seminar (2 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Patent criteria - the s 18 grounds II Seminar (2 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 11 Patent Criteria – the Disclosure and Claiming Requirements; Patent Ownership Seminar (2 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Patent Exploitation and Patent Strategy Seminar (2 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 12 Patent Infringement Seminar (2 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Other systems of protection Seminar (1 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Revision and past examination review Seminar (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: All students are required to attend 70% of classes (or as otherwise specified by the Unit Coordinator) to satisfy the pass requirements for each unit of study. Attendance requirements may be satisfied by in person and/or online attendance as specified by the Unit Coordinator. Failure to meet this requirement may result in a student being precluded from sitting the final assessment.

Word Count Penalty: A piece of assessment which exceeds the prescribed word limit will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks allocated to the piece of assessment for every 100 words, or part thereof, over the limit. For example, if you are 3 words over the word limit you will be penalised 10%.  If you are 101 words over the word limit, you will be penalised 20%.  The total word count for essays and other written assessments will:

  • exclude: bibliography; footnote numbers; footnote citations; cover page and
  • include: body text; headings and sub-headings; quotations; anything other than numbers and citations in footnotes.

The prescribed word limit is strict. There is no 10% leeway or any other leniency applied to word limits.

Referencing: The Sydney Law School expects you to use the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018) for your footnoting style, although you should confirm this with your lecturer, and a link to the library website where this is set out comprehensively is available at https://libguides.library.usyd.edu.au/c.php?g=508212&p=3476376

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

The prescribed textbook is:

David Price, Colin Bodkin, and Fady Aoun, Intellectual Property: Cases and Materials, ThomsonReuters, 6th ed, 2017 (PBA).

As many of the rights you will be studying are creatures of statute, you will need to acquire the relevant legislation for each section of the unit of study. The legislation is usefully collected in the Butterworths Intellectual Property Collection (produced yearly). Students may choose to obtain access to the legislation via Federal Register of Legislation (Commonwealth Law; formerly comlaw.gov.au)  www.legislation.gov.au.  or www.austlii.edu.au. Whichever option you choose, make sure you have access to current legislation during class.

You must have copies of the current legislation published in book form or download a copy published after mid 2012 – that is, the copy you have must include the revisions enacted by Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Raising the Bar) Act 2012, which had a significant impact on both the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) and the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth).

Other required reading materials will be listed in the Reading Guide which will be available on Canvas. 

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Understand the structure of the Australian registered trade mark system, and the regulation of unregistered trade marks, their economic and social rationales, and the legal institutions which support them
  • LO2. Understand the structure of the Australian patent system, its economic and social rationales, and the legal institutions which support it and/or alternate systems for protecting inventions
  • LO3. Understand the nature of the international trade mark and patent systems and how they impact on Australian law.
  • LO4. Understand and be able to apply the law relating to trade marks (including passing off) and patents in Australia
  • LO5. Analyse content-specific legal problems effectively and apply legal method to present appropriate legal advice clearly and succinctly both orally and in writing
  • LO6. Further develop case analysis and statutory interpretation skills as they relate to the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth), Patents Act 1990 (Cth), and the Australian Consumer Law and attendant cases

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Minor changes to the essay submission process (eg requiring an outline and first draft) has been included in response to student feedback

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.